FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Peotone

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the delicate realm of medical malpractice, Carlson Bier stands as the go-to law firm with a stellar reputation. We understand that in Peotone, seeking redress for any harm caused by healthcare professionals can prove daunting. This is where our seasoned attorneys offer you unparalleled support and expert legal representation. At Carlson Bier, we leverage our deep understanding of Illinois state laws to navigate your case successfully through every phase of litigation or settlement negotiation process – from assessing your claim’s merit to advocating tirelessly on your behalf before a jury if necessary. Our lawyers’ commitment centers on securing maximum compensation for victims while holding negligent parties accountable for their actions – after all, safeguarding patient rights is paramount to us.

At Carlson Bier, we solidify this dedication by providing keen attention to detail and personalized service each step along the way because in matters such as these– trust holds supreme value.

With strength rooted in skillful deliberation and reinforced by neigh-impeccable success rates; choosing Carlson Bier cascades into an emblematic embodiment of top-notch representation when dealing with medical malpractice cases in Peotone and beyond.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Peotone Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law with a focus on medical malpractice cases. Based in Illinois, our legal team proudly adheres to a robust mission—to advocate for the rights of each client and provide them with exceptional legal service that mitigates their struggles during challenging times.

Medical malpractice refers to situations involving negligence by healthcare professionals, causing injury or harm to patients. It primarily surfaces when doctors, dentists, nurses, therapists or other medical personnel fail to uphold the high standards of their profession while treating an individual. Irrespective of whether it’s as minute as incorrect medication dosage or as significant as surgical errors—the detrimental consequences could be immense and long-term for the patient involved.

To pursue a suit in Medical Malpractice under Illinois law there are key elements like;

• A breach of Standard Care: This refers to an evident failure by the medical professional(s) concerned to adhere to certain guidelines and standards expected in the respective field.

• An Injury Occurred: You must demonstrate that you suffered an injury following the said violation.

• Substantial Harm due to Negligence: There needs to be substantial proof linking your injuries directly back to this act of negligence.

For full appreciation and comprehension of these nuanced processes involved in filing a lawsuit against negligent medical practitioners—it calls for concerted efforts with versatile lawyers well versed in pertinent laws. At Carlson Bier, we take full responsibility with seamless dedication towards securing justice and fair compensation for our clients.

Our skilled attorneys at Carlson Bier carry years of experience handling numerous complex malpractice lawsuits. They apply strategic approaches personalized per case-specific dynamics—aiming at maximum damage recovery possible under Illinois malpractice laws. While no amount can truly compensate pain and suffering experienced due circumstances around such instances—holding responsible parties accountable goes a long way towards closure while offsetting financial burdens faced due unavoidable ensuing costs like hospital bills or loss income gaps.

Remember! Medical Malpractice is dense legal territory requiring adept understanding and expertise to navigate effectively. It is equally pivotal for the plaintiff to partner with a law firm appreciative of their specific circumstances while empathic to the emotional turmoil often accompanying such cases.

Rest assured! The Carlson Bier team guarantees not just astute professional representation, but also relentless pursuit towards justice and fair compensation potentially transformative for your subsequent life experience after an unfortunate occurrence involving medical malpractice.

Do you believe you or a loved one fell victim under such circumstances? Or perhaps, grappling with pursuing filing a related lawsuit unaided? It’d be prudent seeking informed advice before making any decision—medical malpractice matters entail high stakes alongside complex processes necessary for appropriate resolution.

Our commitment remains unwavering especially regarding disputes as substantive as Medical Malpractice within Illinois—we translate our mission into action by being there at every step as your ally in your quest for accountability and fair compensation out of these unfortunate events.

Feel free to explore further how we could assist make the disruptive aftermath less daunting—the committed Carlson Bier fraternity awaits patiently to aligning extensive legal prowess with proficient judicial insights towards navigating every direction around this journey laden with complexities. Understandably—discerning “How much your case could worth” may be overwhelming MP midst all prevalent uncertainty—so why not click on the button below and start making sense out today’s challenges through expert assistance? At Carlson Bier, each client is a priority deserving personal attention denoted adequately within the tireless fight against injustice!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Peotone Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Peotone

Areas of Practice in Peotone

Cycling Crashes

Proficient in legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Burn Wounds

Extending professional legal services for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Physician Malpractice

Delivering specialist legal assistance for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Obligation

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, offering adept legal guidance to individuals affected by defective items.

Elder Abuse

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Stumble Accidents

Specialist in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking recovery for their injuries.

Neonatal Traumas

Providing legal assistance for households affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Collisions

Incidents: Dedicated to assisting individuals of car accidents get appropriate settlement for damages and damages.

Scooter Collisions

Focused on providing legal assistance for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Big Rig Incident

Offering adept legal representation for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for losses.

Building Site Collisions

Dedicated to advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Cerebral Harms

Specializing in extending specialized legal advice for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Harms

Adept at tackling cases for people who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Jogger Collisions

Specializing in legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Unfair Loss

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and professional legal support to ensure justice.

Backbone Damage

Committed to assisting victims with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​