Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Northlake

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you find yourself a victim of a slip and fall accident in Northlake, the need for competent legal representation becomes imperative. Carlson Bier, esteemed personal injury attorneys adept at navigating Illinois law concerning such incidents, can be your guiding force. With a keen understanding of the complexities involved with slip and fall accidents – from identifying liability to fighting for just compensation – Carlson Bier remains unmatched in expertise and dedication. Our skilled team is renowned for their research caliber, treating every case individually to ensure no matter how unique your circumstances are; you get justice served accurately. By choosing us as your advocates during this trying period, rest assured that we relentlessly strive for achieving maximum possible recovery on your behalf while ensuring all legal intricacies are handled flawlessly under rigorous adherence to Illinois law norms. Trust Carlson Bier’s decades-long legacy in managing personal injury cases proficiently when it comes to securing rightful reparations post-slip and fall mishaps.

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Northlake Illinois

As a premier Illinois law firm, Carlson Bier provides comprehensive expertise and able advocacy for victims of personal injury cases. Specifically, our firm presents an advanced proficiency in handling Slip and Fall Accident cases. It is not uncommon to perceive these incidences as trivial mishaps; however, the aftermath can lead to serious injuries such as fractures, concussions, and sometimes enduring physical damage that demands lengthy recovery periods or lifelong medical treatments. This serves to underscore the importance of entailing professional legal guidance when dealing with Slip and Fall Accidents.

While laws concerning slip and fall accidents may differ across jurisdictions, there are key general principles applicable that you should be aware of:

– If your accident occurred due to unsafe or defective conditions on someone else’s property

– If the property owner knew about the dangerous condition but didn’t take immediate corrective measures

– If your action wasn’t contributory negligence i.e., it cannot be reasonably assumed that an aware person would anticipate danger under similar circumstances

Navigating through these complexities requires profound grasp of local statutes, bolstered by deft execution – hallmarks synonymous with Carlson Bier. Our proficient attorneys diligently evaluate every facet of your situation leveraging their vast experience in accurately determining fault thereby maximizing potential compensation. Your welfare deserves more than makeshift arrangements –you need unwavering advocates zealously fighting on your behalf ensuring complete accountability from negligent parties.

A clear distinction exists between minor falls resulting in no significant harm compared to those leading to severe injuries or disabilities. Hence it’s essential not only from a medical perspective but also important legally to seek timely diagnosis since symptoms might not immediately manifest post incidents but could develop over time into life-altering predicaments.

Did you encounter a slip and fall accident while at work? As part of Worker’s Compensation insurance carried by Illinois employers, you stand entitled to certain benefits irrespective of fault determination provided the incident happened within designated workplace during official hours. This spans coverage for medical expenses as well as compensation for temporary or permanent disabilities sustained.

Understanding these differing principles associated with slip and fall at public establishments versus workplace accidents are imperative when presenting your case. Notwithstanding these broad guidelines, each incident is unique – a fundamental reason why the Carlson Bier team adopts meticulously personalized approaches crafting adept representation strategies to suit specific client requirements.

Overwhelmed by mounds of paperwork entailing medical bills or intimidated by coercive insurance tactics diluting your rightful claims? With Carlson Bier, fret not about being ushered from one unresponsive department to another – we believe in direct communication providing clear legal course of action underpinned by empathetic consultation aiding you through these challenging times.

As part of our commitment toward driving informed decision-making supported by authentic, quality information; we ensure effortless comprehension of legal jargon breaking it down into layman terms. The journey towards remunerative justice shouldn’t be hindered due to complex technicalities – emphasis integral to our belief system mirrored in our comprehensive handling of cases right from initiation till successful closure securing prompt and maximum payouts empowering clients reclaim control over their disrupted lives.

All this said, there’s simply no substitute for personalized counsel that takes into account all facets of your unique situation. Curious how much your case might be worth? We invite you to click on the button below which will guide you further on understanding potential pecuniary benefits associated with your claim while affording valuable insights into how partnering with seasoned professionals like us can make a pivotal difference- paving way towards swift restitution restoring normalcy and peace back in life.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Northlake Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Northlake

Areas of Practice in Northlake

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Expert in legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Supplying adept legal help for people of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Physician Negligence

Offering dedicated legal advice for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Fault

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, extending specialist legal services to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble and Slip Accidents

Expert in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking recovery for their harm.

Birth Harms

Offering legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Collisions

Collisions: Committed to helping individuals of car accidents get just payout for injuries and destruction.

Motorcycle Crashes

Specializing in providing legal services for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Semi Incident

Offering experienced legal support for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for injuries.

Building Crashes

Dedicated to supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Neurological Damages

Committed to providing expert legal support for individuals suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Injuries

Expertise in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Accidents

Committed to legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Wrongful Death

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and expert legal support to ensure justice.

Spine Trauma

Dedicated to supporting patients with backbone trauma, offering expert legal services to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer