...

Bicycle Accidents in North Lawndale

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the fast-paced environment of North Lawndale, bicycle accidents can be all too common causing personal injuries requiring legal counsel. If you find yourself in such a situation, Carlson Bier is an exceptional choice of representation competent in handling bicycle accident cases to aid the recovery process. Our expert attorneys with years of diverse experience are equipped to handle even complex cases and claim scenarios that arise from bike accidents; they work tirelessly to ensure fair compensation for your losses. At Carlton Bier, our commitment transcends toward achieving justice while upholding absolute honesty and professional responsibility. We possess intricate understanding about laws regarding bicycling in Illinois ensuring optimal guidance in navigating through various legal formalities involved when an unfortunate event occurs. With uncompromised dedication towards safeguarding client interests against manipulative insurance adjusters or opposing counsel, we stand by you every step of the way facilitating faster resolution and maximum recompense under Illinois law’s permissible limits—making us a reliable advocate for any victim afflicted due to someone else’s negligence on North Lawndale’s roads.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in North Lawndale Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that bicycle accidents can result in severe physical injuries, emotional distress and significant financial burdens. As highly experienced personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our commitment is to provide you with comprehensive assistance based on the specific details of your experience. Our goal is not only to fight for your rights but also to facilitate your understanding of essential legal processes involved in a situation like this.

Bicycle accidents often involve unique circumstances that require specialist knowledge and expertise – all aspects that our personal injury law group excels in. It’s crucial to be aware that, unlike car drivers, cyclists lack protective structures when out on the road. This vulnerability exposes them to much higher risks should an unfortunate accident occur.

Several factors contribute significantly to these types of incidents:

– Negligent motorists who fail to observe traffic rules.

– Poorly maintained cycling routes or roads posing potential hazards.

– Defectively manufactured bicycles leading to mechanical failure.

Understanding these elements provides insight into how arguments can be structured effectively while fighting for compensations or claims due from such adversities.

Consequences experienced by victims of bicycle accidents are far-ranging from physical trauma – catastrophic injuries impacting the brain or spine, bone fractures, severe skin abrasions – through psychological effects – post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety disorders, etc., not forgetting astronomical medical expenses burying most families into financial instability if not outright ruin.

Our role at Carlson Bier involves championing for your fundamental rights as stipulated under Illinois state laws while equipping you with comprehensive legal education about Bicycle Accidents. We believe that every individual reserves the right to justice regardless of their awareness level regarding compensation-related matters post such incidents.

The Illinois Vehicle Code expressly protects cyclists’ liberties ensuring they enjoy equal space and freedom alongside motor vehicles on roads statewide. However, it must be acknowledged that multiple Have-Nots still suffer without adequate representation across legal systems throughout the country ensuing which reliable education dissemination on this topic becomes mandatory.

For interested readers, the Illinois Vehicle Code provides an exhaustive list of bicyclist rights and responsibilities. Being aware of these rules not only helps cyclists protect themselves but also lets them understand their rightful place within road traffic. Ranging from cycling path etiquette to equipment standards, navigating cyclist-motorist interactions, understanding relevant ordinances offers a sense of empowerment in the face of traumatising experiences such as bicycle accidents.

At Carlson Bier, we firmly believe in tirelessly advocating for our clients’ best interests. Collating minutiae surrounding each incident allows us to create compelling narratives that account for their pain and suffering while optimally assisting them throughout prolific recovery periods.

We encourage every client and reader out there today reeling under the aftermaths of calamitous bike accidents; click immediately on the button displayed conveniently below your screen right away. Uncover how much your case might be worth in terms of legal compensation with assistance from leading personal injury attorneys who prioritise nurturing trust-based relationships rather than exploiting unfortunate circumstances purely from transactional perspectives!

Let Carlson Bier be your dependable partner supporting you ardently along every step within this stressful journey manoeuvring through convoluted legal processes post life-altering bike accidents. Please know that we are here for YOU!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed. Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that: 1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages; 2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and 3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed. The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed. Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that: 1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and 2 setoff clauses were enforceable. Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted. Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that: 1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and 2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits. Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For North Lawndale Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in North Lawndale

Areas of Practice in North Lawndale

Bicycle Accidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Burn Traumas

Extending specialist legal assistance for victims of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Clinical Carelessness

Providing dedicated legal assistance for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Accountability

Managing cases involving defective products, supplying adept legal services to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Misconduct

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Slip and Trip Mishaps

Professional in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking recovery for their losses.

Childbirth Wounds

Offering legal assistance for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Mishaps: Focused on aiding sufferers of car accidents gain fair settlement for injuries and impairment.

Motorbike Collisions

Focused on providing representation for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Semi Mishap

Delivering specialist legal representation for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for hurts.

Worksite Accidents

Dedicated to defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Head Injuries

Focused on offering professional legal support for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Harms

Expertise in addressing cases for victims who have suffered damages from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Specializing in legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unjust Demise

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and expert legal support to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Harm

Dedicated to defending patients with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal representation to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer