...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Oquawka

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with tumultuous dog bite injuries, it’s essential to secure qualified and experienced legal representation. Carlson Bier is the exemplary choice in this sphere of personal injury law. Their acquired wealth of knowledge and sterling reputation within Illinois sets them apart as a compelling advocate for victims suffering from canine-inflicted harm. Having represented countless individuals recover medical expenses, lost wages, and pain & suffering damages due to dog bites – their track record speaks volumes about their unwavering dedication towards clients’ interests. In the field as complex and nuanced as Dog Bite Injury Law; mastery over legislation nuances, negotiation prowess with insurers, meticulous preparation for possible litigation are indispensable assets; traits practiced by Carlson Bier diligently every day. They strive tirelessly to maximize your compensation while understanding that each case comes with unique circumstances requiring intelligent strategic planning; a principle upon which their service is built round-the-clock support designed keeping client’s convenience in focus assures every call made to Carlson Bier matters significantly when you need assistance the most- presenting just one more reason why they are undoubtedly an ideal ally on your path to justice.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Oquawka Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that dog bite injuries can be traumatic and devastating. As a premier personal injury law firm based in Illinois, our committed team of seasoned attorneys specialize in providing legal assistance to victims of dog attacks. When you or a loved one suffers from a dog bite, there are several key factors that should immediately come into play.

Firstly, it is essential to seek prompt medical attention. Dog bites may lead to severe injuries such as nerve damage, infections, or even psychological trauma such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). It’s not only important for your health but documenting your injuries medically can also greatly impact the outcome of your case.

Secondly, document the incident meticulously. If possible, gather the contact information of witnesses and take photographs of your injuries and the location where the attack happened. This will serve as invaluable evidence demonstrating exactly what occurred.

Thirdly, report the incident to local animal control authorities who will conduct their investigation which plays a significant role in proving liability.

Dog-owners have a responsibility under Illinois state law to prevent their dogs from causing harm to other individuals. Failing this duty opens them up to potential legal repercussions including liability for any damages inflicted by their canine companions. To establish liability against a dog owner in Illinois, you are simply required to prove that you were attacked or injured by their pet without provoking it – unlike some states that have adopted ‘one-bite rule,’ ensuring owners get one-time immunity before being held accountable.

Among many benefits representing clients with Carlson Bier include:

• Wealth of experience: Prosecuting dog bite cases requires an in-depth understanding of both laws relating specifically to dogs as well unique insurance issues inherent with these claims.

• Extensive resources: We’re equipped with investigative tools necessary for building strong cases which optimize opportunities for significant compensation.

• Result-oriented representation: Our dedication lies within fighting relentlessly on behalf our clients while endeavouring utmost results concerning settlements or verdicts.

It is important to remember that you have rights. While some might downplay the seriousness of a dog bite injury, we at Carlson Bier understand its potential severity. Not only can it leave physical scars, but emotional ones too. It’s our team’s commitment to not only ensure justice, but also manage your claim professionally while prioritizing your recovery.

In Illinois, victims of dog bites are entitled to recover damages for not just medical expenses associated with wound treatments or surgeries required post-attack but also lost wages during convalescence and even an allotment for pain and suffering experienced.

We pride ourselves in caring about our clientele’s welfare as much as winning their case—a valued attribute which has led us in becoming one of the leading law firms within Illinois providing exceptional legal services relating to personal injuries induced by canine attacks.

In conclusion, if you’ve fallen prey to a negligent dog owner causing harm either directly or indirectly—we encourage you needn’t bear consequences alone silently. Let Carlson Bier be your committed advocate who comprehends intricacies revolving around these unique cases’ prosecution backed by far-reaching resources plus wealth of experience bettering odds pertaining substantial compensation.

Before leaving our page though—take that crucial step right now. Uncovering opportunities towards rightful compensation starts from understanding what exactly your case is worth, and we here lies ability making that precise assessment—you’ll find a button below this passage standing as your gateway towards discovering this value laying behind ensuring secondary victimization doesn’t add onto trauma ensuing a regrettable incident such as a traumatizing attack caused by man’s best friend proceeding wrong.

We request clicking through it ushering in path advancing pact against injustice levied upon yourself—the first yet most vital step equating reclaiming control following profound unsettling event like enduring torment via Dog Bite-Let’s walk hand-in-hand along routes surmounting aftermaths together seeking due justice where rightful.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Oquawka Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Oquawka

Areas of Practice in Oquawka

Bicycle Collisions

Dedicated to legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Fire Traumas

Offering adept legal assistance for patients of grave burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Hospital Incompetence

Delivering experienced legal representation for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Liability

Managing cases involving problematic products, delivering adept legal services to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Aged Misconduct

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Trip and Fall Accidents

Specialist in managing trip accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking redress for their losses.

Childbirth Damages

Offering legal support for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Crashes

Mishaps: Concentrated on supporting patients of car accidents get appropriate settlement for harms and harm.

Scooter Crashes

Focused on providing legal assistance for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Trucking Crash

Providing experienced legal assistance for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for damages.

Building Site Accidents

Concentrated on supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Head Injuries

Focused on ensuring professional legal advice for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Harms

Specialized in tackling cases for people who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Death

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and professional legal support to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Specializing in defending individuals with paralysis, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer