...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Oakwood Hills

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating the aftermath of a dog bite injury can be complex and daunting. Your optimal recourse is to align with a top-tier professional legal firm, such as Carlson Bier, renowned for their expertise in handling Dog Bite Injuries cases. Despite being based regionally within Illinois state boundaries, they possess an unshakeable dedication to serve victims across diverse locales including Oakwood Hills. Their proficient attorneys adeptly guide injured individuals through convoluted legal processes while ardently advocating for rightful compensation on their behalf. With the myriad emotional turmoil and physical pain you may endure following such a traumatic incident, trust that Carlson Bier will provide compassionate care coupled with aggressive representation against involved parties or insurance companies reticent in providing just compensation. If you’ve had the misfortune of becoming victim to dog bite-related harm requiring astute legal counsel familiar with Oakwood Hills’ specific regulations and precedents — think no further than Carlson Bier; your trusted partners throughout this trying ordeal.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Oakwood Hills Illinois

Website Content:

At the law firm of Carlson Bier, we are dedicated personal injury attorneys with a focus on providing comprehensive legal representation to victims of dog bite injuries throughout Illinois. We understand that incidents involving dog bites can be traumatic and potentially life-altering, especially when significant physical or psychological damage is inflicted. That’s why we offer our vast knowledge of Illinois law, coupled with empathetic counsel and relentless advocacy for our clients’ rights.

Dog bite injuries may have severe consequences such as painful wounds, infections, disfigurement and even long-term emotional trauma. They may also trigger complicated medical procedures which can result in sky-rocketing expenses. As personal injury lawyers specializing in this area, we believe it’s crucial to educate you about the legal implication surrounding these types of incidents.

• Not all dog owners are immediately liable: The mere fact that their dog bit someone isn’t enough for them to be held responsible under Illinois law.

• The victim must not have provoked the attack: If it’s proven that your actions provoked the dog in any way might cause problems with your case.

• Trespassing rules apply: For a successful claim, it needs to be shown you were lawfully present at the location where the incident took place.

Navigating through these intricacies requires thorough understanding and application of various laws including The Animal Control Act in Illinois which discusses owner liability in more detail. At Carlson Bier, our experienced attorneys use sophisticated strategies and practical approaches to attain favorable results for victims affected by dog bite incidents.

We aim liberate you from stress following a traumatic incident by assuaging concerns regarding potential costs incurred after suffering from a severe dog bite injury. When choosing us as your personal injury offices, rest assured that payment would only become due once compensation is received as part of a successful claim resolution – it’s what is typically referred to as ‘No Win No Fee’ policy.

Our firm has years of practice dedicated to personal injury law. Our commitment is unwavering, ensuring each client receives personalized attention from beginning to end of their case. By combining our legal insight with compassion for the circumstances of our clients, we strive relentlessly to secure the compensation you deserve.

Suffering from a dog bite can be a harrowing experience, often leaving victims in dire need of legal guidance as they fight for justice and aim towards recovery. Therefore, should you or your loved one ever find themselves being victimized by such incident in Illinois, Carlson Bier is prepared to extend its professional grip over your situation.

Together, let’s take firm steps against negligent pet owners who cause irresponsible harm; our strength lies not just within protecting your rights during this challenging time, but also pursuing maximum restitution for incurred medical expenses lost wages and other damages linked to the devastating incident. We pledge our servitude towards making this journey less strenuous so that you focus on what matters most – recuperating peaceably while knowing that justice will be served accordingly.

You don’t have become another statistic; arm yourself with knowledge and powerful representation against those liable for dog bite injuries. As each case holds unique aspects which could influence potential outcomes and settlement amounts aren’t standard – they vary extensively based upon specifics related each unique situation.

Our final suggestion is simple: Learn about how much your specific case may actually be worth by clicking on the button below for free consultation. You’re under no obligation whatsoever yet taking this step might provide invaluable insights into aspects surrounding your case including potential claim value derived from complex calculations involving liability percentage assumptions and distinctive personal considerations surrounding repercussions affected by the unfortunate event.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Oakwood Hills Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Oakwood Hills

Areas of Practice in Oakwood Hills

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Dedicated to legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Fire Burns

Providing skilled legal help for individuals of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Medical Misconduct

Providing experienced legal advice for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, supplying professional legal guidance to customers affected by harmful products.

Elder Malpractice

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Stumble Occurrences

Adept in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking justice for their harm.

Birth Traumas

Delivering legal aid for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Collisions: Committed to aiding sufferers of car accidents secure just recompense for injuries and impairment.

Motorbike Crashes

Focused on providing legal services for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Trucking Crash

Ensuring professional legal advice for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for losses.

Construction Site Mishaps

Committed to advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Brain Impairments

Focused on ensuring compassionate legal support for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Specialized in tackling cases for clients who have suffered harms from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Accidents

Focused on legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Undeserved Death

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and adept legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Neural Injury

Committed to assisting persons with backbone trauma, offering expert legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​