...

Bicycle Accidents in Pocahontas

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unfortunate event of a bicycle accident, finding an experienced attorney is vital. Carlson Bier, based in Illinois, provides superior legal counsel for such situations. Our law firm has built a reputation on successfully defending victims of cycling mishaps and possesses comprehensive knowledge about all aspects unique to these accidents. We understand that each case holds its own complexities; whether concerning fault allocation or varying insurance policies. By choosing Carlson Bier to represent your interests, you can count on our unparalleled expertise as we guide you through this complex process with professionalism and compassion. Even more crucially, we are cognizant of Pocahontas’ local regulations surrounding biking incidents which serves to fortify our legal strategies specific to clients from this area thereby ensuring optimal outcomes for your case. When it comes down to it: Proximity may change but quality never does – so turn towards Carlson Bier’s illustrious track record when seeking representation for bicycle accident-related benefits claims because – wherever you are – You matter!

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Pocahontas Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your foremost go-to law firm for personal injury cases in Illinois. Our specialty is committed not only to legal prowess but to arming you with robust knowledge. Today, we draw our lens upon Bicycle Accidents—an alarming instance of personal injury the consequences of which ripple far beyond the physical realm.

The incidence of bicycle accidents amasses a significant chunk of traffic-related injuries and fatalities every year; unfortunately, their impact never ceases at mere statistics. Behind each figure are victims faced with medical bills, lost wages due to incapacitation, pain and suffering that stretches both physically and psychologically—the full extent of which can be hard to quantify immediately after an accident. But no cyclist should bear these alone—the legal safeguards are built for this very purpose.

At Carlson Bier, we delve deep into your experience—each case treated with singular attention—to fight for maximum compensation due you under the law’s provisions. Each permutation has its unique elements deserving thorough investigation. Let us guide through steps crucial in building a winning case:

– Preserve evidence: Physical artefacts from the scene like damaged bike parts or clothing can significantly bolster a case.

– Document all medical procedures: Not just major surgeries or treatments but also minor check-ups and rehabilitation visits.

– Detail emotional or psychological effects: Personal injury extends far beyond physical wounds; mental trauma bears equal weightage under justice’s gavel.

– Track loss of income: If recovering from bicycle accident-induced injuries kept you off work it stands as a factor when claiming rightful compensation.

Bicycle accidents may range from getting hit by motor vehicles or stumbling upon road defects caused by construction negligence—or even other cyclists’ reckless conduct—all classified under actionable personal injury claims. As attorneys specialising in this ambitiously vast field—we aim to unravel complexities so you have sound understanding without wading through copious legal terminologies:

• Negligence – The most common ground for filing a claim rests on proving another party’s carelessness or failure to act responsibly, which led to the accident.

• Product Liability – If your bicycle was defectively manufactured or designed and that posed a direct cause to the accident—this concept comes into play.

• Wrongful Death – If, tragically, the bicycle accident leads to a fatal outcome—for surviving kin pursuing justice for their loved one—it is under this purview.

Yet the law doesn’t act as an automatic blanket of protection—the question isn’t just about determining who is at fault but factoring in comparative negligence standards where Illinois operates on a system called ‘modified comparative fault.’ The compensation you may receive gets reduced by any degree you are found responsible for the accident. So if 10% blame lies on your shoulders—you can only claim up to 90% of total compensation from the other party/parties. This juncture points toward the indispensable role efficient legal counsel plays—inaccurate representation can leave considerable fractions of compensations unclaimed amidst myriad nuances.

We fervently believe knowledge arms you with power. Here at Carlson Bier, significant commitment is poured into ensuring our clients spend less time worrying over complexities and more time healing from their experiences; because your Protection is Our Priority.

Having ventured together through this primer on Bicycle Accidents and armed with newfound understanding—there still remains a most crucial Pot-of-Gold question: How much could your case be worth? Legal wordings stand rigidly black-or-white—but each individual incident paints its own shade within.

So we urge you—it’s now moment ripe ripe to Unmask what You duly deserve! Aren’t those digits dancing behind veils of uncertainty better off out here in clear sight?

Embark upon that Discovery right now…snug at comfort of home—or wherever beloved WiFi embraces you—and click on this button below:

‘Find Out How Much Your Case May Be Worth’. With dedication distilled by round-the-clock perseverance waiting eagerly at the other end; walk steadily past doorways of apprehension—this journey for Justice must unfurl untraveled frontiers!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Pocahontas Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Pocahontas

Areas of Practice in Pocahontas

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Expert in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or risky conditions.

Fire Injuries

Providing skilled legal assistance for people of major burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Physician Misconduct

Delivering professional legal representation for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Fault

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, supplying professional legal assistance to customers affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble and Trip Accidents

Professional in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking compensation for their losses.

Newborn Wounds

Providing legal guidance for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Incidents: Concentrated on helping patients of car accidents secure just compensation for wounds and damages.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal assistance for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Truck Mishap

Extending expert legal support for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for losses.

Construction Site Crashes

Engaged in advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Head Traumas

Focused on delivering compassionate legal assistance for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Injuries

Specialized in handling cases for victims who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Dedicated to legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Unfair Death

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and professional legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Backbone Impairment

Focused on supporting clients with spine impairments, offering expert legal assistance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer