Personal Injury Attorney in Oakland

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the complex field of Personal Injury law, Carlson Bier stands as a beacon of expertise and excellence. Carlson Bier holds an unshakeable commitment to safeguarding victims’ rights; offering personalized legal services tailored to meet distinct circumstances surrounding Personal Injury cases. Whatever the scenario- from vehicular accidents, slip-and-fall events to workplace injuries in Oakland–Carlson Bier is your champion for justice. Our prolific team boasts vast experience managing high stake cases while ensuring optimal client satisfaction. Compassionate yet tenacious in advocacy, we ardently work towards securing maximum compensation that corresponds with incurred damages firmly upholding our relentless pursuit for fairness. Choosing Carlson Bier means entwining with integrity, capability and erudition depth attracting clientele spanning far beyond Illinois boundaries into multiple jurisdictions including Oakland because when it comes to personal injury litigation – distance doesn’t deflate dedication! So trust us: seek professional consultation with Carlson Bier today as you navigate through these challenging times powered by personal attention infused with top-tier professionalism reiterating why we are undeniably your ideal choice when seeking sound legal support within the realm of personal injury litigations.

About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in Oakland Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, committed advocates for individuals who have suffered personal injury due to the negligence or misconduct of others in Illinois. Personal injury law, often referred to as tort law, holds accountable those responsible for causing harm through their unthoughtful actions or lackadaisical carelessness.

• The primary intent that undergirds personal injury law is a resolution and compensation for victims suffering from injuries.

• Its foundational principle rests on providing justice when someone’s harmful conduct inflicts undue damage on another individual.

At Carlson Bier, we devote our complete attention and allocate extensive resources toward securing maximum recovery on your behalf. Understanding every case has its nuances; we work with you closely to understand your individual scenario and meticulously build a compelling legal strategy highlighting essential aspects unique to your situation.

When dealing with personal injuries, various kinds can happen across diverse situations:

1) Motor vehicular accidents – Highlighted primarily by car accidents but also consists of motorcycles incidents, truck mishaps or pedestrian hits.

2) Work-related Injuries – these involve scenarios where an employee gets injured at his workplace due to inadequate safety measures.

3) Medical Malpractice – hapless victims face dire repercussions due to medical negligence like misdiagnosis, botched surgeries or improper treatment.

4) Premises Liability – entails instances wherein an individual gets hurt within someone else’s property due to poor maintenance or lax security protocols.

In each case type above, underlying issues often get complex quickly since deciphering causation and liability issues require professional expertise that Carlson Bier brings onboard. We stand firmly equipped to navigate you through intricate laws while dedicating relentless efforts aiming at obtaining just compensation for losses incurred because of such injurious incidents. From bracing against deceptive insurance company tactics attempting lower settlements than deserved up until representing you in court if necessary—we guard your rights vehemently every step of way.

Irrespective of which personal injury case type it is—whether arising from vehicular accidents, work-related mishaps, medical faulty conduct, or premises liabilities—our dedicated team takes prompt action and remains fully committed to your cause from the day of engagement until final resolution.

Bringing us onboard does not merely mean legal representation; it entails fostering an association that allows you room to focus on recovery while we relentlessly pursue justice. Our rich background of handling various personal injury cases combined with a relentless pursuit for maximal compensation provides assurance and peace of mind in otherwise distressing times.

Now that you’re more familiar with our operational aspects underpinning personal injury law, we’re here to help navigate these turbulent waters effectively. While every circumstance is unique, remember, at stake are essential things like accruing medical bills, loss of income during sickness duration, potential future wage losses due to disability and not excluding mental anguish faced consistently.

Are you or someone dear battling ramifications resulting from a personal injury incident? You may be eligible for obtaining compensation aiding recovery both distinctly and holistically. Instead of feeling overwhelmed trying guessing potential case worth—trust experts who have stood by numerous individuals navigating through similar predicament successfully over years.

Remember misery isn’t selective—it can choose anyone as its companion—now decide if it should be allowed leaving behind lasting marks long after initial tragedy?

Do click on the button below right away! Let’s find out how much your case worth might potentially be together. This won’t merely bring embarked justice closer but initiate crucial steps towards rebuilding life just as imagined before untimely adversity decided casting sizable dark shadows. Carlson Bier firmly believe—you haven’t fought this hard to only get so far; let’s continue journey together ensuring favorable outcomes finally hopefully bringing back smiles forgotten perhaps momentarily!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Oakland Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Oakland

Areas of Practice in Oakland

Cycling Collisions

Proficient in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Giving adept legal assistance for victims of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Ensuring expert legal advice for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Fault

Managing cases involving unsafe products, supplying specialist legal assistance to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Neglect

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Trip & Fall Injuries

Adept in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking justice for their damages.

Childbirth Harms

Extending legal assistance for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Collisions

Incidents: Committed to supporting sufferers of car accidents receive appropriate payout for injuries and impairment.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Dedicated to providing representation for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Big Rig Mishap

Extending adept legal advice for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for harms.

Building Site Crashes

Concentrated on defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Cerebral Damages

Focused on ensuring expert legal advice for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Traumas

Specialized in addressing cases for persons who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Dedicated to legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unfair Loss

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and skilled legal services to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Injury

Focused on representing patients with backbone trauma, offering professional legal services to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer