...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Bicycle Accidents in Paxton

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

As a leader in personal injury law, Carlson Bier understands the complexities and challenges of bicycle accidents. With cycling being an essential part of many Paxton resident’s commutes or recreational activities, these unfortunate incidents can occur unexpectedly. The team at Carlson Bier is experienced in handling such unique cases, making them a top choice as representation for your bicycle accident claims. Their proven track record testifies to their skillful navigation through intricate situations and meticulous negotiation strategies that aim to secure fair settlements for victims. In profound understanding of Illinois traffic laws catered specifically towards bicyclists gives Carlson Bier an edge over others when advocating on behalf of clients who have suffered due to another party’s negligence while cycling on roadways in Paxton.. Having successfully represented numerous victims seeking justice from Bicycle Accidents., arguably stands unrivaled as they work zealously toward ensuring all claimants receive full restitution from liable parties without crossing any ethical lines set by the state law regulations.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Paxton Illinois

Nestled within the robust legal landscape of Illinois, Carlson Bier is a powerhouse law firm specializing in personal injury cases, with particular expertise in representing victims of bicycle accidents. Our seasoned attorneys bring years of experience, meticulous attention to detail and unwavering commitment to each case we undertake.

In the realm of bicycle accidents – an area sadly growing in prevalence- understanding your rights as are paramount. First and foremost, the sheer vulnerability cyclists face while sharing roads with larger motor vehicles sets a distinct backdrop for any potential litigation. In many scenarios where a collision occurs between a cyclist and another entity, even if partially at fault or involved in an unlit night-time accident; cyclists may still have valid claims for their injuries.

Bicycle accidents can be categorized generally into five types:

•Accidents involving automobiles

•Dooring incidents (whereby a car door is abruptly opened into your path)

•Dog-related accidents

•Defective equipment

•Cycling on poorly maintained infrastructure

These categories form unique subsets within personal injury law – each encased by its distinctive rules and complexities which require tailored strategic approaches.

Your entitlements following an accident may include compensation for medical expenses, lost wages due to incapacity to work following accident-related injuries, property damage such as loss or damage to your bike and pain/suffering endured post-accident. However, determining liability requires definite proof that negligence occurred resulting in injury.

The role of our team here at Carlson Bier doesn’t stop merely at establishing culpability but extends further into advising our clients about strategically positioning their claim under Illinois’s ‘Comparative Negligence’ rule. According to this rule – even if you were partially responsible for your accident – it doesn’t bar you from recovering damages; instead, it reduces the overall compensation proportionally by one’s degree of fault.

Navigating through these associated aspects necessitates sound legal advice premised on knowledge depth & extensive field experience, which Carlson Bier promises to offer unwaveringly. Keep in mind, filing deadlines or ‘statute of limitations’ is another legal nuance deserving rapt attention – typically two years from the accident date for most personal injury claims in Illinois.

Over time, our commitment at Carlson Bier remains constant: providing expert guidance while ensuring a comfortable understandability level even for those unfamiliar with legal jargon. We believe that knowledge empowers individuals to make informed decisions about their situations and rights.

We assure you that our team routinely goes above and beyond: fighting for justice for bicycle accident victims by vehemently challenging counterclaims, examining every piece of evidence, tapping into highly qualified experts when needed, and persistently negotiating until we secure what’s rightfully ours- Your full & fair compensation.

Every Bicycle Accident Victim deserves comprehensive protection against any exploitative tendencies or biases operating within an adversarial legal system. Herein lies our core mission at Carlson Bier – With us; Justice never rides alone!

Ultimately in this arduous journey towards justice post-bicycle accidents, choosing the right law firm can dramatically influence your claim’s outcome. As experienced personal injury attorneys ourselves nestled firmly within Illinois state’s legal landscape spectrum – we respect overoptimistic promises’ luring potential but choose to base our faith on something more tangible; Proven Results! We invite you to click on the button below and discover how our esteemed group can help calculate your case’s worth accurately based on individualized circumstances. No matter how far-reaching or small it may initially seem–We stand committed because with Carlson Bier – Every Case Matters!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Paxton Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Paxton

Areas of Practice in Paxton

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Expert in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Scald Traumas

Extending adept legal services for patients of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Medical Carelessness

Offering professional legal assistance for clients affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Liability

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, offering skilled legal support to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Elder Malpractice

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble & Fall Occurrences

Professional in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking restitution for their suffering.

Neonatal Damages

Offering legal support for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Accidents

Incidents: Focused on aiding clients of car accidents gain appropriate payout for wounds and damages.

Bike Crashes

Specializing in providing legal support for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Semi Mishap

Providing expert legal representation for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for injuries.

Worksite Accidents

Focused on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Neurological Impairments

Dedicated to offering expert legal services for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Harms

Specialized in handling cases for victims who have suffered damages from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Collisions

Specializing in legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Unjust Death

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and skilled legal representation to ensure fairness.

Spine Injury

Committed to advocating for persons with spine impairments, offering professional legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​