FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Pocahontas

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to pedestrian accident representation, Carlson Bier is a top-tier choice given their extensive experience and dedicated approach. As a highly regarded law firm in Illinois, the attorneys at Carlson Bier understand that every pedestrian accident claim presents unique challenges and requires meticulous attention. Whether you’ve been harmed due to a driver’s negligence or city flaws causing unsafe conditions, our knowledgeable team stands ready to help you navigate the complex legal process. We consider all facets of your experience – from emotional distress to medical bills – striving for maximum compensation on your behalf. Carlson Bier’s reputation for robust advocacy has won us recognition among peers and clients alike, testament of our commitment towards achieving justice for victims of accidents statewide including those originating in Pocahontas. Trusting your case with Carlson Bier means entrusting it to skilled professionals driven by empathy and legal acumen; offering assurance even amid difficult times. Partner with us as we steadfastly champion your rights leading towards fair resolution.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Pocahontas Illinois

Pedestrian accidents are unfortunate incidents that bring unthinkable physical, emotional and financial pain. Having the right legal representation when navigating such tragedies is crucial, which is where Carlson Bier steps in- your dedicated personal injury lawyer based in Illinois. Specializing in pedestrian accident cases, our firm has a wealth of knowledge coupled with years of experience to help victims secure justice.

Pedestrian collisions often result from distracted driving, speeding, disobeying traffic signals or drunk driving. Several factors can be considered negligence in these scenarios and it’s eye-opening how laws play out differently under varying circumstances. If you’ve been injured as a pedestrian, it’s important to know:

• Negligence rules: These dictate who is liable for an accident.

• Damage caps: Each state may limit the amount that may be awarded for various damage types.

• Shared fault rules: In many intersections of law, shared blame can significantly impact damages.

Understanding these legal intricacies isn’t simple but fear not because Carlson Bier attorneys are well-adept at explaining complex details into easily comprehendible facts.

Elucidating on negligence rules; they essentially detail what actions or failure to act led to someone being injured undeservingly. For instance, if Driver A was texting while driving and hit Pedestrian B crossing the road legally; Driver A would usually be held negligent for failing to pay proper attention while driving.

Moving onto damage caps; although allowed by laws governing some states, Illinois fortunately does not have imposed limits on damages awarded in personal injury cases giving room for comprehensive compensation covering medical expenses, pain and suffering among others.

Lastly touching upon shared fault rules; even if you partially caused the accident (say you were crossing against a red light), you aren’t barred from collecting damages based on Illinois’ comparative negligence law. However it reduces any award by your share of blame – another critical reason why having experienced lawyers like those at Carlson Bier can make all the difference.

Post-accident, you may feel overwhelmed and uncertain. In such a taxing space, trusting your case to trained professionals can alleviate some of your burden. Our approach involves breaking down complex realities into digestible information to give you clarity and sound direction.

At Carlson Bier, we understand the importance of immediate action after a pedestrian accident as evidence tends to diminish as time proceeds. Our expertise lies in swiftly collecting crucial evidence like physical debris from scene, witness accounts and camera footages along with meticulously analyzing police reports to build compelling claims on behalf of our clients. These carefully plotted steps taken at an early stage are instrumental in safeguarding rights thus ensuring fair compensation for victims’ medical bills, loss of wages during recovery period and more critically their mental anguish.

When it comes to legal help post a pedestrian accident, rely on Carlson Bier where client satisfaction is not just an aim but our standard operating mold itself. We work tirelessly because when representing a victim’s case; fighting for justice is about more than just dollars – it’s about leveling things in favor of those who have been wronged distastefully.

If you or a loved one has suffered due to another’s recklessness while out walking the Illinois streets risk-free, take solace knowing that experienced advocates are here ready to fight fiercely on your behalf with unwavering commitment. Contact us today to learn more about navigating these unfortunate life events without bearing the brunt alone.

Worrying won’t get much done but reaching out will! Don’t stay in darkness regarding potential payout sums anymore – click on the button below so that we can use our extensive experience towards giving you insights into how much your case could be worth according to laws governing Illinois. Act swiftly now by getting yourself this vital piece of knowledge.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Pocahontas Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Pocahontas

Areas of Practice in Pocahontas

Bicycle Mishaps

Proficient in legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or risky conditions.

Flame Wounds

Providing expert legal assistance for people of grave burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Physician Carelessness

Providing specialist legal support for victims affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Fault

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, supplying skilled legal help to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Senior Neglect

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble and Stumble Injuries

Specialist in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking redress for their suffering.

Childbirth Harms

Extending legal guidance for households affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Collisions

Mishaps: Focused on helping patients of car accidents obtain reasonable settlement for injuries and losses.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on providing legal assistance for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Big Rig Crash

Offering experienced legal representation for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for injuries.

Building Site Crashes

Committed to assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Neurological Traumas

Expert in extending expert legal advice for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Adept at managing cases for victims who have suffered damages from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Crashes

Focused on legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unfair Loss

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and expert legal assistance to ensure justice.

Neural Impairment

Expert in supporting clients with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​