FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Paw Paw

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When the unforeseen occurs and you find yourself dealing with a spinal cord injury, selecting the right legal representation can be transformative. Carlson Bier is an Illinois based law firm specializing in personal injury cases. Our skilled team has extensive experience focusing on complex spinal cord injuries caused by various forms of negligence including vehicular accidents, work-related incidents or falls. Opting for Carlson Bier means entrusting your case to lawyers who are well-versed in both the medical perspective and legislation associated with these critical concerns. Understanding that each client’s situation is distinctive, we mold our approach to suit precise needs ensuring maximum possible compensation for your loss and suffering effectively pursued through all stages of litigation. Carlson Bier provides adept professional advice; aiming not just for justice but also contributing towards preventing such traumatic injuries from happening recurrently within our communities via robust advocacy programs. Seek out excellence when legal assistance becomes vital post-spinal cord injuries – consider turning to the expertise of Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Paw Paw Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that a spinal cord injury can be life-changing and devastating. Our highly skilled team of personal injury attorneys in Illinois is compassionate and dedicated to advocating for victims’ rights. Spinal cord injuries, being different from most other types of injuries, have unique aspects that require specialized knowledge.

A spinal cord injury refers to any damage inflicted upon the bundle of nerves running down the length of your spine. This bundle of nerves serves as the communication highway between your brain and body, allowing you to move, feel sensation, and maintain vital functions such as breathing. When this communication route is disrupted due to an injury, it can lead to partial or total paralysis below the level of the wound.

One key fact about these injuries is their unpredictable nature – they manifest differently in every individual based on factors like age, overall health status and extent/type of harm. Common causes include vehicular accidents, violent attacks (such as gunshot wounds), falls from great height or sports-related activities.

Spinal cord injuries can be classified into two broad categories:

• Complete: Involving total loss of function below the level of injury

• Incomplete: Where there’s still some degree of feeling or movement below the point of damage

It’s essential to remember that swift medical intervention post-injury contributes significantly towards minimizing further complications and aiding potential recovery efforts. Prompt treatment also plays a pivotal role in determining if you suffer long-term disability.

Post-injury rehabilitation personalized according to specific needs forms an inherent part during recuperation phase often involving physical therapy modalities focused on maintaining strength and motor skills while simultaneously preventing contractures (joint stiffness) or pressure sores.

Surviving a spinal cord injury leads not only to grave physical repercussions but severe psychological distress too; feelings akin to grief are common amidst trauma survivors given significant lifestyle modifications imposed abruptly by this predicament.

Given these complexities associated with spinal cord injuries(hence abbreviated as ‘SCI’), you deserve an attorney who recognizes these intricacies and fights relentlessly for your rightful claim. At Carlson Bier, our team boasts years of experience in SCI cases, always maintaining a client-first approach while navigating such claims.

The financial burden arising from hospital bills, rehabilitation costs, assistive devices/appliances or home modifications can only pile on the agony when dealing with substantial bodily changes unleashed by SCI. Our attorneys aim to alleviate this weight by helping recover compensation covering past and future medical expenses, lost wages or future earning potential, pain/suffering as well as loss of enjoyment in life.

Remember, every spinal cord injury case is unique; hence we invest time understanding your personal situation before crafting a strong case that increases likelihood of securing optimal results pertinent to Illinois law provisions. It’s our firm belief that adequate compensatory restitution enables victims the resources they require to focus on physical recovery instead of grappling unjustly with financial despair

At Carlson Bier, we place utmost value in empowering spinal cord injury victims through detailed knowledge about their rights under Illinois law ensuring best possible outcome legal representation can fetch. Ready for next steps? We invite you to click the button below and discover how much your case might be worth! Your journey towards justice begins here; allow us to make it less daunting so you may redirect efforts towards re-building functionality post-SCI without an added worry of seeking rightful claim representation during these challenging times.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Paw Paw Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Paw Paw

Areas of Practice in Paw Paw

Bicycle Collisions

Specializing in legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Scald Injuries

Giving specialist legal support for individuals of major burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Medical Malpractice

Delivering professional legal assistance for victims affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Liability

Managing cases involving faulty products, supplying adept legal services to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Elder Abuse

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Slip Occurrences

Professional in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking redress for their losses.

Childbirth Traumas

Supplying legal help for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Crashes: Committed to guiding sufferers of car accidents secure just compensation for damages and damages.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Big Rig Accident

Extending professional legal services for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for injuries.

Worksite Crashes

Concentrated on defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Brain Injuries

Expert in offering professional legal services for persons suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Injuries

Expertise in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Crashes

Committed to legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unjust Death

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and experienced legal guidance to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Injury

Expert in representing clients with paralysis, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​