...

Bicycle Accidents in Orland Hills

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Carlson Bier, a leading law firm in Illinois, is renowned for its excellent bicycle accidents expertise. Having successfully represented a multitude of clients involved in bicycle mishaps throughout the region, their mastery of personal injury law stands unparalleled. Any resident of Orland Hills reckoning with the aftermath of an unfortunate biking incident can benefit greatly from our lawyers’ experience and acumen. Committed to safeguarding your rights and ensuring you receive due compensation for your hardships, Carlson Bier adeptly navigates through the complexities that tend to accompany bike accident cases. Our vast knowledge surrounding local statutes pertaining to cyclist safety ensures we are well-prepared to advocate fiercely on behalf of affected cyclists confronting legal conflicts after their ordeal. Engaging the services of Carlson Bier implies entrusting proven professionals who prioritize client satisfaction above everything else while aspiring always towards delivering exemplary results constituted by justice served and damages recuperated effectively.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Orland Hills Illinois

Carlson Bier is an esteemed group of personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, delivering expert legal representation to victims of bicycle accidents. Operating with a deep respect for the law and a steadfast commitment to your rights, we empathetically navigate these complex cases, working relentlessly toward obtaining the justice you deserve.

In any bicycle accident scenario, it’s crucial to understand that these incidents often extend far beyond mundane roadside mishaps. They can pose grave consequences ranging from debilitating injuries to psychological trauma and fiscal liabilities. Bearing this in mind, our proficient team at Carlson Bier puts forth comprehensive expertise ensuring robust legal assistance every step of the way.

One significant area necessitating insightful understanding is negligence attribution – a pivotal element in bicycle accident litigation processes. Negligence typically serves as the bedrock upon which personal injury claims are built; whether its reckless driving or ill-maintained roads contributing towards your unfortunate circumstance, every factor needs meticulous consideration. Our attorneys take comprehensive measures while establishing proof of neglect to solidify your case.

It’s likewise beneficial to comprehend how insurance companies operate following bicycle accidents – usually each driver’s insurer gets involved, complicating matters further. The singular aim then becomes minimizing the payout owed to you by exploiting limited knowledge about law among other tactics aimed at compromising rightful settlements. At Carlson Bier we ensure protection against such predatory practices.

Key aspects pertaining to bicycle accident cases integrated within our legal representation encompass:

– Comprehensive investigation: Exhaustive inquiry into crash circumstances aiming at unearthing contributory negligence on part of multiple entities if applicable.

– Document collection: Procuring police reports, medical records etc which substantiate your claim.

– Expert consultation: Liaisoning with doctors or accident reconstructors if needed adding credence to cause-effect determinations or damage evaluations respectively.

– Trial readiness: Persistence towards fair settlement during negotiation stages without disregarding preparedness for courtroom battle if required.

Our distinctive approach merges aggressive negotiation strategies embedded in facts derived from intensive case analysis with a compassionate understanding of your health and wellness concerns. We acknowledge that cycle accidents not just affect physical wellbeing but impose severe emotional distress along with financial burdens primarily because absence from work during injury-induced downtime militates against regular income.

An essential aspect often overlooked following such mishaps is the statute of limitations – a time-bound constraint post-accident within which you are allowed to file a lawsuit. In Illinois this duration is typically limited to two years for personal injury claims, nonetheless, certain exceptions may apply. Being cognizant about these nuances embedded within legal boundaries forms an integral part of our advisory services for clients ensuring none miss out on deserved compensation due to mere oversight or ignorance.

At Carlson Bier, we prioritize transparent communication and customized strategies aligned with your unique situation alongside unwavering dedication towards achieving maximum compensation encompassing all facets – medical expenses, wage loss, pain and suffering among others.

We firmly believe in empowering you with pivotal information pertaining to cycling accidents bridging gaps between complex law jargons and layman understanding contributing towards better decision making at every stage. With this conviction driving us forward daily, we continue enhancing our endeavors resonating strongly with continuous legal education principles advocated by professional attorney networks globally.

Having presented an overview into bicycle accident cases handled by us at Carlson Bier we encourage your deep-dive exploration into each service element elaborated upon through simple click below. Simply fill in basic details regarding the incident – without stepping outside the comfort of your home you can gain insightful glimpses into worthiness of your claim potentially saving significant deal of time and efforts later while aligning expectations realistically right at the outset.

Take control today – become aware about potential implications surrounding bicycle accidents translating knowledge power into tangible relief through optimal standout representation offered by Carlson Bier – Your Trusted Legal Ally!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Orland Hills Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Orland Hills

Areas of Practice in Orland Hills

Cycling Crashes

Proficient in legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Offering adept legal help for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Hospital Malpractice

Ensuring dedicated legal advice for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Accountability

Handling cases involving unsafe products, offering skilled legal support to clients affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble & Fall Accidents

Skilled in managing trip accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking redress for their harm.

Newborn Wounds

Extending legal help for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Incidents

Accidents: Committed to assisting individuals of car accidents get just remuneration for injuries and harm.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal support for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Truck Collision

Delivering specialist legal advice for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for losses.

Building Incidents

Engaged in assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Brain Impairments

Focused on ensuring specialized legal assistance for persons suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Harms

Specialized in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Committed to legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Death

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and skilled legal support to ensure compensation.

Backbone Trauma

Specializing in supporting victims with spine impairments, offering expert legal services to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer