...

Car Accidents in Oak Brook

Car Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to handling car accident cases effectively, Carlson Bier stands unchallenged. As a leading law firm in Illinois, we have dedicated ourselves to providing our clients with reliable legal services and advice that can stand the test of time. Our top-notch team specializes in dealing diligently with car accidents related claims and issues. While navigating such incidents could be daunting due to intricate laws surrounding auto accidents, having an experienced ally like Carlson Bier makes all the difference. Though not based in Oak Brook specifically , this doesn’t halt our unparalleled commitment towards providing expert representation for victims who reside or work there . We are renowned for reputation of honesty , dedication and success rate that extends far beyond city limits . With every key decision dictated by best interests of victim , we always strive hard ensuring full compensation is received by client . Here at Carlson Bier, your fight becomes ours too; count on us during difficult times as your go-to Car Accidents attorney group!

About Carlson Bier

Car Accidents Lawyers in Oak Brook Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a committed team of Personal Injury Attorneys passionately pursing justice for victims of road accidents across Illinois. We make it our focus to understand the intricacies of personal injury law and vehicular accidents, so you don’t have to. Armed with extensive experience and effective strategies under our belt, we aim to safeguard your rights and ensure the compensation you deserve.

Understanding the gravity of car accidents is crucial. Everyday, countless individuals fall victim to devastating road mishaps; oftentimes these incidents may lead to serious injuries or even fatalities. If you or a loved one has found themselves in any such situation, knowing your rights and legal avenues can significantly influence the outcome of your case.

• Statute of Limitations: In Illinois, there is a two-year window from the date of the accident within which you can file a lawsuit for personal injury.

• Comparative Negligence Rule: This rule will take into account if you were partially responsible for the accident. Your eligible compensation amount might be lessened by the percentage for which you were at fault.

• Damages Cap: There isn’t any cap on most damages that could be awarded in an auto-accident related personal-injury lawsuit in our state.

Here at Carlson Bier, we do more than just filing lawsuits; we conduct thorough investigations, negotiate settlements outside court when feasible and manage trial cases while considering all potential options tailored specifically to your circumstances. Our attorneys rely upon years-long hands-on experience along with astute legal knowledge to navigate through complicated judicial procedures seamlessly.

The aftermath of an accident can seem daunting; medical expenses can pile up quickly leaving those affected overwhelmed both physically and financially. That’s why pursuing compensation becomes vital – it helps regain control over matters disrupted by unforeseeable events.

• Economic Damages typically include reimbursement or payment for out-of-pocket costs incurred after sustaining physical harm (e.g., medical bills).

• Non-Economic Damages help alleviate the subjective, non-monetary losses related to pain and suffering or mental anguish.

• Punitive Damages are levied by courts with an intent to punish defendants for their gross negligence or intentional misconduct in exceptional cases.

With our team at Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to seek justice for individuals who have been hurt in road accidents. We have a proven track record of winning maximum settlements and trial verdicts on behalf of our clients. Our firm’s goal is to strive relentlessly in application of rigorous scrutiny coupled with strategic planning necessary for the best outcome possible.

Road mishaps can be catastrophic but you need not face these challenges alone. In striving day-in and day-out fighting diligently by your side, we at Carlson Bier pride ourselves in maintaining a client-focused approach; one that ensures fair representation addressing every victim’s unique case from a compassionate perspective as well as legally intelligent standpoint.

Taking on insurance companies might seem daunting; allow us to ease your pursuit of rightful compensation. Careful consideration must be taken into vetting representatives who genuinely care about yours rights and wellbeing after traumatic experiences born out of road mishaps which turn everyday lives upside down. Your quest ends here – count on us to champion your cause tirelessly until due compensation is realized.

Should you find yourself navigating through legal complexities surrounding personal injuries resulting from car accidents? Worry no more – click the button below right away. Avail yourself free consultation outlining potential value regarding your specific claim against negligent parties contributing towards road incident causing personal injury endured by you or kin alike across Illinois boundaries – because victims’ rights matter! Don’t wait another moment! You deserve justice. Click below now and find out what your case could be worth with Carlson Bier’s top-notch legal counsel as steadfast support emanating from professional expertise.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Oak Brook Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Car Accident FAQ​

The most common causes of car accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause drivers to lose control of their vehicles.
  • Vehicle defects: Defective vehicles can cause accidents in a variety of ways.
  • Weather conditions: Rain, snow, and ice can make roads slick and dangerous.

If you are involved in a car accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a car accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a car accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

    Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your vehicle.

    Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for car accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Oak Brook

Areas of Practice in Oak Brook

Cycling Incidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or hazardous conditions.

Burn Damages

Offering expert legal advice for patients of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Healthcare Malpractice

Ensuring specialist legal representation for patients affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Responsibility

Handling cases involving problematic products, providing professional legal services to individuals affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Neglect

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall and Tumble Mishaps

Expert in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking redress for their injuries.

Infant Harms

Extending legal aid for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Accidents: Devoted to guiding individuals of car accidents gain reasonable remuneration for hurts and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Focused on providing legal services for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Big Rig Crash

Ensuring adept legal representation for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for harms.

Building Crashes

Dedicated to advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Neurological Impairments

Committed to offering compassionate legal services for individuals suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Wounds

Specialized in handling cases for victims who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Committed to legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unjust Fatality

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and professional legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Backbone Damage

Expert in supporting victims with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal assistance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer