Medical Malpractice Attorney in Oak Grove

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When tackling complex medical malpractice cases within Oak Grove, engaging a seasoned lawyer is essential. Carlson Bier, an eminent law firm in this field, is the ideal choice to represent your interests. With vast experience navigating Illinois’ intricate legal pathways related to Medical Malpractice, they are adept at delivering optimal outcomes for clients. Their lawyers possess a deep understanding of how crucial providing top-notch representation can be during these trying times. Each case presents its unique challenges; therefore their team diligently preempts potential issues with expert litigation strategies tailored to meet individual client needs and circumstances. Guided by professionalism and empathy, they strive tirelessly to secure justice for those wrongfully harmed while upholding patient rights under Illinois state laws governing healthcare practices. Carlson Bier’s demonstrated success in handling critical medical malpractice suits has cemented their reputation as committed advocates for health safety and justice promotion within the greater Oak Grove community.

About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Oak Grove Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your trusted companion in seeking justice for personal injury cases. As experienced and dedicated personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, we specialize in representing individuals who are victims of medical malpractice. Our mission is not just about securing the best possible outcome for you but providing comprehensive educational resources that help shed light on intricate legal aspects related to this complex field of law.

Medical malpractice refers to a situation where a patient suffers any form of harm because of negligence or deviation from approved standards by healthcare personnel delivering medical or health-related services. The implications can be gravely detrimental; hence understanding its nuances becomes essential so guidance can be sought timely and effectively.

The fundamental components that ground a Medical Malpractice suit involve:

• Presence of Duty: It simply implies that there existed a professional relationship between you (the patient) and your doctor.

• Breach of Duty: This signifies failure on part of your healthcare provider in offering appropriate standard care, as would be expected under similar circumstances.

• Injury Caused: It’s crucial to demonstrate that the breach of duty was directly responsible for your injuries or worsening condition.

The practiced attorneys at Carlson Bier combine their years-long expertise with meticulous investigation protocols. We diligently work towards identifying these elements necessary to substantiate your claim while articulating potential damages, losses, distress, and future medical expenses resulting from the negligent act.

While our primary commitment remains ensuring effective representation, we believe it imperative to foster adept cognizance about often overlooked factors regarded as indispensable when embarking upon the pursuit of justice in medical malpractice claims.

It involves points like:

• Statute Of Limitations: In Illinois, typically there’s a two-year timeframe (starting either from when the misconduct occurred or was discovered), within which legal action must commence.

• Expert Testimony: A vital aspect requiring third-party healthcare professionals matching practitioner’s specialty under scrutiny for objective evaluation.

Remember, each case possesses its unique characteristics and therefore complexity. You are not alone, Carlson Bier is committed to guiding you through the labyrinth of legal processes, providing expert advice, and fervently advocating for your cause in court.

Your trust propels us forward. We operate under a contingency fee agreement indicating no upfront charges or hidden costs. Our fees emerge from any damages recovered implying we get paid only if you do.

Our dedication extends beyond representing your case; it is about reinstating faith where despair looms, about transitioning strained circumstances into strength. By virtue of our consistent endeavor to bring a ton of value to each client relationship, at Carlson Bier we devote significant effort towards continually maintaining transparency while encouraging ongoing communication catering to queries, concerns or reservations that may surface during course of this collaborative partnership.

We believe firmly in justice served righteously and invite you not merely as our esteemed clients but valued partners united in upholding fairness above all else. In this journey together towards acquiring rightful recompensation and commensurate sanctity for sustained injuries owing medical malpractice claim, remember – your interests remain our absolute non-negotiable priority.

Navigating unfamiliar legal terrain can be challenging without proper preparedness and guidance. Let’s work collectively on embarking toward an enlightened pathway towards justice – understanding particulars around assessing probable damage magnitude given condition severity alongside potential plaintiff credibility forming considerable lawsuit worth determination factors.

Let’s extend this insightful discourse towards empowering you with clarity steeped insights concerning interactive evaluation tools purposed specifically for gauging potential lawsuit worthiness.

Understanding every detail entails comprehending multiple factors coming into play when determining the possible value of your medical malpractice case remains essential.

Take action today by clicking on the button below to find out how much your case could potentially be worth with the experienced team at Carlson Bier supporting you every step of the way. Start this crucial exploration with us because knowing what your case encompasses gives power back to you! Let us help you reclaim your rights, empower your decision-making, and pave the way to justice.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Oak Grove Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Oak Grove

Areas of Practice in Oak Grove

Cycling Crashes

Expert in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or dangerous conditions.

Burn Wounds

Extending expert legal advice for people of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Clinical Carelessness

Providing dedicated legal assistance for patients affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Liability

Handling cases involving defective products, providing skilled legal support to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Misconduct

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Slip Incidents

Adept in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking recovery for their losses.

Childbirth Damages

Extending legal guidance for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Incidents: Concentrated on supporting patients of car accidents obtain reasonable payout for wounds and impairment.

Bike Accidents

Committed to providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

18-Wheeler Incident

Delivering adept legal support for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for harms.

Building Site Incidents

Concentrated on representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Cerebral Harms

Expert in extending compassionate legal advice for victims suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Injuries

Expertise in tackling cases for people who have suffered damages from dog bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Committed to legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Passing

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and skilled legal guidance to ensure redress.

Backbone Trauma

Specializing in supporting persons with vertebral damage, offering professional legal representation to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer