...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Bicycle Accidents in Polo

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

As Carlson Bier, we are renowned for delivering reliable legal representation in Bicycle Accidents. Our team of seasoned attorneys has an extensive understanding of the complexity surrounding these cases in Illinois, exceptionally Polo city. We skillfully navigate the local laws while tirelessly advocating for our client’s rights and striving to achieve substantial compensation after Bicycle accidents. Acknowledged for notable successes secured through keen attention to detail and relentless dedication, our practice stands at the forefront when dealing with personal injury claims related to biking mishaps. We provide comprehensive support beginning from initial consultations all through litigation or settlement proceedings if need be; always prioritizing your interests. Partnering with Carlson Bier guarantees access to a wealth of experience tailored towards resulting in satisfactory resolutions for Bicycle Accident victims within Polo city and beyond – solidifying us as a premier consideration when seeking effective counsel on such circumstances that might affect you or your loved ones’ wellbeing. Upholding integrity as our founding principle, Carlson Bier is committed to securing justice and peace of mind you undoubtedly deserve.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Polo Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are deeply committed to protecting the rights of individuals involved in unfortunate bicycle accidents and delivering extensive legal support in Illinois. Our team prioritizes ensuring your understanding of the complex landscape surrounding such incidents. As a personal injury attorney group that has been operating for years, we understand all the facets of personal injury law specific to bicycle matters. These collisions often present unique challenges and require an incisive interpretation and application of state laws—something our attorneys excel at.

Bicycle accidents are characterized by numerous shared elements across most cases revolving around this issue. This includes common types of injuries, possibly liable parties, as well as potential compensatory areas for victims. Some recurring injuries seen include concussions and other head injuries, broken bones or fractures sprains or strains, road rash, dislocations or separations as well as long-term complications like Traumatic Brain Injuries (TBI).

Who can be held responsible? Often solving this question requires expert navigation through a gray area littered with many variables. However, some usual suspects might involve motorists who failed to respect bicyclist’s right-of-way; pedestrians infringing on cycling paths; dog owners allowing their pets’ unrestricted access to public routes thereby causing unanticipated crashes; or government bodies not adequately maintaining roads leading to situations conducive for mishaps.

As you navigate these traumatic incidences, it is important to recognize various damages you may be entitled to compensation for within your claim:

• Medical costs including hospital stays, physiotherapies among others

• Loss of current and future income due to disability caused

• Damage inflicted on your bicycle or any property

• Psychological trauma sustained from the incident

• Wrongful death claims if the accident led unfortunately resulted in a fatality

Our adept team at Carlson Bier capably guides clients through this maze as they seek rightful recovery measurements following cycling incidents.We believe in listening attentively each client’s unique narrative, advising them on the best course forward so they can foster an informed decision. At our legal hub located in Illinois, we aim to unravel complexities and address challenging aspects surrounding bicycle accidents—charting strategic paths that are sensitive to each victim’s reality while maximizing their compensation chances.

At Carlson Bier, even as we help clients build solid cases, further supporting this entire process is understanding local regulation nuances. For instance, under Illinois law (625 ILCS 5/11-1502), every person riding a bicycle upon a roadway shall be granted all of the rights applicable motorists—a statute that often significantly impacts claims.

Understanding these constraints is central to how we work—we do not make empty promises or manipulate situations for advertising purposes. We confirm our physical presence within the regions we serve because legally and ethically, it’s against the Illinois law to claim operation within cities where one does not have an office. Therefore at Carlson Bier, your trust is earned on solid grounds and indefatigable commitment towards securing you justice.

We know seeking compensatory justice after bicycle accidents can be overwhelming for victims. It’s why at Carlson Bier centred in Illinois, we focus on handling all legal aspects—you only need worry about getting back your health and peace of mind.

Our experienced attorneys promise robust representation tailored expressly around your unique case needs—always inspired by compassion, expertise alongside an unwavering dedication towards enhancing your recovery experience following cycling mishaps.

Would you like to discover more? Do you wonder what amount could potentially define your proper compensation? Click on the button below: together let’s explore crucial next steps in assessing just how much worth your case holds with iconic professional support from Carlson Bier beside you every step of the way—because every victim deserves nothing short of rightful justice delivered effectively.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Polo Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Polo

Areas of Practice in Polo

Bicycle Accidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or risky conditions.

Fire Wounds

Extending specialist legal advice for people of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Extending professional legal assistance for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Responsibility

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, supplying specialist legal guidance to consumers affected by harmful products.

Elder Abuse

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Trip Occurrences

Specialist in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking compensation for their injuries.

Childbirth Damages

Extending legal guidance for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Incidents

Incidents: Devoted to aiding sufferers of car accidents secure just payout for damages and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Specializing in providing legal support for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

18-Wheeler Accident

Ensuring adept legal assistance for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for hurts.

Construction Mishaps

Focused on representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Head Damages

Specializing in extending specialized legal support for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Damages

Adept at tackling cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Focused on legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Unjust Fatality

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and professional legal assistance to ensure justice.

Neural Injury

Focused on assisting patients with paralysis, offering specialized legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​