FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Phoenix

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you find yourself needing skilled representation in the aftermath of a medical malpractice event, consider turning to Carlson Bier. Renowned for their adept handling of personal injury suits, they specialize specifically in navigating the complex terrain that encompasses Medical Malpractice litigation. Armed with vast experience and proven acumen in championing client rights efficiently, this esteemed legal team strives relentlessly to procure just compensation for victims involved in medical negligence cases. Carlson Bier’s prowess lies not only within rigorous pursuit of justice but also in its superior ability to deliver empathetic yet practical counsel during such traumatic times. Their track record for achieving favorable outcomes is unparalleled; therefore offering potential clients unparalleled expertise and commitment within these particular tort law intricacies. Ultimately, if Professional negligence causing harm has disturbed your tranquility or wreaked havoc on your life or that of your loved ones’, then entrusting Carlton Bier could potentially present a paramount shift towards attaining restorative justice.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Phoenix Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a group of dedicated personal injury attorneys proudly serving our home state of Illinois, committed to providing not only excellent legal services but also significant educational content for you. When it comes to personal injury law, one integral element is understanding Medical Malpractice, which can often seem intricate and overwhelming. Our aim here is to simplify this complex concept so that anyone can understand it and be aware of their rights under Illinois law.

Medical malpractice occurs when a healthcare provider deviates from the established standard of care in treating a patient. The standard refers to what a competent health care professional would have done under similar circumstances considering the patient’s age, gender, overall health condition and similar factors related to the treatment process. This often translates into inflicting unnecessary harm due to negligence or omissions during diagnosis, treatment or even advice relating to a patient’s ailment.

Key features that characterize medical malpractice include:

• A violation of the standard of care – Healthcare providers are required by law to adhere strictly to these standards.

• An injury caused by negligence – Simply showing negligence isn’t enough; there must be an injury resulting from this neglect.

• A significant damage due to injury – For a case be taken up legally under medical malpractice, the patient must show that they suffered damages that involve disability, unusual pain, hardship or significant financial burden.

With Carlson Bier on your side, our skilled team will use expertise honed over countless cases handled across varying degrees of complexity in medical malpractice space throughout Illinois. We strive towards ensuring our clients receive rightful compensation for physical and emotional turmoil experienced because sometimes apologies just aren’t enough! We work tirelessly towards getting you restitution liable for such matters as ongoing medical treatments incurred as result from this grievous wrongdoing including lost wages during illness recovery time and undue mental anguish suffered through ordeal.

Navigating through lawsuit nuances alone might prove challenging wherein having professionals like us makes all difference between winning deserved compensation or sadly losing case. Our medical malpractice attorneys will guide you professionally throughout the whole legal process; from organizing your facts, filling out extensive paper works, negotiating settlements to representing you in a trial if necessary.

Medical malpractice impacts not just your life but those around you too. While we cannot return time back and undo inflicted damage, our commitment is ensuring that guilty parties are held accountable. Let us fight this battle for you defending your rights every step of way so hopefully one day justice served helps ease burdens associated with such unfortunate circumstances.

It’s important to remember that there’s no charge unless we win your case! Yes, at Carlson Bier, our mode of operation stands on contingency basis where any fees collected are only applicable upon successful case conclusion towards client’s favor thereby keeping risks minimal while potential rewards remain high!

Now comes the most critical part: assessing your situation accurately. If suffering results from possible medical malpractice clinical negligence or doctor failings then seek immediate help prevent future harm occurrence by reaching out to us today. We encourage learners having finished reading article content hereunder kindly consider how priceless peace-of-mind reached from professional legal advice can truly be! Therefore after all information presented before concluding deliberation needed might benefit taking action – click button below find out much could obtain as worth potentially via claim pursuing true justice deservedly sought after.

Remember “Justice delayed is Justice denied.” At Carlson Bier don’t let another moment pass without getting clarity on legal standing regarding medical malpractice claims under Illinois law! Click below button immediately determine actual value realizable related ensuing personally injury lawsuits consequent thereof.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Phoenix Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Phoenix

Areas of Practice in Phoenix

Cycling Crashes

Dedicated to legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Scald Wounds

Extending skilled legal support for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Medical Incompetence

Offering dedicated legal assistance for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Responsibility

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, providing professional legal services to clients affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble and Fall Incidents

Expert in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking compensation for their harm.

Newborn Harms

Delivering legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Mishaps: Focused on aiding individuals of car accidents gain equitable remuneration for damages and harm.

Scooter Incidents

Specializing in providing legal services for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Trucking Crash

Providing professional legal advice for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for damages.

Worksite Crashes

Engaged in defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Head Traumas

Dedicated to extending specialized legal assistance for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Adept at handling cases for people who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Specializing in legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Passing

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and skilled legal support to ensure fairness.

Spine Injury

Committed to representing persons with spine impairments, offering professional legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​