FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Burn Injuries in Philo

Burn Injuries Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating through the aftermath of a burn injury can be an overwhelming process. The repercussions both physically and emotionally are significant, demanding proactive legal representation to ensure full compensation for your ordeal. This is where Carlson Bier stands out as a benchmark in providing unrivaled expertise on burn injuries cases within Philo’s jurisdiction. Our team of dedicated professionals understands the intricate pathways that these claims can take and leverages decades of experience towards getting you just reparations. With our law firm, compassion meets skill in equal measure – formulating meticulous strategies tailored uniquely to each case we handle; because at Carlson Bier, every client matters deeply to us. When engaging with stakeholders – insurers or jury members alike – we commit ourselves wholeheartedly to present convincing arguments espousing your best interests. Rest assured knowing that with Carlson Bier handling your lawsuit, you’re backed by relentless advocates whom won’t rest until justice is served in its fullest glory for all burn injury victims across Philo! Trust Carlson Bier: commitment personified.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Burn Injuries Lawyers in Philo Illinois

At the Carlson Bier law firm, our esteemed personal injury attorneys undertake great diligence in safeguarding the rights of those having sustained burn injuries in Illinois. Such type of damage can result from various incidents like workplace accidents, faulty products, vehicular collisions and more. With a solicitation that ensures thorough case development, diligent negotiations with insurance firms and vigorous representation in court – we stand by our principle to prioritize your best interests.

Burn injuries have colossal impacts on victims as they bear distressful pain and suffering, expensive medical treatment costs, lost wages due to absence from work and other potential drawbacks such as disfigurement or permanent disability. The severity of a burn injury varies based on three distinct degrees which signify how deeply your skin has been affected:

• First-degree burns are least severe inflicting harm only to the outermost skin layer.

• Second-degree burns damage both the outer layer and underlying dermis causing blisters and considerably more pain.

• Third-degree burns go deepest into your body affecting both layers of skin, fat, muscles even bones while likely resulting in significant scarring.

Knowledge about these variations enables physicians to better diagnose the extent of injury aiding them towards prescribing an appropriate mode of treatment.

The liabilities about burn injuries get traced back typically to negligent behavior. Identifying responsible parties involves examining factors including adherence to safety protocols, proper warnings regarding possible dangers or defects in product design increasing risks for burn accidents — thus demanding comprehensive familiarity with specific laws relevant under each circumstance.

Carlson Bier possesses this level offering proficient counsel allowing us solid grounds to argue defending you against hegemony by insurance companies trying downplay their payout duties. You may be entitled under Illinois law to receive compensation covering economic damages correlated with medical expenses or income loss plus non-economic ones attributed upon mental anguish, physical discomfort or life quality diminution—and all these rest-secured when you appoint us representing your case against any party that had wrongfully caused you enduring burn injuries.

It’s essential to act promptly following a burn injury incident especially given Illinois’ statute of limitations provisioning a limited timeframe for filing your claim. Further, the investigative details get harder to source as time progresses – hence it’s always advantageous moving quickly while with intent safeguarding yourself legally in such circumstance.

Carlson Bier epitomizes talent and perseverance affording you the best possible legal representation should you fall prey to grave burn injuries. We have nurtured our practice on unmatched dedication towards client needs insisting that we continuously strive obtaining justice rightfully so deserving by you.

We fully appreciate getting entangled inadvertently into situations causing burn injuries can be daunting, your life might seem turned upside down during such sensitive times – here Carlson Bier promises unyielding support as they navigate these turbulent waters restoring faith back onto your well-being. Our seasoned personal injury attorneys showcasing expertise across dealing with diverse cases would be honored serving on behalf ensuring due rights are duly protected under all circumstances.

Understandably one may be daunted considering legal action against liable parties post having endured through traumatic experiences from intense burn injuries- yet it is crucial that victims realize their entitlements seeking retribution despite severity caused upon them owing irresponsible actions by others. An integral first step receiving rightful restitution is determining true worth of potential claims poised in hand – while understanding this isn’t an easy task, at Carlson Bier we’re dedicated helping make this process smoother; click the button below gauging how much exactly your case holds in worth today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Philo Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Burn Accident FAQ​

There are three main types of burn injuries:

  • First-degree burns: These burns affect the outer layer of skin, the epidermis. They cause redness, pain, and swelling.
  • Second-degree burns: These burns affect the epidermis and the dermis, the second layer of skin. They cause redness, pain, swelling, and blistering.
  • Third-degree burns: These burns destroy the epidermis and the dermis, and can also damage the underlying tissues. They cause white, leathery, or charred skin.

Burn injuries can be caused by a variety of factors, including:

  • Heat: This includes flames, hot liquids, steam, and hot objects.
  • Electricity: Electrical burns can be caused by contact with live wires or outlets.
  • Chemicals: Chemical burns can be caused by exposure to acids, alkalis, and other corrosive substances.
  • Radiation: Radiation burns can be caused by exposure to ultraviolet (UV) rays from the sun or to other types of radiation.

The signs and symptoms of a burn injury will vary depending on the severity of the burn. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Redness
  • Pain
  • Swelling
  • Blistering
  • Charred skin
  • Difficulty breathing
  • Shock

The treatment options for burn injuries will vary depending on the severity of the burn. However, some common treatment options include:

  • First-degree burns: These burns typically heal on their own within a few days. However, it is important to keep the area clean and moist.
  • Second-degree burns: These burns may need to be treated with medication or surgery.
  • Third-degree burns: These burns typically require surgery and skin grafts.

.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit if your burn injury was caused by the negligence or recklessness of another person or party. A burn injury lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Philo

Areas of Practice in Philo

Cycling Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Offering professional legal advice for patients of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Hospital Carelessness

Offering specialist legal services for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Obligation

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, extending adept legal help to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Neglect

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Trip Injuries

Specialist in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking recovery for their injuries.

Neonatal Damages

Supplying legal help for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Incidents: Concentrated on helping patients of car accidents obtain equitable compensation for injuries and destruction.

Motorcycle Crashes

Focused on providing legal services for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Providing expert legal representation for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for hurts.

Construction Incidents

Dedicated to defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Impairments

Dedicated to providing compassionate legal advice for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Expertise in dealing with cases for people who have suffered harms from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Committed to legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Wrongful Death

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and professional legal services to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Impairment

Committed to supporting patients with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal representation to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​