...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Pocahontas

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking representation for Dog Bite Injuries in Pocahontas, trust the competency of Carlson Bier. Our formidable team possesses vast expertise, providing top-tier legal assistance to victims of dog bite injuries. We navigate complex legal procedures with precision and dedication, while ensuring your rights are safeguarded throughout the process. Illinois litigation can be intricate; hence our skilled attorneys leverage their profound knowledge around state-specific statutes that regulate dog-related incidents. Fault determination is often challenging in such scenarios but we’re here to guide you diligently during each step of proving liability to secure justice deserved by you or a loved one involved in a canine attack incident. Decades-long experience has equipped us to perform flawlessly under high-stake pressures associated with personal injury trials like these. Immediate medical care costs, possible future health implications and psychological traumas are just some factors that Carlson Bier meticulously attends when advocating for maximum compensation on behalf of clients we represent who suffered from Dog Bite Injuries.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Pocahontas Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we offer premier legal services for victims of dog bite injuries in Illinois. As a respected law firm that takes pride in defending the rights of our clients and helping them secure fair settlements, we combine expertise, compassion, and commitment to make your journey towards compensation as smooth as possible. You can trust us to navigate the complexities of personal injury law so you can focus on what matters most – healing.

Dog bite injuries can occur anytime, anywhere – in a public place, at someone’s home or even while walking down the street minding your own business. When they do happen, they are not only physically painful but emotionally scarring and potentially expensive due to medical bills accrued from treatment. The effects can be far-reaching causing psychological trauma that might necessitate therapy created by fear or phobic reactions to dogs later in life.

In the aftermath of such an unfortunate event, it is crucially important to understand exactly what you’re entitled to under Illinois’ personal injury laws. Here’s some concise yet comprehensive information about these laws:

– Liability: In Illinois, dog owners are held strictly liable for any injuries caused by their pets.

– Statute of Limitations: It’s essential to know that any lawsuit related to dog bites needs filing within two years from the date the injury occurred.

– Comparative Negligence: If an injured party was provoking the dog or performing unlawful activities when bitten; his/her damages could be reduced based on comparative negligence rules.

We firmly believe that education empowers action and more individuals should be aware regarding this topic. After all, knowledge is power.

Here at Carlson Bier we’re dedicated toward supporting you throughout every stage of your case—from initial consultations where we’ll discuss likely outcomes based on past rulings essaying similar circumstances through tirelessly fighting for rightful compensation during trail proceedings if necessary till finally achieving a substantial settlement aimed solely towards rectifying all ills inflicted upon our esteemed clientele.

Once you decide to work with us, we’ll carry out a thorough investigation on your behalf. Our dedicated staff will reach out to potential witnesses, collect evidence by taking photographs of the location where the incident happened as well as documenting all physical injuries and trauma endured with meticulous attention to detail. We aim to build a solid case that efficiently supports your claim for rightful compensation so you can embark on your path towards recuperation peacefully, knowing you’re in safe hands.

Before proceeding with legal action after sustaining dog bite injuries, it’s imperative that victims seek medical treatment promptly reporting every single detail about their encounter. In fact it’s a good idea to retain pertinent records including date/time when incident occurred, pictures highlighting severity plus vivid descriptions of said event since this kind of documentation can substantially strengthen one’s case against negligent pet owners therefore making sure successful restitution seems more achievable than before when facing daunting consequences alone without professional guidance alongside them helping navigate difficult waters upon which they unfortunately find themselves forced into due unforeseen circumstances.

One thing noteworthy aside from mentioned factors above; remember never sign anything or accept any settlement offers from the dog owner’s insurance company without consulting an attorney first. Their main focus is reducing costs—not providing fair compensation for your injuries. Turn instead towards competent legal representation like us here at Carlson Bier who vow working tirelessly until justice served no matter how complex situations might become ensuring maximum financial payouts ultimately help get life back track quickly sparing clients unnecessary anxiety fueled fear-inducing adversities usually faced alone challenging moments desperately need someone there beside comforting guiding light slowly but surely making certain obstacles crossed over safely thereby instilling renewed sense hope within heart despite hardship.

If you’ve been a victim of a dog bite injury in Illinois, feel free to contact us today for a straightforward evaluation of your circumstance warranting recovery aided by our exceptional service promise delivering not only expert advice but also unwavering support throughout each phase involved resulting integrity-driven advocacy unmatched within industry standards aiming towards providing nothing less than absolute satisfaction guaranteed clientele who trust their affairs entrusted under capable hands like ours at Carlson Bier. Tempted to find out how much your case is worth? Click the button below right now for a free and confidential consultation!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Pocahontas Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Pocahontas

Areas of Practice in Pocahontas

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Focused on legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Providing skilled legal advice for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Offering expert legal representation for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Liability

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, offering specialist legal support to clients affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Abuse

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip and Stumble Incidents

Skilled in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking compensation for their damages.

Newborn Harms

Offering legal aid for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Incidents

Accidents: Dedicated to assisting individuals of car accidents secure appropriate compensation for damages and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Expert in providing representation for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Extending specialist legal advice for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just claims for hurts.

Worksite Incidents

Dedicated to advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Neurological Traumas

Committed to providing compassionate legal representation for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Wounds

Specialized in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered damages from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Focused on legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Fatality

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and adept legal support to ensure compensation.

Backbone Harm

Focused on defending persons with paralysis, offering dedicated legal representation to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer