FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Bicycle Accidents in Pesotum

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you reside in Pesotum and have been a victim of a bicycle accident, Carlson Bier can assist you. Bicycle accidents often result in severe injuries that require comprehensive legal knowledge to manage effectively. That’s where the expertise of our personal injury lawyers at Carlson Bier comes into play. With an impressive track record for representing victims involved in these cases, we are sensitive to your needs and fight diligently for your rights, regardless of the complexity or severity of the accident. Our team is committed to ensuring that every client receives fair compensation for their physical suffering and financial setback caused by such unfortunate incidents. Hiring us means choosing years-long experience with proven outcomes coupled with tailor-made strategies designed uniquely per case scenario basis – making us among leading considerations when it comes to bicycle accidents attorney selection here at Illinois state level.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Pesotum Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on being one of the leading personal injury attorney groups in Illinois. As attorneys specializing in personal injury law, we deeply understand the trauma and disruption accidents can cause to an individual’s life. Our focus today will be on a particular type of accident – bicycle accidents.

Bicycle accidents occur far too often and their consequences can be severe if not fatal. The apparent freedom that comes with riding a bike also carries inherent risks, especially when sharing the road with motor vehicle drivers. Oftentimes, bicyclists suffer serious injuries due to negligent or reckless actions of motorists. When such unfortunate incidents occur, victims are entitled to seek compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, lost wages among other losses they may have incurred.

Based on our extensive experience representing clients in bicycle accident cases, it is important that individuals know how to protect their rights following an accident:

• If able: gather crucial evidence at the scene such as photos of your injuries and damage to your bicycle.

• Seek immediate medical attention regardless if you feel okay.

• Obtain the contact information of witnesses who may support your account of events.

• Notify your insurance company about the accident.

Moreover, it is also vital to note that these cases involve complex rules regarding liability and damages. For instance, Illinois observes comparative fault laws which provide that a cyclist’s recovery may be reduced by his/her own percentage of fault in causing the accident.

Another key point concerns statutes of limitations which restricts the timeframe within which an injured party can file a lawsuit. Typically in Illinois, it is two years from the date of occurrence but exceptions do exist depending upon circumstantial complexities.

While pursuing this legal path may seem daunting while recovering from an accident, enlisting professional help can make all the difference. At Carlson Bier dedicated team will work diligently on gathering evidence such as eyewitness accounts or expert testimonies; negotiating reasonable settlement offers; filing necessary paperwork within required timelines; and if needed taking your case to trial.

Ultimately, the value of any personal injury case will depend on a variety of factors including severity and permanency of injuries; mental anguish suffered; impact on earning capacity or loss of employment among more practical aspects such as total medical bill incurred, cost of future treatment needs or property damage.

At Carlson Bier, we understand that handling all these components while managing pain and emotional distress can be wearisome for most people. Hence, our aim is not just helping you fight for fair compensation but also providing guidance, support and legal education throughout this process.

In addition to offering personalized attention to each case, we at Carlson Bier believe in transparent dealings which includes clear communication about our fee structure. We often work with clients on a contingency basis where they pay nothing unless their case concludes successfully either through settlement or court judgment.

Another factor setting us apart from other firms is that we prioritize client’s specific desires whether it’s quickly settling cases out-of-court or aggressively litigating them before a jury – actions that always align with what appears best in terms of achieving maximum compensation for damages suffered by clients.

To conclude: bicycle accidents are complex events with far-reaching implications. If you have been injured in one such incident across Illinois (barring Pesotum), seeking competent legal representation can turn odds favorably towards acquiring full compensation against losses experienced due to someone else’s negligence.

So why wait? Don’t let time further restrict your legal options! Contact Carlson Bier today take control over this complicated situation – ascertain actual worth of your claim by clicking the button below!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Pesotum Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Pesotum

Areas of Practice in Pesotum

Bike Collisions

Dedicated to legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Burn Wounds

Extending specialist legal support for people of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Medical Malpractice

Providing expert legal advice for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Accountability

Taking on cases involving problematic products, providing professional legal help to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Mistreatment

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Fall Accidents

Expert in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking restitution for their injuries.

Newborn Wounds

Extending legal assistance for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Accidents

Accidents: Dedicated to guiding sufferers of car accidents gain fair settlement for hurts and harm.

Motorbike Incidents

Focused on providing legal assistance for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Truck Crash

Providing experienced legal support for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for injuries.

Construction Crashes

Committed to supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Harms

Focused on extending dedicated legal support for persons suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Traumas

Skilled in tackling cases for people who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Crashes

Focused on legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Unfair Loss

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and expert legal representation to ensure justice.

Neural Injury

Dedicated to representing persons with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440