FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in North Aurora

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you reside in North Aurora and are searching for the leading attorneys specializing in dog bite injuries, look no further than Carlson Bier. Our team of illustrious personal injury lawyers is well-versed in the complex Illinois state laws concerning injuries due to animal attacks. We understand that when you or a loved one becomes a victim of such incidents, it leads to more than just physical pain; it also leaves psychological wounds and mounting medical bills. Here at Carlson Bier, we handle each case with utmost professionalism and empathy because your recovery – both emotional and financial – matters deeply to us. With meticulous attention to detail coupled with an aggressive approach, our experts work relentlessly towards getting victims their rightful compensation while holding negligence accountable. Putting trust in our proven track record means securing unwavering dedication from skilled practitioners who are determined not only about winning your case but also about facilitating justice for all affected by similar distressing events within the community—thus making Carlson Bier synonymous with triumph over adversity when dealing with dog bite injury litigations.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in North Aurora Illinois

The devastating impact of dog bite injuries often transcends the physical pain and scars. Psychological trauma, medical bills, and lost wages contribute to a comprehensive cycle of distress that victims must deal with. At Carlson Bier, our emphasis is on ensuring your burdens are eased as we efficiently aid you in understanding your rights under Illinois law and help secure the compensation you deserve.

Dog bites pose statutory liability under Illinois law where the owner becomes liable for damages whenever his or her dog attacks another person without provocation. This extends even if the dog had never been aggressive prior to this incident or if the victim was not legally on the owner’s premises at the time. We at Carlson Bier strive to appropriately translate these statutes into a language you understand, simplifying legal complexities so they’re not overwhelming.

• Dog owners bear responsibility: Under Illinois law, dog owners are held responsible when their pet causes injury.

• Unprovoked attacks: The victim doesn’t need to demonstrate that he/she did nothing to provoke the attack- this critical fact alone can strengthen your case against negligent pet owners.

• Legal permission irrelevant: Whether you were allowed onto private property does not affect your potential claim for a dog bite injury.

An essential component in tackling a personal injury claim involves comprehensively documenting each facet of your case. Our team emphasizes detailed record keeping from medical reports to witness testimonies aiding immensely during negotiations and trial proceedings, should it come down to them.

Here’s what factors into building a compelling case:

• Collecting information: Obtaining data such as pictures of injuries sustained, animal vaccination records or contact details from witnesses is vital.

• Complete Medical Examination: A thorough medical check-up will highlight any immediate or latent health problems resulting from the attack.

• Follow-ups & Treatment Records: Regular follow-up treatment post-hospitalization substantiates claims made about ongoing mental and emotional trauma faced by victims.

Identifying all possible sources of monetary recovery for victims is an integral part of our approach. Our legal team collaboratively employs its experience in dealing with homeowner’s insurance, renter’s insurance and commercial liability policies so you can receive the compensation that you deserve.

We ensure a complete overview of what comprises your rightful claim:

• Medical Expenses: Costs related to the injury, both immediate and long-term.

• Lost Wages: If an inability to work persists after the accident.

• Pain & Suffering: Compensation for physical discomfort and emotional distress.

At Carlson Bier, we recognize the paramount importance of determining potential future medical costs victims may incur due to permanent disfigurement or disability. As your attorneys, our obligation extends beyond just managing present financial burdens; we promise thoroughness when forecasting any forthcoming expenses related to dog bite injuries.

Every case is unique and requires personal attention. At Carlson Bier, you never have to worry about being lost in a sea of cases; we assure each client receives personalized care and professional assistance throughout their journey towards justice.

Dog bite injuries don’t only leave physical trauma but disrupt lives causing significant strains financially and emotionally. With so many variables involved in resolving these matters legally, it’s crucially important having expert legal teams like ours at Carlson Bier on your side as we aim to ease this burden by efficiently guiding you through all aspects from understanding laws to calculating compensation ensuring every detail is addressed meticulously.

If you or someone dear has been affected by a dog-bite injury, take action today against negligent pet owners who’ve disrupted your life unfairly. Remember, with every delay in seeking professional advice, building a strong case becomes challenging! Click on the button below now for further guidance; let us help determine how much your case might be worth –because at Carlson Bier– Your Peace Is Our Priority!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For North Aurora Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in North Aurora

Areas of Practice in North Aurora

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Specializing in legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or perilous conditions.

Flame Damages

Giving expert legal help for victims of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Medical Carelessness

Providing professional legal assistance for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Obligation

Managing cases involving unsafe products, supplying adept legal assistance to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Malpractice

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip and Fall Mishaps

Skilled in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking redress for their losses.

Neonatal Injuries

Offering legal support for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Crashes

Collisions: Committed to supporting victims of car accidents secure just compensation for wounds and harm.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Truck Crash

Providing specialist legal services for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for injuries.

Construction Crashes

Engaged in defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Head Impairments

Focused on extending specialized legal representation for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Injuries

Specialized in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Dedicated to legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Demise

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and adept legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Damage

Dedicated to assisting persons with backbone trauma, offering expert legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​