...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Payson

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating through the process of a dog bite injury case requires seasoned legal expertise. The personal injury attorneys at Carlson Bier demonstrate an unparalleled commitment to guiding victims in Payson, Illinois, zealously ensuring their rights are protected and that they receive due compensation for their injuries. Our team holds significant experience in handling such unique cases with finesse and dexterity borne from years of varied practice. We understand that each incident has its own complexities and necessitates individualized representation. You can be assured our skilled attorneys adapt strategies according to these variables aimed at achieving the most favorable outcomes possible for you as a victim of dog bite related incidents. Offering comprehensive services during this challenging period to help ease your financial burden incurred as a result of someone else’s pet negligence is just one aspect where we stand apart among law firms statewide which deal with Dog Bite Injuries lawsuits – Choose Carlson Bier, where justice meets expertise.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Payson Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand dog bite injuries are more than just traumatic experiences; they can constitute severe damage, lifelong scars, and mounting medical expenses. As experienced personal injury attorneys in Illinois, we specialize in assisting victims of dog bites pursue the compensation they rightly deserve.

Every year in Illinois, hundreds of innocent individuals endure painful injuries from dog bites due to the negligence or lack of control by pet owners. It’s a heartbreaking reality that as per current reports, children under ten years old represent the majority of such appalling attacks resulting in serious injuries.

Dog bite claims hinge on complex legal processes quite discouraging for most victims who are grappled with physical wounds and emotional trauma. Understanding this predicament is crucial at Carlson Bier and forms a key principle underlying our professional ethos.

• Adequate knowledge: We emphasize being legally informed on your rights post encountering a dog bite incident. The State law allows you to claim against an owner whose dog has bitten you unprovoked while legally present on their property or public place.

• Legal documentation: Following an attack, it’s imperative to collect all pertinent information about the incident including names, witnesses’ details if any, photographs etc., vital components for building your case strongly.

The Carlson Bier team differs from other personal injury lawyers through our two-fold approach. We focus first on rigorous fact-finding missions paired with legal analysis going beyond what meets the eye. Second is our empathetic approach realizing each client is more than just another case number; behind every file is a person seeking justice following an unfortunate situation they neither chose nor deserved howsoever.

Furthermore:

• Timely response: Time is often precious in personal injury lawsuits involving dog bites—the swifter action taken leads to better outcomes typically.

• Compensation sought: Our fight aims at complete remuneration covering not only immediate hospital bills but also impending psychological therapy costs necessary for complete recovery post-trauma.

Moreover, having navigated countless dog bite cases across Illinois, we boast a fair understanding of the complexity involved and approach each with an unswerving commitment to valuing our clients’ well-being.

Having said this, it is essential to stress Carlson Bier’s strict compliance with the State law. Precisely, having our primary office in Illinois only, not Payson or any other city—completely avoiding any illicit advertising while following transparency in all professional commitments.

In contrast to reluctant insurance companies usually offering inadequate settlements that don’t cover life after injuries adequately, your best advantage lies in seeking legal counsel immediately after a biting incident occurs. We at Carlson Bier handle these types of personal injury cases routinely; hence understand exactly how much exposure such incidents can lead to vis-à-vis cost-benefit analysis for medical treatments extending sometimes over years together.

Our services bring a sense of security back into lives disrupted by such traumatic instances through our substantial expertise within personal injury litigation across Illinois without exception – treating you as more than just another case file number but an individual deserving of justice post-trauma endured.

More so:

• Claim substantiation: We ensure valid claims have maximized opportunities at success ensuring victims aren’t doubly penalized—once by dogs and then by unyielding insurance adjusters.

Trust us. Recovering from a dog bite can be daunting on physical and emotional grounds—but you need not traverse this path alone anymore! Our experienced attorneys are handpicked specifically because we believe every person has a right to justice especially when innocence leads them into unfortunate circumstances completely unforeseen.

To sum up: If you recently were subjected to a dog bite attack causing severe injuries both physically and emotionally—we encourage you not only empathetically but also legally taking cognizance of your rights upheld aptly under the umbrella of the law rightfully designed safeguarding victims like yourself. Click on the button below now—providing us an opportunity to examine your case individually and determine its worth, possibly reopening avenues for a normal life again post such an incident.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Payson Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Payson

Areas of Practice in Payson

Cycling Collisions

Focused on legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Extending skilled legal services for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Medical Incompetence

Offering expert legal services for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Fault

Taking on cases involving defective products, offering adept legal guidance to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Neglect

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall and Trip Mishaps

Professional in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking recovery for their losses.

Birth Harms

Offering legal guidance for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Incidents: Devoted to helping patients of car accidents get reasonable remuneration for hurts and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on providing legal support for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Big Rig Collision

Delivering specialist legal assistance for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for injuries.

Building Site Collisions

Focused on supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Neurological Damages

Specializing in extending dedicated legal representation for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Damages

Proficient in handling cases for persons who have suffered harms from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Committed to legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Loss

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and adept legal services to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Damage

Dedicated to defending persons with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​