FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Orland Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to Dog Bite Injuries, the law firm of Carlson Bier leads with a profound understanding and extensive experience. Navigating these unique cases requires not just legal knowledge but also compassion for the trauma involved. Serving Orland Park communities, our attorneys stand ready to vigorously advocate for clients who have suffered from dog bite incidents. What sets us apart is our commitment toward every case; we believe in personalized attention and are resolved to secure compensation commensurate with your injuries exceptionally well. Being conscientious about Illinois laws regarding local advertising, we’re inviting you to reach out digitally or even personally visit us at times that suit you best. When representing victims of Dog Bite Injuries, Carlson Bier brings not only legal acumen but experience-backed strategies designed specifically for this area of law practice—another reason why considering us could be beneficial for your situation. Depend on Carlson Bier where expertise meets empathy when dealing with the aftermath of dog bite incidents.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Orland Park Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are proud to provide top-notch legal services for individuals affected by dog bite injuries in Illinois. Our attorneys have extensive experience, a deep understanding of personal injury law, and the necessary resources to help you navigate through this challenging time.

Dog bites can lead to severe physical trauma mainly puncture wounds, lacerations, infections as well as psychological suffering such as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The victim may require reconstructive surgery and also need extensive counseling which underscores the true horrid impact of dog bite injuries. This type of personal injury is not to be underestimated nor ignored. You shouldn’t have to shoulder the financial burden that comes with such incident – medical bills and lost wages due to recuperation period – especially when another party is responsible.

– Children are particularly vulnerable: Statistically it’s been revealed that children make up a significant proportion of dog bite victims; they are generally less able to protect themselves from an aggressive animal.

– Homeowners Insurance may apply: In many cases, homeowner’s insurance policies cover damages resulting from dog bites perpetrated by the insured person’s pet.

– Immediate actions could shape your case: Important steps need be taken in wake of a dog bite incident such as immediately seeking medical attention regardless severity level of injury; reporting the incident correctly along with securing any possible eyewitness testimony as these play key roles in fortifying your claim legally.

– Dog owner might not always face liability: There are situations when the injured party can be partly or totally held at fault based on circumstances leading up to event e.g., trespassing or provoking the attack intentionally

Every state has specific laws concerning dog bites and related offences. Here in Illinois, we abide by both “One Bite Rule” – where previous dangerous behavior or incidents involving same canine paves way for owner scrutiny alongside ‘Negligence Law’ – often referred under terms” negligence per se” or “common negligence” in legal speak. This directly ties into evaluating owner’s responsibility of preventing harm to anyone interacting with their pet.

At Carlson Bier, relation between the injured party and responsible (negligent) dog owner is pivotal in determining how course of claim plays out; specifically, when victim had a lawful right to be wherever incident occurred such as public parks or invited guests at private premises ensuring they did not provoke animal. Such situations would provide solid ground for securing compensation highlighting failure on part of owners who were unable protect both human beings and pets around them from undue violence.

Our experienced personal injury attorneys are well-versed with tackling complexities that often surround Illinois Dog Bite Laws. We believe providing extensive legal support rooted in empathy, respect can greatly restore sense of safety along with amicably resolving any financial stress associated with your mishap. Every aspect ranging from gathering evidence like medical reviews, witness statements through aggressive advocacy against insurance companies (if need be), expert litigation maneuvers – all part our commitment towards achieving best possible outcome for you.

We understand this is overwhelming phase laden confusion but you don’t have journey alone! The team at Carlson Bier extends invitation take first step towards resolution relief by offering free no-obligation consultation about potential dog bite case. Our priority remains shielding clients maximum level getting deserved justice long term peace mind which truly defines victory. Exclusive focus personal injury cases coupled dedication upholding victim rights separates us rest in Illinois.

To conclude this informational summary on dog bite injuries law within context Illinois state guidelines: Remember always that seeking timely legal help goes beyond just claiming compensations it paves path towards recovery fairness putting entire ordeal behind eventually. Click the button below now find out much your specific might worth let’s work together reclaiming life back from clutches unfortunate event most equipped passionate way.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Orland Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Orland Park

Areas of Practice in Orland Park

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Proficient in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Fire Wounds

Providing skilled legal services for patients of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Healthcare Incompetence

Ensuring professional legal support for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Obligation

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, providing expert legal guidance to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Fall and Tumble Incidents

Professional in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking recovery for their harm.

Birth Traumas

Delivering legal assistance for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Incidents

Collisions: Devoted to supporting patients of car accidents gain reasonable payout for hurts and damages.

Bike Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal services for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

18-Wheeler Accident

Ensuring adept legal representation for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for hurts.

Construction Incidents

Dedicated to advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Head Traumas

Dedicated to ensuring specialized legal services for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Damages

Proficient in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered damages from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Collisions

Dedicated to legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Unfair Passing

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and experienced legal services to ensure restitution.

Spine Impairment

Dedicated to representing individuals with backbone trauma, offering professional legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440