FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Oreana

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

For residents of Oreana, encountering a dog bite injury can be a frightening and overwhelming experience. Not only are you dealing with physical pain, but there may also be severe emotional trauma and financial stress. Carlson Bier’s dedicated team of personal injury attorneys possess expertise specifically in dog bite injuries, spearheading countless successful cases within Illinois. We understand the complexity of such occurrences involving medical costs, liability investigations, and insurance negotiations. Our commitment to addressing these concerns ensures that our clients receive the best possible legal representation while they focus on recovery. With an impressive track record in securing high-value settlements for clients who have fallen victim to canine attacks, we pride ourselves on our empathetic approach blended with aggressive litigation strategies when necessary.

Deciding upon your legal advocate following a distressing incident is crucial; it directly impacts the restitution you might recover from your ordeal.

In choosing Carlson Bier as your attorney group you choose excellence– we do not just fight for rights but to amplify the truth behind every case – why should victims bear burden alone? Choose justice without compromise-choose Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Oreana Illinois

Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury attorney group based in Illinois, is highly skilled and experienced in dealing with cases of various magnitudes, including those pertaining to dog bite injuries. Each year, numerous individuals fall victim to dog bite injuries, many of which result in substantial medical bills, loss of wages due to recovery periods, physical pain, and emotional trauma. At Carlson Bier, we firmly believe that you should be adequately compensated for your unwarranted hardship.

A critical aspect often overlooked concerning dog bite injuries is that they are not just limited to physical harm. The psychological implications resulting from such an incident can be profound and may require therapy or counselling sessions adding onto the increasing pile of burdensome costs already incurred from medical treatments. Additionally, victims might need time away from work during recovery or even face job loss as a consequence of long-term impairment caused by severe injury.

Key points about dog bite injury law in Illinois:

• The state follows the “strict liability” rule when it comes to dog bites. This means that if a pet owner’s animal attacks someone unprovoked on public property or lawfully on private property (whether owned by the pet owner or not), they are liable for damages.

• private properties include any situation where you were expressly invited onto premises owned by another individual.

• Illinois’ statute of limitations normally allows two years from the date of an accident for a lawsuit filing.

As well established attorneys represented across Illinois state (not just one city) — but notably *not* located in Oreana — Carlson Bier assures clients unmatched expertise and dedication towards achieving desirable outcomes notwithstanding how complex their case may seem. We make sure thorough investigations are handled properly; examining whether there was any negligence involved on part of the dog’s handler at the time of attack our professionals meticulously assess your unique circumstances while guiding through every step thereby ensuring comprehension behind all legal mechanisms involved during this process.

In adherence with Illinois law, we’ve streamlined our firm’s reach solely intrastate; and so, we aim at equipping clients with optimal resources towards overcoming their adversities. Our professional excellence is reflected in involving expert testimony when required, safeguarding your interests during negotiations for a settlement and potentially taking your case to trial against the party found to be responsible.

Remember, it’s not just about filing a claim; it’s about receiving just recompense that will help you cover all incurred expenses and facilitate recovery without additional financial stress. By trusting us with your plight, you are granting yourself the chance of turning this unfortunate event around effectively. Your health and well-being are paramount; let Carlson Bier put its legal expertise for dog bite injuries into action ensuring no stones left unturned as we pursue rightful compensation on behalf of victims like you who deserve nothing but justice.

It’s said actions speak louder than words or virtual visits which is why we encourage those facing personal injury dilemmas particularly linked with dog bite incidents in Illinois state to interact directly with us — consider allowing us an opportunity to genuinely aid by clicking on the button below. Let real actions from our team define how much value and weight your case indeed holds within this judicial system together being able to scrutinize overall cost-implications possibly arising out of such circumstances hand-in-hand emerging victorious! Click now, find out what your case is worth because absolutely nobody deserves unjust suffering especially resulting due to other’s negligence.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Oreana Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Oreana

Areas of Practice in Oreana

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Fire Traumas

Giving expert legal services for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Physician Misconduct

Providing dedicated legal support for patients affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Obligation

Handling cases involving unsafe products, delivering specialist legal help to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Neglect

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble and Fall Occurrences

Expert in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking redress for their damages.

Neonatal Harms

Providing legal support for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Accidents

Crashes: Devoted to assisting patients of car accidents gain just settlement for injuries and destruction.

Motorbike Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal support for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Big Rig Crash

Ensuring professional legal assistance for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for injuries.

Building Site Crashes

Focused on advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Brain Injuries

Focused on extending dedicated legal advice for persons suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Injuries

Expertise in addressing cases for persons who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Committed to legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Unjust Passing

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and professional legal representation to ensure compensation.

Neural Damage

Specializing in representing individuals with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440