...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Pittsfield

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re a resident of Pittsfield stricken with the unfortunate event involving a dog bite injury, Carlson Bier’s expertise is at your disposal. Our Pittsburgh-served clientele testify to our unparallel legal assistance in managing such harrowing ordeals. With an impressive track record in personal injury law spanning across Illinois, we possess extensive knowledge and experience when it comes to handling dog bite injuries effectively and efficiently. We leave no stone unturned when probing into evidence and details that are crucial to your case – from analysing medical records, interviewing eyewitnesses for information, gathering critical facts about the attacking canine to meticulous evaluation of psychological traumas inflicted. At Carlson Bier, every individual matter is treated with utmost attention—keeping clients informed while aggressively pursuing favorable outcomes on their behalf—we understand how important this journey towards justice means for our clients; further proving why we’re the most considered entity for trusted attorney services pertaining specifically to dog-bite injuries within Illinois’ expanse.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Pittsfield Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our expertise in personal injury law extends to include the specific area of dog bite injuries. Located in Illinois, our seasoned attorneys specialize in providing comprehensive legal support and representation for dog bite victims. The ramifications of a dog bite can go beyond just physical harm; there might be psychological damages that linger long after the wounds have healed.

To comprehend how we can assist you, it is vital first to understand what constitutes a dog bite injury case. A prime example would be instances where an unleashed or uncontrolled pet attacks without provocation, causing bodily injuries. However, these cases get complicated by circumstances such as trespassing or provocation on the victim’s part at the time of the incident. Our role involves navigating these complexities to build an unequivocal case that proves negligence on the owner’s part.

• Dog leash laws: One crucial aspect we take into account while reviewing your case is whether any local ordinances pertaining to animal control were violated- typically involving dogs left off-leash in public spaces.

• An animal’s history: We also investigate if any record exists of prior attacks made by the same animal, which may indicate its dangerous propensities.

• Owner negligence: Lastly, key evidence lies in showing owner neglect for maintaining adequate control over their potentially harmful pet.

This unmatched dedication makes us effective advocates for those affected by severe dog bites leading to issues like lacerations, scarring, nerve damage and even emotional trauma such as PTSD. In certain aggravated scenarios where infections or disfigurements are inflicted upon unsuspecting jurisdictions allow for punitive damages from owners with known vicious pets who did not keep them adequately restrained.

Understanding really well all medical implications tied to dog bites is critical towards comprehending your need for justified compensation and justice under law:

• Physical scars and deformations: Depending upon severity and locality of attack – reconstructive surgeries may be required which could potentially bear heavy financial burden onto victims.

• Psychological trauma: Being attacked by an animal frequently results in debilitating fear along with post-traumatic stress disorders for many recurrent victims.

• Infections: Post-bite complications include but are not limited to bacterial infections, cellulitis or possibly even the deadly bacterium Capnocytophaga.

Nonetheless, while we pride ourselves on this comprehensive legal assistance designed to streamline your quest for justice and restoration post a traumatic dog bite injury – we also understand that engaging legal services can be daunting. At Carlson Bier, our priority sets in easing this process through transparent fee structures based on winning the case at hand thereby ensuring it remains affordable irrespective of your financial background.

We are committed to fighting tirelessly on behalf of dog bite victims and would like to inform you that understanding the entirety of your circumstance is paramount towards securing rightful compensation that covers all losses sustained– economic and non-economic alike, as well as any future advancements ensuing from these injuries.

While traversing such a situation could seem immensely overwhelming alone – rest assured knowing our experienced personal injury attorneys are here alongside you ready to untangle this web of complexity via offering vital support every step ahead so consult us today!

In light of everything described above, remember each legal scenario inhabits factors unique unto itself – hence require appropriate professional evaluations. Become active now about deciding what next steps ought be undertaken subsequently after being subject unto such unjust physical harm have beckoned upon you; attempt gaining insight about unequivocal rights as victimised by irresponsible pet owners within jurisdiction where law stands firmly behind those wronged.

Contact us for an obligation-free assessment and click on the button below to discover how much your case might potentially earn in terms of rightful compensation. It is time you take control back over your life & restore previously maintained normalcy without bearing continued expenses – both monetary/emotional intertwined into daily living due actions performed irresponsibly by others upon innocent bystanders like yourself!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Pittsfield Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Pittsfield

Areas of Practice in Pittsfield

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Specializing in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Fire Burns

Extending adept legal advice for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Healthcare Negligence

Ensuring experienced legal assistance for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Liability

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, supplying expert legal assistance to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Trip Incidents

Skilled in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking redress for their losses.

Childbirth Wounds

Extending legal support for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Incidents: Committed to guiding clients of car accidents secure just remuneration for injuries and destruction.

Scooter Accidents

Committed to providing legal support for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Truck Incident

Providing specialist legal advice for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for harms.

Building Accidents

Focused on representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Cerebral Damages

Expert in offering specialized legal assistance for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Wounds

Skilled in managing cases for victims who have suffered injuries from dog bites or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Accidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Wrongful Passing

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and experienced legal support to ensure redress.

Vertebral Impairment

Dedicated to assisting individuals with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal support to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​