Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Phoenix

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If faced with the devastating aftermath of a spinal cord injury, you want an exceptional legal team by your side — Carlson Bier is that team. We are a seasoned group of attorneys experienced in handling complex personal injury cases, and we specialize in representing victims of spinal cord injuries. Our reputation for successful litigation and obtaining significant compensation for our clients has set us apart as leaders within this challenging facet of law. Employing compassion, tenacity, and extensive trial experience, Carlson Bier robustly advocates for each client’s right to recover just compensation; be it from slips or falls causing harm on the low end vertebrae or severe crashes leading to paralysis affecting discs at multiple levels along the spine – every case is handled with dedicated expertise. Regardless where one resides or their incident transpired – including Phoenix-based victims- they can rest assured: choosing Carlson Bier ensures unparalleled representation tailored solely to meet your demands in the face of such life-altering hardships caused by spinal cord injuries.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Phoenix Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, premier personal injury attorneys in Illinois. Our law firm specializes in providing high-quality legal services, particularly in the area of Spinal Cord Injuries (SCIs). As part of our commitment to fostering a well-informed client base, we share crucial insights on this pertinent issue.

Spinal cord injuries are debilitating and life-altering occurrences. At their core, SCIs results from damage to any part of the spinal cord or nerves within the spinal canal. The aftermath can lead to permanent alterations in strength, sensation or other body functions below the point of injury. Much like footprints left behind after a storm, these injuries bear long shadows over people’s lives.

• Traumatic spinal cord injury may happen due to sudden blows or cuts on the spine.

• Vehicular accidents account for nearly half of new SCI cases annually.

• Falls induce more than 15% of SCI incidents especially among individuals aged 65 and above.

There exists an array of symptoms associated with SCIs that any individual should be aware of. These include loss of movement; altered ability to sense heat, cold and touch; changes in sexual function; difficulty breathing, coughing or clearing secretions from lungs; pain heralded by an intense stinging sensation caused by nerve fiber damage in your spinal cord.

In some instances you might also experience spasms or bouts of exaggerated reflex activities as well as poor coordination accompanied by difficulty balancing. Other red flags could range from severe pressure at neck/back/head regions or even paralysis at certain parts hence eliciting abnormally positioned body parts.

At Carlson Bier it is our belief that one must turn disability into possibility. This starts with you holding parties accountable when their negligence causes harm such as SCIs.

We channel years’ worth expertise towards ensuring adequate compensation for things like medical costs covering medication, surgery and rehabilitation therapy which can all spiral out-of-control financially due to their recurring nature synonymous with SCIs.

In addition, our tailored legal solutions can account for emotional and psychological suffering; lost wages due to inability to work; loss of consortium and even home modification costs.

On a more personal level, we strive to be your companions through this uncharted journey handling every intricate legal twist and turn while you focus on the healing process. By employing an empathetic approach, well-hardened by decades of unwavering commitment towards justice in Illinois – we ensure that you’re not alone.

Carlson Bier has anchored its reputation in strong client-lawyer relationships which forms the bedrock of trust essentially required when unraveling specialty areas such as SCIs. While these injuries are indubitably catastrophic, it’s important to remember there always is hope.

We firmly believe that people should never bear additional burdens because someone else acted negligently hence our fervent pursuit of rightful compensations. Our attorneys have gone head-to-head with insurance companies advocating fiercely for rightful settlements owed to our clients. Time after time we’ve risen above the tumultuous seas ensuring successful outcomes sufficiently vindicating those who so unjustly suffered at hands of another’s carelessness.

Taking into account bated breaths replete with anxiety constantly staring at injury victims – talking about spinal cord injuries isn’t just about stating facts but endeavoring to enlighten and drive conversation towards effective interventions. Your wounds might be invisible but they are seen here at Carlson Bier where we draw from relentless dedication pursuing recompense your way!

As leading lights embracing integrity twinned with a deep-seated desire to aid justice find routes it seeks no matter how torturous they turn out – we’ve championed rights for many SCI victims guaranteeing they receive just compensation conducive their normative lives slowly start regaining balance once again.

Take advantage today by getting acquainted first-hand how Carlson Bier transforms lives one case at a time abridged only by principles defining truth as primary litmus test pursuant to every claim. Click on the button below to find out how much your case could be worth and discover the Carlson Bier difference we fervently speak about. Make that bold step forward starting today! It’s time for you to reclaim control of your life post-trauma, anchoring it firmly as you deserve.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Phoenix Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Phoenix

Areas of Practice in Phoenix

Bike Incidents

Dedicated to legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or risky conditions.

Scald Burns

Giving professional legal assistance for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Healthcare Misconduct

Offering experienced legal representation for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Responsibility

Managing cases involving dangerous products, offering expert legal help to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Aged Mistreatment

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall and Stumble Injuries

Professional in managing trip accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking justice for their suffering.

Newborn Harms

Supplying legal help for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Collisions

Incidents: Devoted to helping patients of car accidents receive equitable recompense for damages and destruction.

Motorcycle Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Big Rig Collision

Providing specialist legal advice for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for harms.

Construction Site Mishaps

Focused on advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Neurological Harms

Committed to extending dedicated legal services for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Traumas

Specialized in managing cases for victims who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Unjust Fatality

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and adept legal representation to ensure compensation.

Spine Trauma

Expert in representing victims with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal services to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer