FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Pearl

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has endured the trauma of dog bite injuries in Pearl, Illinois, turning to an experienced legal advocate like Carlson Bier can make all the difference. Our dedicated team specializes in dog bite injury cases; we understand the intricacies surrounding this type of personal injury law and work tirelessly to secure fair compensation for our clients. At Carlson Bier, we believe that victims should not have to bear the burden of medical expenses or emotional distress caused by a negligent pet owner’s oversight. We are committed to fighting vigorously on your behalf against insurance companies and holding liable parties accountable for their actions. So why choose us? Because at Carlson Bier, we extend compassionate yet unyielding representation with proven track records favoring our clients’ interests over everything else. When dealing with dog bites injuries in Pearl, don’t leave anything up to chance—trust the professionals at Carlson Bier who inherently care about every case they dedicate themselves to handle.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Pearl Illinois

Understanding the implications of dog bite injuries is crucial, particularly for victims seeking compensation for their injuries. Here at Carlson Bier, a group of distinguished personal injury attorneys situated in Illinois, we are committed to providing comprehensive insights regarding this specific area of law.

When dealing with dog bite cases, it’s essential to recognize that the state operates under ‘strict liability’ rules. This means that an owner cannot excuse themselves from responsibility by claiming ignorance about their dog’s dangerous tendencies. Consequently, if you’ve been bitten by a dog in Illinois and suffered injuries as a result, you possibly have grounds to file an injury claim against the owner.

However, pursuing legal action can be quite complex without proper guidance or representation. At Carlson Bier, our team possesses ample experience and expertise in handling delicate matters such as these judiciously. We maintain transparency throughout our process so that every client feels duly informed.

As emphasized above, understanding your rights and obligations as a victim is fundamental when it comes to navigating through personal injury issues concerning dog bites:

• Always seek medical attention first: Immediate care not only helps mitigate health risks but also aids in recording necessary details useful later during evaluation.

• Report the incident: Make sure to let local authorities know about what happened for official documentation purposes.

• Compile evidence: Photographs of your wounds or witness statements could potentially strengthen your case further.

• Reach out to us promptly: The sooner we’re aware of the case specifics, the more effectively we can assist you.

Contending with traumatic experiences like a severe dog bite may often leave victims bewildered and uncertain about their next course of action. In situations like these where lives get disrupted unexpectedly due to others’ negligence or inability to control dogs adequately, seeking compensation becomes vitally important.

At Carlson Bier, we exhaustively examine all aspects pertaining to each case prior finalizing on an optimal strategy. We understand how both physical pain enduring psychological discomfort related post-dog bite trauma could have lasting impacts. Hence, our committed attorneys fervently advocate for obtaining maximum restitution on your behalf.

While every case is different and compensation might vary depending on multiple variables like extent of the injury, medical costs, loss of wages, etc., rest assured that we strive relentlessly to attain justice in all scenarios. Our comprehensive outlook ensures legal advice tailored to every specific circumstance while prioritizing efficient resolution and client satisfaction employing ethical practices throughout.

In terms of understanding how much your case might be worth, many individuals find this aspect quite intimidating or complicated. But don’t worry! To assist you through such challenges surrounding dog bite incidents & consequent personal injuries with ease and confidence, Carlson Bier has devised a convenient method just a click away!

We encourage you to proceed towards the button below- it’s specifically designed to help assess your case value promptly. Allow us at Carlson Bier to shoulder these stressful aspects confidently so that the focus can remain where it should be – getting better after suffering from a dreadful dog bite incident. Go ahead and take the first steps to having your questions answered & stress alleviated by clicking below now!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Pearl Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Pearl

Areas of Practice in Pearl

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Dedicated to legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Extending professional legal support for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Healthcare Malpractice

Delivering expert legal representation for patients affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Liability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, offering expert legal help to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Trip & Slip Occurrences

Expert in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking redress for their damages.

Neonatal Injuries

Providing legal assistance for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Incidents

Incidents: Devoted to guiding patients of car accidents gain equitable remuneration for hurts and losses.

Motorcycle Accidents

Committed to providing legal assistance for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Truck Mishap

Ensuring specialist legal representation for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for hurts.

Building Crashes

Concentrated on assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Neurological Harms

Focused on providing dedicated legal support for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Traumas

Proficient in handling cases for people who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Focused on legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Unjust Loss

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and expert legal support to ensure restitution.

Neural Injury

Focused on supporting persons with paralysis, offering expert legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440