FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in North Peoria

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to seeking justice for spinal cord injuries, the impeccable service and formidable expertise that Carlson Bier brings to the table are paramount. As an esteemed law firm serving clients in North Peoria and beyond, we emphasize helping those who have personally endured or witnessed a loved one suffer from traumatic spinal injuries navigate through this trying time. Over years of practicing personal injury law, our dedicated attorneys have accrued extensive experience dealing with complex cases involving such serious medical conditions and induced acute distress. We stand as passionate advocates while maximising your entitled compensation rights under Illinois’s legal framework. Stressing innovative strategies alongside immense sensitivity concerning our client’s circumstances sets us apart; because at Carlson Bier, every case is treated with absolute professionalism and relentless dedication to securing rightful justice for you. Our reputation has been crafted on hard-won victories in challenging spinal injury lawsuits that reinforce why partnering with Carlson Bier ensures you’re versed with adept legal counsel in your fight towards recovery and peace of mind.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in North Peoria Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on understanding and effectively addressing the myriad of complex legal issues that arise when dealing with Spinal Cord Injuries. As a top-tier personal injury law firm based in Illinois, our team of skilled attorneys is deeply committed to providing you with the highest quality representation possible. Your wellbeing matters to us- especially when such grave injuries like those of the spinal cord are involved.

Spinal Cord Injuries can result from diverse factors including but not limited to auto accidents, workplace mishaps, fallacies due to negligence or malpractice during medical procedures among others. These injuries often have extensive impacts such as disability, chronic pain, loss of motor function and hence an ultimate alteration in one’s living standards. Our personal injury law practitioners stand ready to guide you through this difficult time by offering expert counsel that rights these tragic wrongs.

When determining if you have a valid claim for your Spiconal rd Injury issue(s), there are several key things to observe:

· Was an act of carelessness or negligence directly responsible for your injury?

· Have you experienced significant life changes due to your injury?

· Has your ability to earn income been affected?

· Are there ongoing costs related to medical bills or rehabilitation?

After an accident resulting in a Spinal Cord Injury, immediate action should be taken as statutes of limitations may apply in filing legal claims. To maximize potential compensation, Carlson Bier strives towards handling every detail for each client’s case wholeheartedly because we believe strongly in justice – holding culpable parties accountable while creating avenues for pathways of relief.

Understanding how important clear communication is in legally dense situations such as these involving Spinal Cord Injuries; we aim at simplifying even the most intricate facets into easy-to-digest documents and discussions.. The wealth of knowledge amassed over years coupled up with dedication ensures our clients get nothing but an impressive case outcome – Look no further than our track record results which we’ve been able to accomplish because of just these principles.

At Carlson Bier, your fight becomes ours. As your representatives, we are committed to conducting thorough investigations into the circumstances surrounding your injury acquiring crucial evidence that builds an ironclad case on your behalf. We craft compelling arguments tailored for best results in negotiations and court proceedings always seeking maximum compensation for clients’ losses and suffering.

To our potential clientele based in Illinois: Don’t endure this burden alone and don’t shy away from pursuing what is rightfully owed to you even when it initially seems like a taxing journey due to complex legal procedures; remember there’s a personal injury law firm sincerely invested in making things right for you – That’s us at Carlson Bier Associates LLC.

Accidents resulting in Spinal Cord Injuries present challenges unlike any other but having competent legal representation offers hope amid the adversity. Discover the peace of mind that comes with knowing seasoned experts are working tirelessly on your behalf towards gaining justice ad compensation you deserve.

Feeling a bit curious about what value lies ahead? You can easily determine this by simply clicking the button below where we provide an estimate scope of how much your case could possibly be worth. Let us help ease this hard tolling phase with professional support; hand-in-hand throughout every step until you attain successful closure or judgement within this unpleasant ordeal caused by your Spinal Cord Injury.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For North Peoria Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in North Peoria

Areas of Practice in North Peoria

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Expert in legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Burn Wounds

Giving adept legal help for patients of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Healthcare Carelessness

Delivering dedicated legal assistance for patients affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Fault

Managing cases involving faulty products, offering professional legal support to clients affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Neglect

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble & Fall Accidents

Expert in managing trip accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking compensation for their suffering.

Infant Injuries

Delivering legal assistance for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Collisions: Focused on supporting sufferers of car accidents secure reasonable remuneration for hurts and damages.

Scooter Crashes

Focused on providing representation for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

18-Wheeler Incident

Providing experienced legal support for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for injuries.

Construction Accidents

Concentrated on representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Traumas

Focused on offering dedicated legal assistance for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Wounds

Expertise in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered harms from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Expert in legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Unfair Loss

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and professional legal assistance to ensure justice.

Spine Impairment

Focused on advocating for victims with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal support to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​