Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in North Center

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In navigating the aftermath of a slip and fall accident, it is essential to have expert legal guidance. That’s where Carlson Bier comes in—your trusted companion towards just compensation. With an impressive track record in Slip And Fall Accident cases across Illinois, our seasoned lawyers ensure that justice prevails for you. We advocate fiercely, holding negligent parties accountable, and securing maximum reimbursement for your pain or injury suffered.

Renowned throughout North Center as pivotal allies during challenging times, we bring unparalleled dedication to every case we undertake at Carlson Bier. Armed with well-honed skills from years of experience addressing nuanced laws relevant to such accidents—we save you from undue stress typically associated with intricate legal processes.

At Carlson Bier, your needs are put first; we employ a client-centered approach tailored meticulously around specific circumstances surrounding each case’s unique narrative—an endearing quality that sets us apart in the field. If you seek adept representation after experiencing a debilitating slip and fall incident—choose nothing less than expertise synonymous with excellence: Choose Larson Bier—the paragon of personal injury law practice built on relentless pursuit of your rights!

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in North Center Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are more than just an adept personal injury attorney group in Illinois. We are your tireless advocates when you suffer an unfortunate slip-and-fall accident and seek legal recourse. Slip-and-fall cases can be a complex labyrinth of laws and red tape, but with our wealth of experience and expertise, we devote ourselves to guiding you every step along the way.

The first crucial aspect to understand about slip-and-fall accidents is what they entail. Typically, these incidents occur when individuals unexpectedly fall on someone else’s property due to hazardous conditions like wet floors, unsecured rugs or carpets, icy walkways or poor lighting. The injuries sustained may range from minor inconveniences such as sprains or fractures to significant problems including traumatic brain injuries or spinal cord damage.

Proving fault in these cases can become complicated as it often requires comprehensive evidence collection coupled with detailed understanding of State law. Key factors to consider include establishing if:

• The property owner caused the slippery condition

• The property owner knew about the hazardous situation but did nothing

• The property owner should have known about the danger because a “reasonable” person would have discovered it

At Carlson Bier, we employ our profound knowledge of Illinois premises liability laws to ensure your case receives top-notch representation. Our commitment extends beyond mere paper pushing; we go out into the field for thorough investigation processes involving site inspections, witness interviews and acquiring any available surveillance footage.

Another fundamental subject related to slip-and-fall accidents deals with potential damages one could recover during such lawsuits: Medical costs incurred for treatment immediately after the incident as well as prolonged care required due to long-term effects suffered are covered under this premise. Additionally, lost wages endured during recovery time also come under consideration alongside compensation for emotional distress or decreased quality of life arising from sustained injuries.

The statute of limitations is another critical component that needs highlighting – Under Illinois law, most personal injury lawsuits must be filed within two years of the date of the incident. Swift action is urged to ensure this window doesn’t close inadvertently, possibly costing you rightful compensation.

Lastly, always understand that insurance companies might not necessarily be in your corner. Their objective could be minimizing what they pay out; therefore, it’s doubly vital having strong legal representation like Carlson Bier advocating for you – ensuring insurance companies comply with their duty and assessing any offered settlement from an experienced viewpoint.

At Carlson Bier, we fiercely adhere to the law and ethical guidelines – we want our clients to know that while we may provide our services across Illinois; contrary to what some advertisements suggest, it is against Illinois regulations for a law firm to claim that they are located within a city where they don’t have a physical office. Our dedication focuses on providing comprehensive guidance and support wherever you may be based in the State – without compromising honesty or integrity.

Navigating through the aftermath of a slip-and-fall accident can be daunting – physically, emotionally, and legally. Still, rest assured at Carlson Bier, your concerns metamorphose into ours as soon as you entrust us with representing you during such trying times. Your predicament becomes our challenge to surmount systematically and professionally – always keeping your best interests at heart.

Be prepared for whatever comes next by arming yourself with information regarding how much your case could potentially be worth financially – Click on the button below for a complete evaluation now! Because at Carlson Bier, every client matters – Your fight becomes our fight too.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For North Center Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in North Center

Areas of Practice in North Center

Bike Incidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Offering adept legal services for patients of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Medical Malpractice

Offering professional legal services for clients affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Accountability

Managing cases involving dangerous products, extending expert legal services to victims affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Tumble Occurrences

Specialist in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking restitution for their harm.

Childbirth Harms

Offering legal help for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Collisions

Accidents: Committed to supporting patients of car accidents gain just payout for hurts and harm.

Bike Crashes

Specializing in providing legal support for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

18-Wheeler Collision

Delivering professional legal services for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for losses.

Building Collisions

Concentrated on representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Cerebral Harms

Specializing in delivering specialized legal advice for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Specialized in managing cases for persons who have suffered damages from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Dedicated to legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unjust Fatality

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and experienced legal support to ensure justice.

Vertebral Harm

Dedicated to representing persons with vertebral damage, offering expert legal representation to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer