FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Pleasant Plains

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’ve fallen victim to a dog bite injury in Pleasant Plains, your priority should be recovery. Simultaneously, navigating the complex world of personal injury law is vital, and that’s where Carlson Bier steps into the picture as an outstanding choice for representation. Committed to excellence and rooted in Illinois, our firm boasts a comprehensive understanding of personal accident laws; specifically those related to Dog Bite Injuries. Our lawyers are adept at meticulously assessing each case to construct a tactical action plan tailored precisely according to your needs and ensuring optimal results. By selecting Carlson Bier, you’re partnering with seasoned professionals who maintain excellent communication throughout proceedings – shedding continual light on intricate legal jargon so that you stay informed every step of the way. We deeply empathize with any agony endured from unfortunate incidents such as animal attacks—we make it our mission not just to represent but also support victims through such stressful times professionally and compassionately because at Carlson Bier we firmly believe – You deserve justice.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Pleasant Plains Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury claims and have deep expertise in representing victims of dog bite injuries. Our team consists of experienced attorneys that are based out of Illinois, committed to fighting for the rights and entitlements of persons who’ve been mentally or physically traumatized by such incidents.

Dog bites can not only cause physical harm but also provoke psychological distress; the consequences can often be long-term. These repercussions aren’t confined to severe flesh wounds alone but sometimes result in infections like Rabies or Tetanus, scarring, disfigurement, nerve damage, or emotional trauma – all potentially life-altering conditions. Major factors contributing to dog bite severity include dog breed, the unpredictability of animal behavior, lack of proper training or containment measures from owners causing attacks on unsuspecting individuals.

Understanding Illinois’ unique legal approach towards handling dog bite cases is crucial in framing your claim effectively. The state follows a ‘strict liability’ doctrine wherein the owner is liable regardless if they were aware or unaware of their pet’s potential aggressive nature:

•This ‘Strict Liability’ aspect may alleviate some pressure from the victim’s side at proving negligence.

•It’s enough to establish that the dog assaulted you unprovoked when you were lawfully present at that location.

•If the owner argues about contributory negligence claiming an intentional provoking act triggered their pet’s aggression, it directly interferes with this strict liability regulation offering them a possible defense route.

When a loved one succumbs to a fatal attack, surviving family members could file wrongful death lawsuits seeking compensation for loss and suffering endured because of their tragic circumstance. However attractive these options sound legally though, identifying and pursuing actual recovery sources could involve navigating complex insurance coverage disputes which shows why professional guidance becomes necessary here.

Engaging Carlson Bier to represent your interests means you’re arming yourself with much more than skilled litigators; we extend our concern as compassionate counselors understanding your unique situation and goods at building warm client relationships. We guide you through intricate legal procedures, nurturing and safeguarding your rights at every step to maximize deserved compensation.

At this junction, it’s important to dispel a common misconception about attorneys – contrary to popular belief; quality legal aid isn’t just about settling for the highest bidder! With Carlson Bier, it’s our priority to bring premium representation within everyone’s reach; transparently tailoring payment models on contingent fee arrangements basis. As such we only charge once a victorious conclusion gets arrived at.

We firmly believe in providing potential clients with all the necessary resources they need to make educated decisions regarding their lawsuit. Our website offers an abundance of free educational publications detailing diverse personal injury topics where they can be downloaded without obligations whatsoever!

Remember, each statute of limitations sets specific time limits in Illinois for filing injury claims post-incident dates – hence ascertaining an attorney promptly after encountering dog bite incidents should stay high up on your agenda.

Carlson Bier is steadfast in our dedication towards serving injured parties by offering sound advice and fighting relentlessly for what you truly deserve as victimized citizens. No matter how formidable opponents appear or how intricate their defenses get manipulated; we pledge unwav(er)ing passion and commitment towards securing justice on behalf of our clients.

We invite dog bite victims from anywhere across Illinois who strive relentlessly at regaining normalcy back into their lives amidst challenging times. Reach out now via the button below to estimate claim values that you rightly deserve!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Pleasant Plains Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Pleasant Plains

Areas of Practice in Pleasant Plains

Bike Crashes

Proficient in legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or risky conditions.

Scald Damages

Offering expert legal help for victims of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Clinical Misconduct

Delivering dedicated legal assistance for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Accountability

Taking on cases involving defective products, extending expert legal assistance to clients affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Abuse

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble & Slip Accidents

Specialist in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking redress for their injuries.

Newborn Wounds

Offering legal help for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Crashes: Committed to aiding clients of car accidents obtain fair recompense for damages and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal support for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

18-Wheeler Accident

Ensuring expert legal support for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for damages.

Worksite Collisions

Committed to advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Cerebral Impairments

Committed to delivering expert legal assistance for victims suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Damages

Skilled in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered damages from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Focused on legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Loss

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and experienced legal guidance to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Injury

Committed to assisting persons with backbone trauma, offering expert legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440