FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Plainfield

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been a victim of a pedestrian accident in Plainfield, the law firm Carlson Bier is here to assist. We understand how imperative it is that you receive proper legal representation to ensure your rights are protected. With extensive experience exclusively dealing with personal injury and pedestrian accidents, we bring unmatched expertise and compassion to each case we handle. Our devotion lies in providing exemplary service while fighting for maximum compensation on our client’s behalf rather than settling for less. Adjusting after an accident can be overwhelming; having someone at your side who genuinely cares about your well-being can make all the difference in the world. Deftly navigating through complex Illinois laws, our team consistently achieves favorable outcomes by employing strategic tactics tailored to unique aspects of every case presented before us.Whether struggling with medical bills or coming terms with losses incurred – choose Carlson Bier as allies throughout this challenging journey.Solidifying its reputation as top-notch lawyers specializing in Pedestrian Accidents – when picking counsel whose intentions align sincerely with yours – trust only Carlson Bier!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Plainfield Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, revered personal injury attorneys with a significant footprint in Illinois. We specialize in an array of fields within personal injury law and are particularly knowledgeable on Pedestrian Accident law. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), thousands of pedestrians lose their lives every year in traffic accidents, while tens of thousands suffer injuries. In Illinois alone, the figures are alarming which makes it crucial for victims or their families to understand this aspect of the law.

Pedestrian Accident laws rest firmly at the intersection between civil rights and traffic rules providing essential protections for those walking or running along our roadsides. These laws dictate that motorists should yield to pedestrians crossing roadways within marked crosswalks, giving them ample time to navigate across safely. Further, Illinois state law mandates that if a pedestrian is struck by a moving vehicle resulting in serious injuries through no fault of their own, they hold unequivocal right to seek compensation.

We observe some key elements when representing clients involved in Pediatric Accidents:

– Documenting evidence from crash scene including photos, witness contact information and police reports

– Communicating with insurance companies on behalf of our clients

– Handling medical bill negotiations

– Pursuing full extent of damages including lost wages, pain and suffering

At Carlson Bier we’ve anchored our practice around a passion for justice – especially ensuring that victims obtain fair settlements or verdicts against negligent drivers who cause harm. Our commitment extends beyond mere representation before courts; we provide compassionate counsel supporting you throughout what can often be an emotionally draining process.

Illinois’ comparative negligence standard applies frequently within this area as well; essentially, even if the pedestrian contributed slightly towards the accident or injuries sustained (e.g., jaywalking or not using crosswalk carefully), he/she can still recover damages provided they were less than 50% at fault. Understanding these details enables us guide you effectively towards securing your rightful compensation.

Moreover, time is of essence when filing a Pedestrian Accident case in Illinois. The statute of limitations stipulates that these cases should be filed within two years from the date of an accident. Late filings may lead to dismissal of your case irrespective of its merits.

Car accidents and other scenarios causing pedestrian injuries can widely vary in terms of their complexity and magnitude; however, our team possesses extensive experience navigating all such types navigated before. Persistent research on the latest rulings and adherence to ethical standards are equally paramount for us, upholding client rights while pursuing maximum compensation painstakingly.

At Carlson Bier, we understand how life can abruptly change after enduring an injury incident – this fuels our drive towards making real difference in victims’ lives. Our highly skilled lawyers are ready to review your personal circumstances thoroughly at no cost upfront. We work solely on a contingency fee basis meaning if you don’t win or settle, there’s absolutely no fee.

Our constant dedication coupled with deep industry understanding uniquely position us as valuable allies during challenging times post-accidents thus earning precious trust among clients across entire state progressively.

Ready to discover more? This platform offers unlimited resources about myriad personal injury claims precursors for permitting users comprehensive education by simple navigation beneath straightforward categories.

Right now you may have multiple questions concerning your potential claim plus its worth particularly given unique variables present within every individual case – rightfully so! Let’s unravel answers together: clear your doubts by tapping the button below soliciting free consultation; explore what each step post-accident entails towards recovering the highest possible settlement under law in tandem with sound advice only Carlson Bier attorneys offer.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Plainfield Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Plainfield

Areas of Practice in Plainfield

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Specializing in legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Burn Damages

Giving professional legal assistance for patients of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Clinical Misconduct

Extending experienced legal assistance for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Accountability

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, offering professional legal services to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Misconduct

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Fall Mishaps

Professional in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking restitution for their losses.

Infant Wounds

Supplying legal support for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Car Incidents

Accidents: Concentrated on guiding patients of car accidents get reasonable remuneration for harms and impairment.

Scooter Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Trucking Incident

Offering adept legal assistance for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for hurts.

Building Site Collisions

Dedicated to representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Head Injuries

Focused on delivering dedicated legal representation for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Wounds

Specialized in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered damages from dog bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Committed to legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unfair Loss

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and adept legal services to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Damage

Dedicated to assisting individuals with vertebral damage, offering expert legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440