...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Park City

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When a frightening dog bite incident unfolds, every second counts. Navigating such traumatic events can be daunting—that’s where Carlson Bier comes to the fore as an unmatched ally in your fight for justice. As experts in the field of Dog Bite Injuries law, our team has dedicated their expertise and skills towards safeguarding victims’ rights within Illinois’ legal framework, ensuring you receive fair compensation for your injuries. Despite adapting entirely within the confines of Illinois law, we have represented clients from expansive locations including Park City and have cultivated a successful track record across these jurisdictions. Our relentless pursuit for excellence drives us to challenge negligence at all costs while guiding you through each step with compassion and understanding. Remember: it is not about inciting fear but ensuring responsibility – both legally and ethically where pet ownership is concerned. When grappling with complex laws surrounding dog bite injuries trust nothing less than Carlson Bier’s proven adeptness; because we believe that everyone deserves justice – regardless of their zip code.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Park City Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the trauma and loss that a dog bite injury can cause. Dog bites often result in serious physical harm, psychological stress and unexpected financial burdens due to exorbitant medical costs. More importantly, these incidents are often followed by complex legal proceedings that necessitate experienced and adept counsel.

Dog Bite Injuries do not merely extend to superficial flesh wounds but encompass severe injuries like punctures, lacerations, fractured bones or even complications such as infections or rabies. Dog bite law in Illinois embeds immense intricacies that require proficient interpretation for correct implementation.

• Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites.

• No proof of owner’s negligence is required; if their dog harms another individual, the owners are held liable.

• The liability rule extends beyond actual bites — it covers any type of injury caused by an owner’s pet.

Understanding these key aspects is vital while dealing with your personal injury case related to a dog bite incident. As your appointed representatives we strive continuously towards assuring you get the justice you deserve.

Negligence on part of the dog owner, leash laws violation or unvaccinated dogs can become potential indicators for establishing culpability in court cases concerning Dog Bite Injuries. Even circumstances surrounding Dogs ‘at large’ which harm individuals form part of our legal expertise at Carlson Bier.

Inevitably dealing with insurance companies also becomes an integral part of this journey post an accident. As trained negotiation representatives beside you:

• We negotiate persistently ensuring maximum reimbursement opportunity under coverage limits

• Our domain-specific lawyers utilize their proficiency in laws pertaining strictly to ‘dog control’ thus comprehensively knowledge backing each communication

• We identify any chances of low-balling strategies from insurers providing counter contentions fostering fair settlements

We realize acceptance regarding the fact that you might be burdened financially post such traumatizing events could be challenging along with coping mentally and physically through recovery phases. Here at Carlson Bier, we work on a contingency fee basis for your dog bite claims meaning you pay fees only when resolution is reached and compensation is granted.

Additionally, our collective wealth of experience ruling in favor of clients filing personal injury law claims post seriou dog bite injuries highlights our dedication towards securing justice for the victims:

• High Success rates in disputes filed under Illinois Dog Bite Statute

• Familiarity with arguments usually put forth by pet owners or insurers and consequently prior readiness with efficient legal rebuttals

• Access to detailed investigative methods/legal resources requisite to argue effectively

Lastly, it is essential to note that timeframes bearing significant relevance are present hurling limitations to when a claim could be pursued against an incident concerning dog bite. As veterans recognizing these crucial boundaries can often foreground the difference between success and failure during lawsuits.

At Carlson Bier, we pledge commitment towards guiding you through this daunting process steadfastly simplifying procedures steeped in legal complexities providing clarity while reinforcing confidence. Becoming cognizant about steps involved beyond merely nursing serious physical wounds back towards health becomes imperative post any tragic accident such as Dog Bite Induced Injury ones.

We urge you to click on the button below; unveiling exactly where your case stands against formal parameters structured within state’s frameworks. Fathom opportunities available seizing chances towards potentially deserving compensations. Even if confused or initially overwhelmed do not hesitate before reaching out seeking advice from us – Your Partners On The Road To Justice!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Park City Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Park City

Areas of Practice in Park City

Bike Accidents

Expert in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Burn Wounds

Providing expert legal assistance for individuals of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Clinical Negligence

Providing expert legal services for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Accountability

Taking on cases involving faulty products, providing specialist legal help to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Mistreatment

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble and Stumble Occurrences

Expert in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking redress for their injuries.

Newborn Traumas

Extending legal help for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Crashes: Concentrated on supporting sufferers of car accidents get equitable compensation for hurts and losses.

Scooter Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Big Rig Mishap

Providing expert legal assistance for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for injuries.

Construction Collisions

Focused on supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Cerebral Impairments

Expert in ensuring professional legal support for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Traumas

Specialized in tackling cases for people who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Specializing in legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Wrongful Passing

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and expert legal support to ensure redress.

Neural Impairment

Dedicated to assisting patients with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​