...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Onarga

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with dog bite injuries in Onarga, the proficient handling of an adept personal injury attorney becomes crucial. That’s where Carlson Bier steps in, offering unparalleled legal expertise enabled by years of experience in resolving intricate cases related to dog bite injuries. We believe in empowering our clients and ensuring that they get the lawful compensation they are entitled to for medical bills or psychological trauma inflicted by such unfortunate events. With a profound understanding of Illinois law intricacies, we meticulously evaluate each case to derive outcomes most favorable for those enduring the aftermath of a vicious dog attack. At Carlson Bier, we take pride not just as providers but crusaders committed towards safeguarding your rights within the justice system from inception till verdict. Our commitment towards resonating with your strife against unwarranted adversities has earned us substantial recognition amongst peers and public alike; placing us at top-notch reference for skilfully navigating through complex terrains exclusive to dog-bite incidents- especially those occurring around Onarga area clientele.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Onarga Illinois

At the renowned Carlson Bier law firm, we understand that a dog bite injury is beyond physical pain. It often leaves an emotional scar and substantial medical bills, leading to devastating consequences for victims. Our objective, as your committed personal injury attorneys in Illinois, is to ensure you comprehend every facet of dog bite injuries and walk with you each step of the way, unraveling the complexity of legal proceedings.

Dog bites can cause significant harm such as puncture wounds, facial scarring, nerve damage, infection risks or even psychological trauma. Such injuries may require extensive treatments including surgical interventions and rehabilitative therapy in serious cases; it isn’t unusual for costs to escalate quickly. As part of our mission to bring immense value and relief to our valued clients like yourself dealing with dog bite incidents’, we provide comprehensive counsel on these issues.

– **Liability Breach:** Primarily important in this regard is understanding who’s liable for your dog bite injury. In Illinois under the ‘Animal Control Act’, if a person suffers an animal attack or injury in such an event where they’re conducting themselves peacefully at any location then the animal owner should be held strictly responsible.

– **Statute Of Limitations:** This refers to time limits set by law within which actions must be taken. As per Illinois law’s statute of limitations dictates that you have two years from the day of incident occurrence to file a personal injury lawsuit against the culprit party for a dog bite case.

– **Insurance Concerns:** Often times homeowner insurance policies cover damages caused by pets belonging to policyholders up until certain limits based on policy details.

Here at Carlson Bier, navigating these elements are second nature; we meticulously scour all aspects related with your case ensuring maximum compensation receive due diligence within a reasonable time-frame.

Let us guide you gracefully though intricate mechanisms involved so attention can remain focused on recovery while we take care of burdensome legalities associated with claiming due recompense. We believe, an informed client is a triumphant one; that’s why we’re steadfast in our commitment to furnish you with all pertinent facts about dog bite injuries by taking the guesswork out of processes involved.

In light of compensatory damages brought about by dog bite injuries; there may be more than just direct medical expenses incurred. The court could also grant compensation for lost wages during recovery and future loss earning potential resulting from disability due to the injury as well as non-economic damages which cover pain suffered, emotional distress and reduced quality of life amongst other factors. All these play a vital role in making victims whole again after such traumatizing events.

With Carlson Bier as your legal advocate, combined with Illinois laws favoring dog bite victims, you stand a high chance of realizing your rightful claim regardless the circumstances leading up to attack. Our past accolades bear testimony to this.

Still grappling with indecisiveness? Doubtful over what this legal battle might cost you? Don’t let apprehensions cast shadows on your mind when it comes to fighting for justice in such grave incidents because at Carlson Bier we operate under ‘No win No fee’ standard; meaning unless successful at pursuing legitimate compensation due our clients – there won’t be any legal charges forwarded whatsoever!

We take pride in empowering our clients through factual knowledge regarding dog bite injuries and remain ever ready to fight fiercely till end ensuring justice served adequately without compromises made along way. Click on the button below now – find out what exactly your case worth!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Onarga Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Onarga

Areas of Practice in Onarga

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Dedicated to legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Flame Traumas

Giving adept legal support for patients of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Healthcare Negligence

Providing experienced legal representation for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Fault

Addressing cases involving faulty products, extending skilled legal services to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Neglect

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip & Fall Incidents

Professional in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking recovery for their damages.

Childbirth Damages

Supplying legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Incidents: Concentrated on assisting victims of car accidents secure just recompense for harms and losses.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Committed to providing representation for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Big Rig Incident

Extending expert legal advice for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for harms.

Building Mishaps

Focused on defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Head Damages

Focused on offering expert legal representation for persons suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Damages

Specialized in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Expert in legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Unjust Passing

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and experienced legal guidance to ensure redress.

Backbone Injury

Expert in defending individuals with vertebral damage, offering professional legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​