FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Park Forest

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has experienced a spinal cord injury in Park Forest, the professional expertise of Carlson Bier could be invaluable. A long-time champion for personal rights in Illinois, this firm specializes in helping clients navigate the complexities and stressors that come with such severe injuries. As leaders in personal injury law, they provide comprehensive legal services specifically tailored to spinal cord cases–from assessing medical records and consulting experts to ensuring ultimate compensation for your physical suffering and financial losses. Having top-notch advocacy on your side can make all the difference when it comes to getting justice. Their unwavering commitment coupled with their impressive track record demonstrates why when it comes to confronting devastating circumstances like spinal cord injuries, involving Carlson Bier is prime consideration. They engage each case keenly focusing not merely on winning but also restoring client’s life quality post-trauma—enabling them get back what was lost due to others’ negligence; demonstrating just how valuable good representation really is during these challenging times.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Park Forest Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our esteemed team of personal injury attorneys understands the life-altering implications of a Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). As an Illinois-based law firm, we have a significant knowledge base and vast experience in managing such challenging cases. Our number one focus is ensuring the rights and rightful compensations of spinal cord injury victims aren’t minimized or overlooked.

Spinal Cord Injuries can vary significantly, ranging from mild to severe forms. The repercussions could lead to partial or complete paralysis, affect mobility and sensory functions as well as disrupt normal bodily functions. This often results in the need for lifelong assistance or treatment, causing financial burdens on the victim and their families. But it’s important to know that if your spinal cord injury was caused due to someone else’s careless actions or negligence, you are entitled to seek compensation under Illinois State Law.

Here at Carlson Bier, we’d like you to understand some essential facets related to Spinal Cord Injuries:

• Classification: SCIs can be classified as ‘complete,’ leading to entire loss of function below the level of injury, or ‘incomplete,’ where some functionality is retained.

• Symptoms: These may include pain, numbness, paralysis or difficulty breathing which indicate vital damage necessitating immediate medical attention.

• Causes: Motor vehicle accidents account for more than half of all SCIs followed by falls, sports injuries and violent acts like gunshot wounds.

Proving fault in spinal cord injuries requires adept legal expertise coupled with thorough fact collection & analysis – something our experienced lawyers excel at. At Carlson Bier our methodical approach combines cutting-edge legal strategies with over-the-top negotiation expertise aimed at delivering favorable case outcomes for our clients.

We handle claims connecting SCIs resulted from diverse situations including vehicular accidents; slip/trip/falls; construction mishaps; medical malpractice; defective products/equipment but you don’t have to restrict yourself only within these bounds – any accident that led to an SCI due to others’ negligence can be contended for just compensation.

When you choose Carlson Bier, you stand equal before the law – we ensure your voice is heard, from initial claims and case preparations through till settlement negotiation or trial. We strive not only to secure monetary assistance but also the rehabilitation resources and moral support essential during your post-injury period. This goal underscores everything we do as a firm committed to championing personal injury victims’ welfare.

Remember, the key factor in winning a spinal cord injury lawsuit is demonstrating that another party was indeed at fault – negligent towards their duty of care leading to your injuries. Our lawyers will meticulously compile evidence; consult with reputed medical professionals; engage strategic tactics against insurance company pushes catering best legal advice both inside and outside courtrooms.

We understand that nothing can completely alleviate the pain of experiencing Spinal Cord Injuries. But seeking rightful remuneration catalyzes overall recovery process providing financial aid necessary for treatment costs & ongoing care or income loss alongside compensating non-economic damages like pain & suffering, emotional distress etc.

Time is precious following an SCI; every second counts both legally & medically. Just as immediate medical care minimizes adverse impacts so does prompt legal action increase chances of full claim availability under Illinois Statute of Limitation Laws on personal injury cases

With Carlson Bier by your side, you’ll never have to face any ordeal alone: our allies convert challenges into victories!

Ready to move forward? Want to find out how much your case could be worth? Click on the button below now! Let us guide you towards justice with proper advisory and representation tailored specifically for your unique circumstances.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Park Forest Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Park Forest

Areas of Practice in Park Forest

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Expert in legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Supplying specialist legal advice for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Physician Incompetence

Extending expert legal assistance for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Liability

Handling cases involving faulty products, providing adept legal assistance to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Tumble Injuries

Skilled in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking compensation for their damages.

Birth Traumas

Offering legal aid for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Collisions

Collisions: Dedicated to guiding clients of car accidents gain equitable remuneration for damages and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Specializing in providing representation for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Semi Collision

Extending expert legal advice for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just claims for hurts.

Building Site Incidents

Concentrated on defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Brain Injuries

Expert in ensuring expert legal representation for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Harms

Adept at addressing cases for victims who have suffered harms from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Collisions

Committed to legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Fatality

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and adept legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Committed to defending clients with paralysis, offering specialized legal support to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440