FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Oak Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has been involved in a pedestrian accident in Oak Park, Illinois, choosing the right attorney to represent your interests is crucial. That’s where Carlson Bier comes into play offering exceptional legal assistance focused on pedestrian accidents. With years of experience handling such cases coupled with an impressive track record of success, our firm stands out as the best choice for those needing capable representation following a mishap. Our approach is collaborative and personalized; we work diligently alongside each client to ensure their rights are upheld and championed at every turn.

Understanding that immediate response can greatly impact case outcomes, we prioritize swift action without compromising our thoroughness in gathering evidence or analyzing facts related to your incident. Henceforth , if you’re seeking for dependable counsel geared towards pursuing maximum compensation after being injured as a pedestrian by negligent parties within Oak Park’s boundaries, look no further than Carlson Bier.We believe everyone deserves proficient legal help—contact us today for assistance tailored explicitly around your needs.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Oak Park Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, a top-notch personal injury law firm specializing in various forms of personal injuries including pedestrian accidents. Accidents involving pedestrians are unfortunately common and can result in significant hardship both physically and financially. Pedestrian accidents can be complex legal cases which is why it’s crucial to have an experienced attorney by your side.

Pedestrian accident claims cover a broad range of scenarios which can take place anywhere individuals are on foot – from busy city streets to rural roads, or even private parking lots. At Carlson Bier, our attorneys bring extensive expertise to the table about Illinois laws pertaining to pedestrian safety and rights.

• They understand that under Illinois law, drivers owe a “duty of care” to pedestrians.

• They know that every driver must exercise reasonable care under the circumstances; failure to do so can lead to them being designated as negligent.

• They have detailed knowledge about situations where drivers may notably breach their duty including speeding, distracted driving or failing to yield at crosswalks.

It’s important for victims involved in such unfortunate incidents to know these four fundamental elements: Duty, Breach of Duty, Causation and Damages. These elements play pivotal roles when it comes down pointing out who was reckless or negligent causing the accident and subsequently attributing liable claims with it.

The aftermath of an accident brings along unforeseen challenges like mounting medical bills without steady income due to inability to work whilst battling physical pain alongside emotional trauma. We pride ourselves on providing targeted assistance not just in claiming compensation for immediate medical costs but also considering parameters like prolonged treatment requirements, rehabilitation costs or even compensation for suffering endured by loved ones due negligence causing horrific life-changing implications.

When you choose Carlson B—a renowned Illinois-based personal injury attorney group—you’re not only banking upon years of dedicated experience towards fighting justice for victims of pedestrian accidents but also indomitable commitment towards standing up against powerful entities if needed. Rest assured knowing we tirelessly seek to establish liability against all at-fault parties and demand fair compensation that encapsulates every aspect related to injuries, losses or suffering faced as an aftermath of the accident.

At Carlson Bier, we are equipped with a thorough understanding of the unique laws surrounding pedestrian accidents in Illinois. This combined with our unhindered dedication in pursuit of justice allows us to support victims strategically from initial claim process right up-to confrontation in court if necessary, while consistently communicating possible options or outcomes.

By availing our legal expertise for pursuing rightful compensations after a traumatic pedestrian accident means always having staunch supporters ready to navigate complexities while ensuring your interests are never compromised.

Did you know that you could gain exclusive insights about potential value linked with your case absolutely free? Yes, it’s true! We are indeed passionate not only practicing law but also empowering each deserving individual make informed choices. Therefore, don’t wait any longer–click on the button below now–discover what your case could be worth by engaging esteemed attorneys from Carlson Bier who believe every victim deserves holistic justice beyond just immediate medical expenses after pedestrian accidents! Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise – because this is about YOU and YOUR rights. Trust us, it’s time for action now!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Oak Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Oak Park

Areas of Practice in Oak Park

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Burn Traumas

Giving skilled legal support for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Medical Carelessness

Offering experienced legal assistance for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Obligation

Taking on cases involving problematic products, delivering expert legal help to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Abuse

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble & Trip Injuries

Skilled in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking compensation for their harm.

Birth Harms

Extending legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Incidents: Dedicated to supporting victims of car accidents get appropriate settlement for wounds and damages.

Scooter Incidents

Specializing in providing representation for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Semi Crash

Delivering adept legal representation for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for losses.

Building Collisions

Committed to representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Neurological Impairments

Expert in delivering expert legal assistance for persons suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Wounds

Specialized in tackling cases for persons who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Expert in legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unjust Death

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and professional legal representation to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Committed to defending clients with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​