...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Ottawa

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one in Ottawa has been a victim of dog bite injuries, Carlson Bier is your most reliable legal recourse. Our wealth of experience spans years putting justice into the hands of victims afflicted by these unpredictable incidents. Carlson Bier concentrates on presenting seamless, comprehensive arguments to secure optimal compensation for clients’ losses due directly to dog bite incidents. We have built up an impressive portfolio proving our distinct expertise in handling cases related to ‘Dog Bite Injuries.’ At every stage, we focus on preparations and extensive research alongside sufficiently understanding the unique dynamics of each case – ensuring your best chance at reparation is never jeopardized. Opting for a generalized personal injury lawyer might not always deliver this level of specialized representation required here; hence considering Carlson Bier becomes essential if you seek strategic counsel rooted in familiarity with specific laws surrounding “Dog Bite Injuries” in Illinois. So decide upon expert aid- chose Carlson Bier’s competence as Dog Bite Injury lawyers today!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Ottawa Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a dynamic group of personal injury attorneys who specialize in dog bite injuries. Located in Illinois, we uniquely understand the traumatic experience individuals undergo following such incidents and our primary objective is to ensure that you receive fair compensation for your physical and emotional distress.

Dog bites often result in painful wounds and substantial mental suffering which can disrupt the entire course of one’s daily life. While many overlook dogs as harmless family pets, it’s crucial to remember that they are animals with instincts quite different from ours. The aftermath of a dog bite injury can be severe, leading to lasting psychological trauma and hefty medical bills. A unique understanding of Illinois state laws enables us at Carlson Bier to work meticulously toward obtaining rightful compensation for victims.

Under Illinois law, failure by a pet owner to restrain their dog resulting in an unprovoked attack holds them liable for any ensuing injuries. It becomes redundant whether the dog has previously exhibited violent tendencies or if such an incident hasn’t happened prior.

Here are few key points crucially necessary when considering legal action:

• Evidential proof: Photos or videos indicating the inflicted injuries could be significantly helpful during case building.

• Medical records: Thorough documentation that outlines professional medical treatment received subsequent to the incident adds an indispensable weightage to your claim.

• Witnesses’ statements: Attestations from individuals who witnessed the incident may substantially corroborate your account of events which otherwise could come down simply down to “your word against theirs.”

Deciding on pursuing legal action might seem daunting, especially while nursing potentially debilitating injuries both physically and mentally. Remember choosing adept legal representation is paramount since it determines how well your rights get upheld through this arduous process.

At Carlson Bier, we believe that proper education about these types of cases brings immense value not only after experiencing but also helping prevent future occurrences owing partly due locals’ eagerness for outdoor activities where chances of encountering unleashed dogs increase exponentially. We’re dedicated to enlightening the community with essential know-how pertinent to understanding dog bite cases running a blog offering expert advice along with forums for discussions and live chat capabilities.

Our team’s proficiency combined with years of experience in this particular niche of personal injury law allows us to skillfully build a robust case bolstered by solid evidence, often paying close attention to details possibly overlooked otherwise. We tirelessly strive toward exceeding every client’s expectations, thus maintaining our steadfast reputation as exemplary advocates for victims of dog bites throughout Illinois.

Handling numerous such cases ourselves at Carlson Bier, we understand how laws surrounding dog bite injuries can be intricate and navigable only by seasoned professionals. Our goal is not simply legal representation but immersive support through guidance during each step throughout the case. While recuperating from your traumatic ordeal, we work toward ensuring all your rights are protected under Illinois state laws and obtain optimal compensation based deserving of all losses occurred owing directly or indirectly due to incident like medical bills, wage loss due inability work post-incident etc.,

If you have fallen victim to a dog bite incident and feel unsure about course future holds remember that you don’t have navigate alone through unchartered territory plagued by confusing legal jargon further increasing anxiety levels. Click on the button below let us take over while tending wounds both visible otherwise also figuring out how much exactly worth terms actual numbers accordingly giving back control your life rightfully deserves reinforcing fact that justice isn’t just blind accessible too even layperson.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Ottawa Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Ottawa

Areas of Practice in Ottawa

Bike Incidents

Proficient in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or risky conditions.

Scald Damages

Giving skilled legal assistance for patients of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Hospital Malpractice

Offering specialist legal assistance for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Accountability

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, offering adept legal help to clients affected by defective items.

Geriatric Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Stumble Occurrences

Skilled in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking recovery for their harm.

Neonatal Damages

Delivering legal help for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Collisions: Devoted to aiding clients of car accidents gain fair settlement for harms and losses.

Motorbike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

18-Wheeler Crash

Ensuring adept legal services for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for damages.

Worksite Incidents

Focused on advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Cognitive Impairments

Expert in extending specialized legal assistance for patients suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Injuries

Adept at managing cases for people who have suffered damages from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Focused on legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Passing

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and professional legal services to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Impairment

Dedicated to supporting clients with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​