FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Oakland

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When the aftermath of a dog bite injury is leaving you overwhelmed, it’s crucial to have an expert attorney standing by your side. At Carlson Bier, we hold years of proficiency in handling complex dog bite injury claims and securing justice for our clients. Respected throughout Oakland for uncompromised commitment and meticulous casework, we are your trusted ally even when the stakes are high. Our multi-jurisdictional awareness equips us with strategies rooted deeply into Illinois law allowing us to pursue successful outcomes beyond geographical borders. We understand that no two cases are alike hence, every case receives personalized attention from attorneys highly skilled in evaluating the multitude of factors impacting a claim’s value – from liability issues to medical expenses and impairment suffered by victims.

Carlson Bier meticulously investigates each situation crafting robust legal arguments tailored just right to ensure optimum compensation results swiftly. More than representation, what you receive at Carlson Bier is unwavering dedication towards achieving your best interests; proof that we truly take pride in turning tables favorably for our clients who experience dog bite injuries .

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Oakland Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier – your reliable legal partners in Illinois, specializing in personal injury law including Dog Bite Injuries. Experiencing a dog bite can be traumatizing and depending on the extent of the injury, it could have long-term physical and emotional repercussions. Our dedicated attorneys will guide you through the process of claiming damages caused by these unfortunate incidents.

Dog bites can lead to hospitalization, rehabilitation therapy, plastic surgery for disfigurement, psychological counseling among many other treatment courses. Beyond the physical injury and medical costs, victims might suffer from Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), loss of earnings due to healing time-off work or even face difficulty securing future employment due to scarring or disfigurement. It is imperative that victims understand their lawful rights and potential compensations:

• Medical Expenses: You are entitled to claim compensation for all immediate as well as future anticipated medical expenses.

• Pain & Suffering: Dog attacks inflict immense mental anguish which should factor into your claims.

• Loss of Income: If your injuries keep you away from professionally performing as before – temporarily or permanently – you are entitled to recover lost wages.

At Carlson Bier our attorneys offer an empathetic approach coupled with extensive knowledge about state laws regarding animal attacks. The State of Illinois adheres strictly to a statute holding one liable for any injury inflicted by their pet regardless if they were aware about this vicious tendency beforehand or not. This evolves from ‘strict liability’ rule under subsection 16 of Section 5/2-619 motions according to Code Civil Procedure Act in Illinois law framework.

Nevertheless seeking damages involves procedural intricacies like reporting timelines adherence upholding evidentiary standards before demanding compensation from involved parties all while taking into account insurance company constraints limitations possibly offered settlement figures too! Claim processes require diligent follow-up comprehensive understanding upon vicarious variables such interpreting court orders responding appropriate defenses thus ensuring best possible outcomes clients navigating successfully round loopholes posed beforehand by opposite parties.

At Carlson Bier, our approach commences from empathetically understanding your situation, building a robust case strategy strengthened with substantial evidence and effective representation in court for securing the rightful damages you deserve. Our legal proficiency spans over dealing with insurance companies who aim to minimize their liability by offering low settlements or blaming victims for provocation – we ensure they don’t succeed in these tactics against our clients.

As one of Illinois’ premier personal injury law firms, we believe that each client’s needs are unique and deserving of focused attention. Our attorneys avow to standing strong on your behalf influencing positively on monumental decisions pertaining claim value settlement timelines preparing meticulously defending powerfully before judges juries if necessary! Rest assured knowing having served hundreds like-minded individuals family within community fighting tooth nail making sure rights aren’t suppressed voices get heard under any circumstances whatsoever.

The aftermath as a victim of dog bite may leave you inundated with challenges – medical, emotional and financial. By trusting us at Carlson Bier, you will be allowing an experienced hand to handle the convolutions associated with legal proceedings while you concentrate on recuperation free of such hassles. All being said, it is important to remember that not all lawyers carrying the same experiences competencies – deciding upon right attorney plays crucial role leveraging situations favorably towards successful closure compensation claims! Scale up this opportunity now– click the button below to find out what your case could potentially be worth and take your first step towards healing through justice today.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Oakland Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Oakland

Areas of Practice in Oakland

Cycling Incidents

Focused on legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or perilous conditions.

Flame Burns

Offering professional legal assistance for victims of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Medical Malpractice

Extending professional legal representation for patients affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Liability

Addressing cases involving faulty products, offering professional legal support to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Abuse

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Fall and Trip Incidents

Specialist in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking recovery for their damages.

Childbirth Injuries

Delivering legal assistance for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Mishaps

Mishaps: Focused on aiding victims of car accidents gain appropriate recompense for damages and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Committed to providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Truck Mishap

Providing specialist legal assistance for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for harms.

Building Site Collisions

Committed to assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Head Harms

Committed to ensuring professional legal assistance for patients suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Damages

Adept at addressing cases for persons who have suffered harms from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Committed to legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unjust Demise

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and adept legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Trauma

Dedicated to representing individuals with vertebral damage, offering expert legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​