FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Pesotum

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a dog bite injury in Pesotum is traumatic and daunting. Don’t navigate this confusing legal terrain on your own. Instead, allow Carlson Bier, renowned for their expertise in personal injury law involving dog bites, to represent you. Our dedicated attorneys exhaustively investigate every case detail to establish favorable outcomes for victims like you who are stricken with unexpected injuries requiring medical treatment or potential cosmetic surgery essential after these unfortunate incidents.

As specialists in handling dog bite injuries around Illinois, we commit ourselves to uphold justice by investigating negligent pet owners and seeking fair compensation meant specifically for covering your expensive medical bills associated with the accident’s impact on daily life activities.

Standing apart with our vast experience and aggressive representation tactics employed against insurance companies refusing adequate recovery claims, we ensure maximum possible reimbursement for Pesotum residents dealing with such distressing circumstance.

Let our reputable firm execute impeccable representation ensuring equitable resolution; contact us at Carlson Bier immediately irrespective of the breed involved causing damage—invariable of them being categorised as typically harmless or dangerous— entrust yourself upon only the most competent individuals proficiently skilled in Illinois’ intricate Dog Bite Injury Laws – Your wellbeing is our utmost priority: That’s a simple fact that has been proven time again!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Pesotum Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law with a primary focus on helping victims of dog bite incidents secure their rightful compensation. Located in the heart of Illinois, our expert attorneys have an established track record for securing settlements and verdicts across various severity levels, from minor injuries to life-threatening attacks.

Dogs are often termed ‘man’s best friend’, but unpleasant encounters with these pets can lead to dire impacts. Dog bites can result in severe physical trauma ranging from puncture wounds to nerve damages. They may likewise prompt psychological problems like fear or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

● Puncture Wounds: The sharp canine teeth easily penetrate the skin causing substantial damage which leads to infections if not treated properly.

● Nerve Damage: Intense bites could injure nerves leading to loss of sensation or impaired motor functions permanently affecting your quality of life.

● Emotional Trauma: Besides physical ailments, victims commonly suffer emotional distress after being bitten by a dog.

Understanding Illinois’ legal framework aids in navigating the process more effectively when seeking compensation for dog-bite related injuries. Under Illinois law, owners are typically held liable for injuries caused by their dogs barring some exceptions such as trespassing or provoking the animal intentionally.

So what makes up a strong dog bite case?

1- Evidence is crucial – Document any visible signs of harm including cuts, bruises, scratched clothing and keep all medical records indicating treatment needed due to the incident.

2- Eyewitnesses – Anyone who witnessed the incident provides additional credibility to your claim.

3- Expert testimony – Bringing in experts can help prove elements that aren’t visually apparent e.g., proving psychological damage or chronic pain ensuing from the attack.

Our firm takes pride in providing personalized guidance through each step ensuring every detail is thoroughly addressed – starting from gathering evidence and eyewitness testimonies down to negotiations with insurance adjusters. Our attorneys at Carlson Bier approach these cases with the utmost determination and diligence while maintaining full transparency, so you’re never in the dark about your case’s progress.

We understand that dealing with personal injury litigation can seem daunting besides the existing distress caused by the incident. That’s why we strive to ease this burden off your shoulders making the process simple and untroubling for our clients. We carry out a comprehensive analysis of all available evidence along with a meticulous approach towards dealing with insurers putting us in an excellent position to fight for your rights assertively yet tactfully.

Based on our experience, dog bite incidents demand special attention due to their complexity. Each case differs from others — varying based on factors such as breed of dog involved, circumstances surrounding attack and severity of injuries inflicted. Hence we tailor strategies unique to every client tailoring them according to individual needs ensuring they receive rightful compensation.

Through years of fighting for justice for dog bite victims, a vital realization we’ve had is that timely action is key. The sooner you seek legal counsel after an incidence, higher are the chances of successfully securing fair compensation because relevant evidences can be preserved better and necessary legal steps expediently taken.

Whether you’re a victim seeking representation or someone wanting help navigating these complex cases – you’ve come to the right place. At Carlson Bier, we work persistently towards achieving desired outcomes for each client respecting their earnest trust bestowed upon us.

We invite you to click on the button below, providing us little more details about your unfortunate encounter leading us one step closer to uncovering what your case may be worth – taking another stride towards attaining justice! Remember – no pain should be left unanswered especially when it’s inflicted unfairly. Get started today and let’s together affirm – Justice prevails!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Pesotum Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Pesotum

Areas of Practice in Pesotum

Bicycle Incidents

Proficient in legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Supplying adept legal support for people of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Clinical Negligence

Offering expert legal support for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Liability

Handling cases involving faulty products, extending adept legal guidance to clients affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Slip & Slip Incidents

Expert in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking recovery for their harm.

Birth Harms

Supplying legal support for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Collisions: Concentrated on supporting victims of car accidents secure fair payout for injuries and losses.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Specializing in providing legal services for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Semi Collision

Delivering specialist legal support for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for harms.

Construction Site Crashes

Focused on representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Neurological Traumas

Specializing in ensuring professional legal assistance for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Injuries

Expertise in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered damages from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Incidents

Expert in legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Loss

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and expert legal support to ensure justice.

Vertebral Damage

Expert in defending individuals with paralysis, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440