FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in North Pekin

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to spinal cord injuries, securing the assistance of a knowledgeable and committed law firm is crucial —your choice could significantly impact your case’s outcome. Carlson Bier is an Illinois-based personal injury attorney group that excels in these complex cases. With deep expertise in handling Spinal Cord Injuries claims, our experienced lawyers understand the intricacies associated with this severe trauma. As we fight for victims’ rights across various cities including North Pekin, our main objective revolves around championing their cause and ensuring they receive fair compensation. Our reputation is grounded on integrity, professionalism and commitment to each client; factors that make Carlson Bier stand out as a trusted ally in legal battles concerning spinal cord injuries. Turning obstacles into opportunities for justice has always been at the heart of what we do at Carlson Bier – Your satisfaction remains integral to us. Remember—when dealing with such life-altering conditions— having reliable counsel can make all the difference.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in North Pekin Illinois

As a recognized leader in personal injury law, Carlson Bier is committed to delivering legal counsel for victims who have suffered spinal cord injuries in Illinois. Such types of injuries, often incurred due to motor vehicle accidents, falls, acts of violence or sports incidents, can lead to significant physical trauma and emotional distress. Our focus at Carlson Bier is on helping our clients understand the intricacies associated with these kinds of claims.

Spinal Cord Injuries encompass both complete and incomplete injuries. Complete spinal cord injuries involve total loss of function below the level of the injury while incomplete ones allow some ability or movement beneath the damage site. Symptoms may vary from slight numbness to various degrees of paralysis.

In terms of medical prognosis for such cases, it can be difficult to predict. Each injury has uniqueness depending on factors such as the severity and location of the damage within the spinal cord. After initial treatment that typically focuses on preventing further injury and restoring bodily functions, long-term care needs are assessed including rehabilitation therapy objectives.

The financial impact is another aspect that warrants discussion– medical bills combined with lost wages due to inability to work can quickly pile up leaving victims in crippling debt even as they grapple with physical challenges. Rehabilitation cost isn’t just confined monetary losses but includes other aspects like pain/suffering caused by incident-related problems including depression or anxiety disorders which neccessiate psychological counseling.

Here’s what you should know:

• Each case is unique and requires careful investigation.

• Professionals are needed not just for proving liability but also for determining correct compensation value.

• The importance of expedient action cannot be overstressed; statutes relating to limitation periods dictate maximum time frames within which legal proceedings must staticize.

When navigating through complex laws surrounding personal injury litigation revolving around Spinal Cord Injuries there’s need specialized skills/knowledge– That’s where we come into play! Having been serving injured parties for a substantial duration, Carlson Bier possesses expertise representing clients, pursuing fair compensation in these challenging circumstances.

Our commitment to you is that we’ll be supportive during every stage of the journey – starting with exploring legal options, building a compelling case for securing rightful damages, and negotiating settlements. If needed, our experienced litigators aren’t hesitant about taking matters to court- all towards one goal: helping clients get justice they deserve.

Every case undertaken by our firm starts with thorough needs assessment review followed by systematic planning guide based on individual requirements; subject matter competency allows us to delineate most effective strategies provide extraordinary customer experiences at every personal interaction point.

Understanding your rights can often be complex but Carlson Bier aims at simplifying this process on your behalf so you can focus on recovery while we work on achieving best possible legal outcome from an unfortunate situation. The emotional experience associated with spinal injuries can be overwhelming especially when it changes lifestyle drastically but working together we seek not just monetary damages but also restore dignity stripped off due act negligence or intentional harm caused someone else.

To see how much value your Spinal Cord Injury claim might have click the button below– We are ready to carry out thorough assessment provide clear picture regarding potential settlement amounts/timelines make informed decisions moving forward. Your search for a reliable Personal Injury Attorney ends here– Partner Carlson Bier expert guidance courtroom representation worth trusting! As legally responsible for any misleading information given please note that contrary what may find online elsewhere, don’t own physical office North Pekin therefore refrain such claims misrepresentation.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For North Pekin Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in North Pekin

Areas of Practice in North Pekin

Bicycle Crashes

Proficient in legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Burn Wounds

Providing specialist legal help for victims of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Healthcare Negligence

Extending experienced legal assistance for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Fault

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, supplying skilled legal guidance to victims affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Abuse

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Stumble Mishaps

Specialist in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking justice for their harm.

Childbirth Injuries

Offering legal assistance for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Collisions: Dedicated to aiding individuals of car accidents obtain fair compensation for damages and destruction.

Bike Incidents

Dedicated to providing representation for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Semi Collision

Ensuring adept legal advice for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for hurts.

Building Site Incidents

Committed to defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Brain Injuries

Focused on providing compassionate legal services for patients suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Injuries

Skilled in managing cases for persons who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Focused on legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Wrongful Demise

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and experienced legal support to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Injury

Expert in advocating for victims with backbone trauma, offering professional legal representation to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440