FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in North Center

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has endured the hardship of a spinal cord injury in North Center, it’s vital to consult with an experienced attorney who specializes in this complex area of law. Renowned for their unique expertise and personalized approach is Carlson Bier. With proven proficiency handling intricate spinal cord injury cases, they are well-versed in the various facets of Illinois’ personal injury laws. Understanding that each case carries its own complications and challenges, the team at Carlson Bier never employs a ‘one size fits all’ strategy but tailors advocacy passionately to every individual client need. What sets them apart? It’s not just about representing clients; it’s about guiding victims through legal intricacies towards beneficial resolutions while combating for rightful compensation efficiently and effectively. The unwavering commitment to integrity makes Carlson Bier an optimal consideration when seeking premium representation for spinal cord injuries matters within North Center surroundings — Advocacy tailored exclusively to meet your needs vigilantly!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in North Center Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to serving those who have suffered personal injuries due to the negligence of others. As an Illinois-based law firm, we specialize in several areas including Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI), one of the most debilitating and life-changing conditions a person could experience.

Spinal cord injuries arise from damage to the spinal cord that results in a loss of function or movement. These can be categorized into two main types: complete and incomplete. A complete SCI is characterized by the total lack of sensory and motor functions below the site of injury while an incomplete SCI involves some degree of functioning remaining.

Key factors influencing a successful outcome for our clients include early detection, immediate comprehensive medical treatment, rehabilitation programs, as well as social support structures. Appreciating these elements enables us determine the best approach toward resolving your case successfully:

• Early detection: Immediate diagnosis can prevent further harm.

• Comprehensive treatment: This involves not just managing physical aspects but also psychological ones.

• Rehabilitation program: Customized exercises help regain lost mobility while interventions aid psychosocial adjustment.

• Support structure: Counseling plays critical roles towards coping with life after spinal cord injury.

Moving forward post-SCI can indeed be daunting, but you don’t have to navigate it alone. We at Carlson Bier leverage our deep knowledge on this type of cases enabling top quality legal representation aimed at securing maximum compensation for our clients’ pain and suffering.

Several important factors come into play when calculating how much a SCI settlement might be worth involving considerations on

medical costs (emergency transport services cost, surgeries, medications amongst others.), future care costs typically arising from adjustments to living environment and long-term rehabilitative needs such as physiotherapy or psychotherapy sessions; loss of income resulting from inability work current job or lower-paying reemployment opportunities; non-economic expenses associated with pain suffering along financial hardships caused by having pay out-of-pocket particular items like wheelchairs other mobility tools.

Accidents resulting in spinal cord injuries can take away so much – your mobility, possibly your employment, and a level of independence. However, they should not rob you of justice and the financial recompense necessary for your care and future. So if you or a loved one has experienced a spinal cord injury due to another person’s negligence, we encourage you not to suffer in silence.

Our law firm is committed to fighting tirelessly on behalf of our clients with expert legal guidance throughout the often-complex process of filing and securing personal injury claims compensation through settlement negotiations or trial litigation as necessary. And while no amount of money can undo the harm inflicted, it can significantly mitigate its impact by facilitating access to requisite medical care, therapies as well as supporting domiciliary needs thereby enhancing quality life post this traumatizing event.

While looking online for answers may be convenient, speaking directly with an attorney at Carlson Bier will provide useful information specific to your case. If any part of what you just read applies to you; if you are grappling with problems associated with Spinal Cord Injuries brought about due to another individual’s negligence or recklessness – click on the button below right now!

No matter the complexity of your case or how overwhelming things might seem at present; when it comes down ensuring that those who wronged you pay dearly their actions while aptly compensating appropriately deserved rightful damages – trust us raise bar just like we’ve been doing across Illinois quite some time now.

Remember: Every second counts particularly regards statute limitations thus need urgent response following an accident. Discover potential worth legal claim today by clicking button below!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For North Center Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in North Center

Areas of Practice in North Center

Bicycle Incidents

Specializing in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Scald Injuries

Offering professional legal support for patients of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Healthcare Incompetence

Extending experienced legal advice for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Accountability

Addressing cases involving defective products, offering skilled legal guidance to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Abuse

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble and Stumble Injuries

Professional in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking recovery for their injuries.

Neonatal Wounds

Supplying legal support for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Incidents: Concentrated on supporting individuals of car accidents get equitable recompense for wounds and damages.

Motorbike Incidents

Focused on providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

18-Wheeler Collision

Delivering adept legal advice for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for hurts.

Building Accidents

Concentrated on defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Brain Harms

Dedicated to ensuring expert legal services for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Traumas

Specialized in addressing cases for persons who have suffered harms from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Committed to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Death

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and expert legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Neural Trauma

Focused on supporting persons with paralysis, offering expert legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440