Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Pesotum

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re involved in a pedestrian accident, you want the best representation possible. You need an experienced team who understands what’s at stake and how to navigate the complex legal landscape. That’s where Carlson Bier comes into play. As personal injury lawyers with a focus on pedestrian accidents, our law firm is committed to ensuring victims receive maximum compensation for their injuries and losses. With extensive litigation experience in cases involving pedestrian incidents, we can adeptly handle all aspects of your claim while providing strategic guidance every step of the way. We understand the regulations specific to Pesotum regarding such situations and within Illinois in general implicitly. Regardless of how challenging your case may seem, trust that Carlson Bier prioritizes your interests above anything else; aiming for optimal outcomes always falls under our purview. The selection process might be overwhelming but stating facts underscores why choosing us isn’t just another option but an ideal resolution catering specifically to Pedestrian Accident faqs.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Pesotum Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in various legal services with a distinct emphasis on personal injury law. A crucial aspect of our practice pertains to advocates for victims suffering from injuries sustained as pedestrians due to accidents. Given the unpredictability and severity often accompanying pedestrian accidents, it is vital for affected individuals and their loved ones to comprehend the potential legal strategies, rights, outcomes, and compensation available.

In Illinois encompasses diverse laws protecting the welfare of pedestrians. At Carlson Bier firm, we believe that every incident has its unique aspects which mandate meticulous evaluation before proceeding further in seeking rightful litigation or claiming due damages. We take into account scenarios where drivers do not yield right-of-way at crosswalks causing serious injuries or fatalities, distracted driving such as texting, talking or illicit activities like driving under influence (DUI) leading to pedestrian accidents etc.

• Rightful Compensation: If you are an injured pedestrian in an accident caused by another party’s negligence, you may receive compensatory awards covering your past and future medical expenses associated with the accident.

• Causal factors considered: These can range between reckless driver conduct including speeding-induced mishaps, failure in obeying traffic signs/rules/lights etc., harsh weather boundary conditions facilitating unfavorable roads circumstances among other things.

• Possibilities Available: From filing suits against negligent entities/drivers responsible for catastrophic pedestrian wounds/subsequent death to insurance claim proceedings – a concrete array of expert legal representation/grids can be tailored by us based on case specifics.

The Carlson Bier personal injury attorneys possess profound insights about procedural intricacies pertinent to Illinois state/local jurisdiction standards alongside all-encompassing federal guidelines thus offering formidable advocacy safeguarding your interests relentlessly. We understand each situation requires personalized attention while maintaining absolute discretion about client details empathetically therefore offering flexible appointments/consultations 24×7 inclusive weekends/holidays catering to your accessibility conveniences.

Pedestrian Law adherence concerning safety protocols vis-a-vis driver obligations are stringently laid out in Illinois law structure. Concurrently, the comprehensive legal counsel provided will facilitate an exhaustive understanding of your applicable rights as a victim plus diverse options available to you within the precincts of pertinent Illinois law and beyond.

Personal injury situations could be overwhelming due to associated discomfort, emotional taxing, financial burdens etc which is why initiated immediate contact with professional personal injury attorneys like us becomes absolutely pivotal for timely assessment on possible lawsuit filing or insurance claims – both involving intricate complex processes requiring expert offerings only competent attorneys can deliver.

When potential clients reach out to our firm about pedestrian accidents representation – they are linked instantly with one of our seasoned lawyers who not only have accumulated rich experiences handling such claim types but are also persistent negotiators and skilled litigators adept at securing rightful justice against all odds. Remember we function purely on contingency fee basis implying no upfront charges; our fees start clocking upon successful case settlement/resolution ensuring zero risks for clients approaching us seeking appropriate legal redressal.

Accidents happen. Sometimes those split-second events take away something precious from us affecting lives permanently. Thankfully robust litigation avenues exist especially if recipient victims consider contacting professional experts like our firm – Carlson Bier promptly guaranteeing you ample information influx besides thorough guidance steering toward obtaining optimum compensation catering remedial normalization.

Now that you’re armed with some essential information regarding pedestrian accidents laws and outcomes, wouldn’t it help knowing more precise specifics related strictly to your unique context? Let’s help you try evaluating how much your case might potentially worth aiding you make informed decision ultimately! So go ahead please do click the button below right now facilitating acceleration in bridging justice gaps; because remember every delay might push favorable outcomes further apart hence act today! Remember, time is of essence in such circumstances so initiate inquiries without hesitation thereby enabling maximum advantage capitalization based on timely inputs made.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Pesotum Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Pesotum

Areas of Practice in Pesotum

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Dedicated to legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or risky conditions.

Fire Burns

Extending adept legal advice for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Physician Carelessness

Ensuring experienced legal advice for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Obligation

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, offering professional legal assistance to clients affected by defective items.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble and Tumble Accidents

Expert in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking redress for their injuries.

Newborn Injuries

Offering legal support for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Crashes: Devoted to guiding clients of car accidents get appropriate recompense for injuries and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Focused on providing legal advice for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

18-Wheeler Collision

Ensuring expert legal support for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for harms.

Worksite Accidents

Focused on advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Head Injuries

Focused on delivering compassionate legal assistance for victims suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Skilled in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Jogger Mishaps

Dedicated to legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Loss

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and professional legal services to ensure restitution.

Neural Harm

Specializing in representing individuals with paralysis, offering professional legal assistance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer