Wrongful Death Attorney in Onarga

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Dealing with the profound loss of a family member is an emotionally taxing event, and it can be even more challenging when that death occurred due to someone else’s negligence. Carlson Bier, renowned for providing compassionate representation in Wrongful Death cases, stands ready to provide high-quality legal support during these times of sorrow. Esteemed as a leading Illinois lawyer firm specializing in Personal Injury law and wrongful death claims, our team empathizes deeply with your grief while also working relentlessly on your behalf. Outstripping peers with expertise honed over many years handling complex litigation matters related to wrongful deaths; we help ensure fair compensation is realized for tragic losses you’ve sustained. Aware that no monetary reimbursement can replace a lost life—our aim at Carlson Bier remains restoring some balance into affected lives by procuring amounts suitable for covering bereavement costs, future earnings capacity loss, medical bills left behind and other damages designed under Illinois state law provisions. Put simply; if you need sound navigation through the jagged waters of a Wrongful Death claim—your prudent choice remains Carlson Bier.

About Carlson Bier

Wrongful Death Lawyers in Onarga Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in cases of personal injury – one of the most devastating forms of which is wrongful death. This occurs when a person loses their life due to the negligence or misconduct of another individual or entity. The aftermath of these harrowing circumstances often compels loved ones left behind to seek justice and duly deserved compensation for their substantial loss.

Wrongful death claims can emanate from various scenarios:

– Automobile accidents caused by a negligent driver.

– Medical malpractice where medical professionals fail in their duty care.

– Work-related fatalities occurring from unsafe practices at work.

– Products liability involving faulty or dangerous products leading to death.

In pursuing a claim for Wrongful Death, it’s crucial to understand that different factors play into determining its viability and potential worth. An experienced team like ours could be an invaluable ally through this process.

Here are some key considerations:

• Negligence: The plaintiff must prove the defendant’s reckless behavior directly resulted in the victim’s death.

• Survival Claims: In addition to filing for wrongful death, family members may file survival claims for damages suffered by the deceased prior to passing away.

• Statute of Limitations: Lawsuits filed after two years from the date of death may not be heard by Illinois courts due to statute limitations unless special circumstances apply.

The impact of losing a loved one transcends emotional boundaries; it also extends far into financial implications too. Therefore, families should know they could potentially recover certain types of damages, including but not limited to:

– Loss companionship

– Sorrow and mental suffering

– Wealth measured according to earning capacity

Our commitment resonates with every case we take on; hence our lawyers work tirelessly to ensure your rights are defended fiercely throughout proceedings. By trusting us with your case, you’re receiving expert guidance backed by comprehensive legal insight, heartening compassion matched by unyielding persistence – all focused towards obtaining maximum compensation for your unparalleled loss.

Wrongful death claims often involve complex litigation processes and tough negotiation – aspects we at Carlson Bier understand profoundly. We know what it takes to build a strong case that can withstand the rigors of the courtroom. Our team also acknowledges the unique challenges such scenarios can hand out; hence, client-centered service stands as one of our highlights.

Trying times ought not to find you right-shifted from justice or dealing with daunting legal matters alone. Allow us to stand beside you in this journey—as experienced guides, strategic planners, iterative adjusters, yet complete human beings who feel your cut deeply.

Why compromise when it comes to something so incredibly sensitive yet significant? Trust a firm that has evolved through won conflicts and real experience—trust Carlson Bier.

And as we draw these explorations into rightful closure for now—you don’t have to be in apprehensive suspension anymore about assessing your claim’s worth. Start today by clicking on the button below; let us help discover just how much your wrongful death claim could potentially amount to. Remember – there’s absolutely no obligation or cost involved until we win your case!

Discover solace not merely as an abstract idea but as tangible relief carved by diligent work, tireless commitment, genuine empathy — delivered by a law group guarding personal injury cases zealously: Carlson Bier.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Onarga Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Wrongful Death FAQ​

Wrongful death occurs when a person’s death is caused by the negligence or recklessness of another person.

The following people may be able to file a wrongful death lawsuit:

  • The spouse or children of the deceased
  • The parents of the deceased
  • The siblings of the deceased
  • The personal representative of the deceased’s estate

To prove a wrongful death claim in Illinois, the plaintiff must prove the following elements:

  • The defendant owed the deceased a duty of care.
  • The defendant breached that duty of care.
  • The breach of duty caused the death of the deceased.
  • The plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the death of the deceased.

In a wrongful death lawsuit in Illinois, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Pecuniary damages: These damages are designed to compensate the plaintiff for the financial losses they have suffered as a result of the death of the deceased. This could include lost wages, medical expenses, and funeral expenses.
  • Non-pecuniary damages: These damages are designed to compensate the plaintiff for the non-financial losses they have suffered as a result of the death of the deceased. This could include pain and suffering, loss of consortium, and loss of parental guidance.

The statute of limitations for wrongful death lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the death to file a lawsuit.

If you have any questions about your legal rights or options after a wrongful death, you should contact an experienced wrongful death attorney.

All Attorney Services in Onarga

Areas of Practice in Onarga

Cycling Mishaps

Expert in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or risky conditions.

Fire Damages

Offering adept legal services for people of intense burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Hospital Carelessness

Delivering experienced legal support for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Liability

Handling cases involving defective products, delivering specialist legal services to clients affected by faulty goods.

Elder Abuse

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble and Tumble Accidents

Specialist in handling trip accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking restitution for their suffering.

Birth Wounds

Offering legal support for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Incidents: Focused on aiding victims of car accidents secure fair recompense for wounds and destruction.

Scooter Crashes

Specializing in providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Semi Accident

Extending experienced legal services for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for injuries.

Construction Mishaps

Focused on defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Neurological Harms

Dedicated to offering specialized legal services for patients suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Damages

Adept at addressing cases for victims who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Crashes

Expert in legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unjust Demise

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and experienced legal support to ensure fairness.

Neural Impairment

Focused on defending individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal services to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer