...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Petersburg

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the repercussions of a Dog Bite Injury in Petersburg, it’s important to trust your case to an experienced legal team. Turn to Carlson Bier, a renowned personal injury lawyer firm that has shown incomparable professionalism and dedication in dealing with such cases throughout Illinois. As proficient negotiators who understand the complex nuances of dog bite laws across jurisdictions, they will strive tirelessly and firmly for your rights. At Carlson Bier, they believe no one should bear unnecessary hardship due to another party’s negligence or irresponsibility. They prioritize their clients’ needs first by advocating for maximum compensation under peculiar circumstances unique to each incident of Dog Bite Injuries. Their reputation is built on numerous successful settlements which have helped their clients restore some semblance of balance post-trauma. Their extensive knowledge ensures you’re not undercut nor blindsided by insurance companies’ tactics that attempt minimizing payouts at victims’ expense. Choose Carlson Bier as your go-to law group for unparalleled commitment and unwavering support through every step towards obtaining justice.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Petersburg Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your committed team of personal injury attorneys based out of Illinois and specializing in Dog Bite Injuries. With the experience and expertise garnered through practicing law in intricate injury cases, we provide service grounded on compassion toward our clients and an aggressive stand against parties responsible for their suffering.

Navigating the complexities of dog bite injuries can often be a stressful endeavor. We’re here however, to guide you expertly through this multifaceted legal process. Holding steadfast to our mission, we aim to not only help you understand these intricacies but also to arm you with knowledge essential for the maneuvering such situations successfully.

Dog bites can cause significant harm ranging from physical injury to emotional trauma – both requiring substantial resources for recovery. It is important therefore, that victims and their families are aware of rights accorded them by Illinois State Laws:

• Right to Compensation: If you are injured due to a dog bite or similar pet infliction caused by another person’s animal, you have a right under Illinois law (510 ILCS 5/16) to seek compensation for any costs associated with recovering from those injuries.

• Strict Liability Law: Unlike some states which follow the ‘one-bite rule’, implying that owners might be exempt from liability if there was no previous indicator about their pet’s violent tendencies, Illinois operates on strict liability laws where the owner is held accountable regardless.

• Filing within Statute Limitations: The statute limitations after an incident involving a dog attack gives two years period within which the victim must instigate relevant legal proceedings. Delay beyond this window could forfeit one’s ability to pursue justice legally.

At Carlson Bier, we adeptly employ these clauses amongst others in securing justice ensuring full restitution for our clients’ losses and pains – physically, psychologically or financially.

Beyond general bodily traumas such as lacerations or fractures attributable largely towards bites from larger breeds; smaller dogs too may inflict comparable harm. From puncture wounds posing infection risks to detrimental nerve damages latent in their repercussions, each dog bite case could indeed be unique. Reflecting this, our tailored approach helps individualize your experience with us, optimizing for a greater outcome.

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is another plausible effect we advocate vigilantly against. The emotional distress stipulating substantial therapy time and associated costs are factors often unrecognized by victims when filing claims solo. Through rigorous application of the law however bolstered by personalized psychological evaluations, we encompass the entirety of the ordeal inflicted upon you.

Returning to normalcy after such a harrowing experience might appear insurmountable but it need not be so with Carlson Bier as your committed partner through this restoration journey. Your guaranteed right for financial compensation combined with professional medical assistance would set you on that path swiftly and surely.

Here at Carlson Bier, regardless of which city within Illinois State you reside; we’re readily accessible to offer our guidance through these tumultuous times whether or not ‘Petersburg’ features in your address! Even though our physical offices might not be located there, rest assured that every resident throughout Illinois may count on us for unparalleled support during their trials ensuing dog bite injuries.

We understand that justice delayed is indeed justice denied – a principle grounding our work ethic intimately onto prompt action upon engagement. If you or anyone you know has been a victim of such an unfortunate incident, don’t delay seeking help any further!

Take action now! Explore further how much your case could potentially yield by clicking the button below for immediate assessment free-of-charge from experienced architects behind past windfall victories.

Don’t let undue fear about mounting bills or uncertainty stop you from exercising legitimate rights accorded under Illinois Laws – take that step towards peace today with esteemed counsel at hand ready to level those somewhat tilted scales back into balance – Carlson Bier awaits diligently behind doors opened 24/7 waiting to serve you.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Petersburg Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Petersburg

Areas of Practice in Petersburg

Bike Mishaps

Focused on legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Giving specialist legal help for patients of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Healthcare Malpractice

Extending dedicated legal support for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Liability

Addressing cases involving problematic products, delivering specialist legal guidance to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Trip and Trip Incidents

Professional in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking recovery for their harm.

Infant Injuries

Delivering legal aid for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Crashes

Mishaps: Concentrated on supporting patients of car accidents get equitable recompense for damages and impairment.

Motorbike Incidents

Specializing in providing legal assistance for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Trucking Collision

Offering expert legal representation for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for losses.

Building Crashes

Committed to advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Brain Injuries

Committed to ensuring expert legal assistance for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Injuries

Skilled in managing cases for persons who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Dedicated to legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Unfair Death

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and experienced legal services to ensure justice.

Backbone Harm

Committed to supporting victims with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal representation to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​