FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Piper City

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

Whether you suffer from a severe or minor spinal cord injury, it is imperative to have an experienced legal advocate like Carlson Bier on your side. Understanding the scientific nature of such injuries enables them to devise the most effective legal strategies. Based in Illinois and proficient in dealing with complex spinal cord injury cases, they offer unrivalled expertise and commitment. Being renowned leaders in this specialty means that all facets of your case will be meticulously examined for comprehensive representation. Spinal Cord Injuries require extensive medical attention; imagine how comforting it would be knowing a revered team such as Carlson Bier defends you relentlessly while pursuing maximum compensation for related expenses, lost income, and emotional agony? They stand passionately by their clients through every step of this challenging process – working intimately with experts to illustrate clearly what happened causatively and what continues medically. Their success stems from folding these narratives into compelling arguments before juries securing deserved justice for clients consistently! Undoubtedly, selecting Carlson Bier should count among your top considerations if seeking a professional advocate following tragic Spinal Cord Injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Piper City Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the profound impact a spinal cord injury can have on your life. As personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our primary objective is to help you navigate the complex legal terrain associated with these traumatic incidents and work towards securing compensation that reflects the gravity of your suffering.

Spinal cord injuries often result from accidents, medical malpractice, or acts of violence, leaving victims facing significant physical challenges and financial uncertainty due to escalating medical bills and loss of income. Upon receiving such an injury, it becomes crucial to consult an attorney who specializes in spinal cord injuries law.

• Importance: By virtue of their expertise within this distinct area of law, our attorneys possess comprehensive knowledge regarding the complexities surrounding spinal cord injury cases; understanding their cause, how they are diagnosed and treated.

• Expertise: Our team will advocate forcefully on your behalf for maximum compensation – ensuring that current needs as well as future necessities like ongoing rehabilitation or disability management costs are covered.

The anatomy of a Spinal Cord Injuries case includes phases comprising initial investigation (where incidences leading up to the accident and parties involved are examined), damage assessment (factoring both immediate & possible future costs incurred due to your condition), negotiation (where our experienced lawyers discuss compensation with opposing counsel or insurance companies) culminating in litigation if necessary. Through every step, you’ll find us by your side – providing unwavering support until justice is meted out.

• Approach: Our approach marries compassion with aggressive advocacy; wherein we evaluate every facet of your circumstances before launching into decisive action.

• Advantages: Having handled countless cases related to different forms of spinal cord injuries – from complete and incomplete paraplegia/quadriplegia to cauda equina syndrome – we know how best to prepare strong legal arguments tailored specifically for each unique situation.

Further expanding numerous unforeseen complications linked with spinal cord injuries like respiratory problems due to compromised lung functioning, bladder and bowel dysfunction, pressure ulcers, chronic pain, to mental health issues including depression or anxiety; we educate you about their potential influence on your claim.

• Clarification: Deciphering medical jargon can get overwhelming for anyone. To anchor transparency throughout the process, our attorneys explain every intricate detail in an understandable manner so there’s no room for ambiguities.

At Carlson Bier, we firmly believe that justice delayed is justice denied – hence we strive to resolve your case as swiftly as possible. However, bearing the unpredictable nature of law in mind where some cases take longer than others – patience acts as a virtue when dealing with personal injury claims like spinal cord injuries.

If you’re suffering from a spinal cord injury due to someone else’s negligence or intentional harm and seeking legal assistance within Illinois; look no further than Carlson Bier – advocates renowned for representing the physically challenged with unwavering dedication and commitment driven by one singular goal – securing rightful assistance aiding recovery and rebuilding lives after catastrophic injuries.

Whether it’s collecting evidence or negotiating settlements, remember that professional guidance makes all the difference in ensuring fair compensation. So don’t bear this burden alone anymore- empower yourself today by tapping into our specialized knowledge about Spinal Cord Injuries litigation strategy at Carlson Bier.

Curious to find out how much your case might be worth? We invite you to click on ‘Calculate Your Case Worth’ button below whereupon our calculator uses data from past cases pertaining to injuries similar to yours forming an estimated value thereby assisting in setting realistic expectations before embarking upon this arduous journey towards restitution together.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Piper City Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Piper City

Areas of Practice in Piper City

Bike Mishaps

Proficient in legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Providing specialist legal services for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Hospital Incompetence

Providing specialist legal services for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Responsibility

Taking on cases involving faulty products, providing professional legal assistance to clients affected by defective items.

Senior Abuse

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Trip and Fall Injuries

Specialist in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking justice for their losses.

Neonatal Damages

Offering legal guidance for families affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Accidents

Crashes: Focused on helping individuals of car accidents gain just remuneration for hurts and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal support for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Trucking Accident

Providing experienced legal support for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for damages.

Worksite Incidents

Engaged in assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Neurological Harms

Expert in delivering dedicated legal support for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Injuries

Specialized in tackling cases for people who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Specializing in legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Loss

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and professional legal services to ensure fairness.

Backbone Trauma

Focused on representing victims with paralysis, offering specialized legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440