Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in North Peoria

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re seeking an outstanding attorney to represent your interests following dog bite injuries, our team at Carlson Bier is prepared to provide exceptional legal support. Fully focused on personal injury cases in Illinois, we bring a breadth of knowledge and experience that allows us to successfully navigate the intricate hurdles associated with dog bite case procedures. You deserve full reparation for your pain and damages, and our firm’s high success rate attests to our ability in securing favorable outcomes for clients like you. Despite the complex nature of these cases across various jurisdictions – including North Peoria – we relentlessly pursue justice. Our adeptness in understanding unique city-specific regulations ensures no stone goes unturned as we tirelessly build your case strategy. Partnering with Carlson Bier means receiving depth-oriented representation from attorneys whose priority is not just winning but deeply understanding each client’s particular situation before tailoring a comprehensive plan to suit their specific requirements optimally when faced with dog bite injuries.We look forward dtanding up for you!

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in North Peoria Illinois

At Carlson Bier, your safety and your rights are our top priority. Our skilled team of personal injury attorneys is prepared to protect those rights, particularly in cases of dog bite injuries, a unique but prevalent area of law that often goes unnoticed. Dog bites can be both physically damaging and emotionally traumatizing — causing pain that persists for years after the incident occurs.

Understanding Illinois state laws on dog bite injuries is absolutely essential when pursuing legal recourse. With strict liability laws in place, a victim bitten by an owner’s dog may recover damages even with no fault explicitly assigned to the owner. Owners are held responsible if their pet injures another person, regardless of whether or not the dog has a history of aggressive behaviour.

• Victim Safety: In these cases, the primary focus is first and foremost on ensuring the safety and well-being of victims.

• Dog Owner Responsibility: The onus falls upon owners to maintain control over their pets at all times.

• Legal Recourse: Any victim has a right to pursue justice through direct compensation or court-adjudicated restitution.

Furthermore, it is crucial to seek immediate medical attention following any dog-related injury as timely care can decrease risks significantly. This treatment also provides important documentation which could prove vital during any subsequent legal proceedings.

Know that with Carlson Bier beside you every step of the way; we stand ready with knowledge and experience in fighting for your interests until justice prevails. You’re never alone when dealing with complex situations such as this; we pride ourselves on our provisional support, available 24/7 for client concerns regarding their case progression or rights under Illinois law.

Despite popular belief, any breed can cause harm – from small Chihuahuas all the way up to heavier breeds like Mastiffs or Rottweilers. Variety isn’t just limited solely towards species type either since aggression generally doesn’t stem predominantly due purely genetic factors alone but could be influenced by environmental triggers too making each individual case unique in terms of cause and effect.

• Breed Unbiased: A common misconception is that heavier breeds tend to be more aggressive, but statistics show this is not the case.

• Psychology: Elements such as upbringing, environment and triggers often contribute to a dog’s propensity for aggression.

• Individual Circumstances: Each case must be assessed on its own merits due to these varying factors.

The Carlson Bier group understands the deep emotional turmoil accompanying such an instance. We empathize with our clients’ physical pain, psychological distress, lost wages due to time off from work, and medical expenses incurred. Our aim is simple – restore your peace of mind by delivering comprehensive legal support designed to maximize compensation so you can focus on recovering fully without added stress or financial burden.

Should you find yourself pondering the extent of what could damage cover under Illinois law; we encourage you to reach out today. The challenges faced post-dog bite can seem daunting but rest assured at Carlson Bier we navigate through intricacies of legal proceedings tirelessly ensuring justice wellserved benefit our client’s well-being & long-term recovery efforts effectively leaving no stone unturned need arises.

The unfortunate truth about dog bite injuries is, they’re frequently much more severe than people realise — both physically and emotionally. You shouldn’t have to bear those burdens alone — that’s where we come in dedicatedly guiding you seamlessly through possible court appearances whilst simultaneously advocating relentlessly in favour ensuring utmost regard empathy throughout process firmly.

Feel free clicking the button below right now if want better understanding just exactly how much worth each specific situation varies depending upon numerous variables including severity animal attack along any subsequent health concerns perpetuated thereof remember every single victim’s circumstance treated equally respect dignity deserved regardless who they are where from henceforth determination value left entirely up judge/jury carefully reviewed presented evidence displayed proficiently legal team accordingly . Remember ‘REQUEST MY CASE VALUE NOW’.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For North Peoria Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in North Peoria

Areas of Practice in North Peoria

Cycling Collisions

Specializing in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Scald Traumas

Offering adept legal assistance for patients of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Physician Incompetence

Providing expert legal advice for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Responsibility

Managing cases involving faulty products, supplying adept legal guidance to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Misconduct

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip and Trip Mishaps

Skilled in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking compensation for their injuries.

Infant Traumas

Supplying legal aid for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Accidents

Mishaps: Concentrated on aiding clients of car accidents obtain just compensation for damages and losses.

Motorcycle Crashes

Specializing in providing legal support for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Trucking Crash

Extending adept legal support for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for harms.

Construction Site Crashes

Engaged in advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Neurological Harms

Expert in offering specialized legal services for clients suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Wounds

Expertise in addressing cases for clients who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Committed to legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Undeserved Demise

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and skilled legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Injury

Committed to defending victims with paralysis, offering specialized legal guidance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer