...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Paw Paw

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Dog bite injuries are incredibly distressing, yet quite common occurrences in Paw Paw. When faced with such an ordeal, the undivided attention of an experienced legal representative is crucial, and Carlson Bier attorneys masterfully provide this support. Specializing in personal injury cases, particularly those pertaining dog bite injuries, our lawyers understand not just the legal system but also the sensitive nature of these incidents. We carefully investigate each case’s specifics to advocate for victims assertively and thoughtfully fight for their rights. Our thorough research uncovers vital evidence regarding owner negligence or violation of leash laws which contributes significantly in securing maximum compensation possible. At Carlson Bier we prioritize client communication ensuring you’re regularly updated about your case progressions and any potential implications related to Illinois law alterations on dog bites incidences. Your relief from financial burdens associated with medical expenses resulting from a Dog Bite Injury is our paramount concern at Carlson Bier; trust us for committed representation throughout this challenging time.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Paw Paw Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we believe in fervently safeguarding your rights when you’ve been a victim of any form of personal injury. A foremost area of our expertise is representing victims who have sustained injuries from dog bites—an unfortunate incident that can lead to severe physical harm and emotional distress. Using knowledge gained over the years, our experienced team of attorneys guide victims through the complexities surrounding dog bite cases and strive to secure fair reimbursement for their suffering.

The legal landscape of dog bite injuries varies depending on state statutes, in Illinois, the law distinctly favors victims. Under Illinois’ Animal Control Act, if a dog attacks or attempts to attack an individual without provocation while they are conducting themselves peacefully in a place where they’re legally allowed to be, then the owner is liable for civil damages. This gives bite victims substantial opportunities to recoup compensation.

It’s important for potential clients like yourself to understand some crucial points regarding dog bite injury cases:

– Understanding Liability: In many cases, neithernegligence nor previous biting episodes needto be proven; focus primarily revolves around ownership and whether provocation occurred.

– Types of Damages: Typically, monetary recovery stems from varying elements such as medical expenses (current & future), lost wages due to inability to work during recovery period, damage property or clothing during attack could also qualify

– Statute Of Limitation: Generally under Illinois law governing personal injury claims, one has two years from date of incident to initiate lawsuit but there exist few exceptions

Proving liability essentially rests on documentation following theft incident – police reports ,medical records or photographs combined with witness testimonies offer strong foundationfor successful claim. While this may seem overwhelming amidst handling trauma aftermath having an experienced attorney by your side amplifies leverage considerably facilitating rightful compensation settlement.

Dealing with traumatic aftershocks along with managing legal intricacies can often take a toll on victims which is why at Carlson Bier you will find compassionate yet firm support. Our attorneys specialize in dog bite injury cases, relentlessly fighting on behalf their clients.

Excellent client-attorney communication is our hallmark; valued clients are always kept abreast with developments relating to their case. Furthermore, aware of the financial strain such incidents can bring about, we operate on a contingency fee basis which means you pay us only when we successfully win or settle your case. Hence, rest assured that by choosing Carlson Bier as your legal representation, you’re placing confidence in vigilant defenders who work tirelessly with one singular focus – obtaining justice for YOU.

Lastly, it’s important note success doesn’t just equate securing compensation but also prevention further incidents. Post-recovery process often includes ensuring guilty parties take necessary steps preventing recurrence and implementing more responsible pet ownership practices subsequently safeguarding not just yourself but entire community as well.

At this point the biggest question might be: What is my case worth? The intricacies surrounding a legal suit may seem daunting and evaluating its potential worth even more so. Here at Carlson Bier, we offer you ease throughout this ordeal via an interactive tool designed to provide insight towards understanding potential compensation value associated with your specific situation.

Click on the button below for a personalized evaluation of your case’s worth based on unique circumstances accompanied by expert advice from seasoned professionals fuelled by years of successful navigation around personal injury lawsuits.

We look forward to venturing this journey to justice together!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Paw Paw Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Paw Paw

Areas of Practice in Paw Paw

Bicycle Mishaps

Specializing in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Fire Traumas

Offering expert legal support for people of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Medical Incompetence

Providing experienced legal services for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Accountability

Addressing cases involving defective products, supplying skilled legal services to individuals affected by defective items.

Aged Abuse

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Trip and Slip Incidents

Skilled in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking recovery for their harm.

Birth Injuries

Offering legal assistance for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Crashes: Devoted to helping clients of car accidents gain just remuneration for wounds and losses.

Scooter Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal support for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Semi Accident

Offering specialist legal services for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for injuries.

Construction Collisions

Focused on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Cerebral Impairments

Specializing in delivering expert legal assistance for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Damages

Adept at dealing with cases for clients who have suffered wounds from dog bites or beast attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Expert in legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unjust Death

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and adept legal assistance to ensure redress.

Spine Trauma

Committed to advocating for individuals with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal services to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​