...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Polo

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’ve suffered a dog bite injury in Polo, turn to the esteemed law firm Carlson Bier for proficient legal support. As experts in personal injury law, they particularly excel at tackling dog bite cases. The skilled team is well-versed with Illinois’ unique set of statutes and compensatory elements related to these injuries; thus can represent your case ethically and effectively. Their vast experience enables them to interpret complex laws and ensure their clients get the compensation they justly deserve – be it for medical expenses, lost wages, pain or suffering stemming from such incidents. With Carlson Bier on your side, rest assured that your rights will be secured while aggressively pursuing fair recompense tailored specifically to address your individual circumstances satisfactorily. Navigating through the intricate litigation process becomes less challenging when backed by attorneys who genuinely empathize with victims wrought by traumatic canine-inflicted harm in Polo. So choose wisely – partner with Carlson Bier – a trusted name dedicated accessibility, fairness and success in handling dog-bite cases across Illinois state.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Polo Illinois

Carlson Bier is a seasoned Illinois personal injury law firm that possesses considerable expertise in handling dog bite cases. Owing to our collective legal experience along with our deep understanding of Illinois laws, we provide exceptional representation designed to secure favorable results for victims of dog bites.

Dog Bite Injuries are more common and serious than what most people tend to believe. They often result in significant emotional and physical trauma, requiring medical attention and sometimes even causing long-lasting damage. From lacerations, puncture wounds or fractures due to the forceful bite, to infections such as Pasteurella or Capnocytophaga bacteria which can be life-threatening if it spreads throughout your body; dire outcomes like Rabies, a virus carried by some dogs leading to severe health implications- every single scenario necessitates prompt action.

Moreover, these injuries can precipitate psychological ramifications including Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), causing emotional distress stemming from fear, anxiety, stress-related insomnia among others. Here at Carlson Bier, we understand the severity of such incidents and strive towards helping you navigate through the legal complexities intertwined with them.

Let’s elucidate important aspects meant to inform you better:

• The alarming statistics: Every year nearly 5 million people in America become victims of dog bites where half are children aged between 5-9.

• Illinois laws on Dog Bites: Illinois follows stringent ‘strict liability’ rules for dog owners rather than ‘one-bite’ rule followed by many states. According to this statute even if a dog has never bitten anyone before or shown aggressive tendencies or the owner had no knowledge about its dangerous proclivities; they’re still held accountable provided victim didn’t provoke the dog & was allowed legally on the property where attack occurred.

• Compensation scope: Victims can claim compensation for not only medical expenses but also lost wages during recovery time and non-economic damages linked with pain & suffering.

• Time restrictions: Illinois has a two-year statute of limitations for personal injury suits including dog bite cases.

Unequivocally, Carlson Bier takes these matters seriously and fights rigorously to secure willingness of insurance companies paying rightful compensation monetarily. Our expertise allows us to evaluate the extent your case is worth accurately, accounting for medical expenses, future care costs, lost wages and other non-economic damages. We actively collaborate with you throughout the process keeping you informed at every step so that you understand what’s happening in your case.

We pride ourselves in our meticulous attention to detail, relentless commitment towards our clients which combined with an empathetic approach sets us apart from most law firms. We handle each case individually scrutinizing the facts closely that leads us towards identifying significant details necessary to make a powerful legal argument maximizing your entitlements.

Dog bites can have than just temporary physical harm- they can completely transform lives by inflicting everlasting emotional damage besides substantial financial loss due to medical bills & absence from work hampering family stability given this is also where we step in making sure such negligent dog owners are held accountable providing you JUSTICE through rightful compensation amount!

The legal pursuit might appear daunting especially when one isn’t fully acquainted with intricacies involved hence it’s imperative consulting an experienced personal injury lawyer who thoroughly understands Illinois Dog Bite Laws bolstering your chances eradicating any sort of oppression meted out owing to others’ negligence.

So whether it was a casual walk turned marring or traumatic park visit twist- if you’ve become a victim of such devastations don’t hesitate seeking help because standing up against injustice should never be delayed nor suppressed! Trust Carlson Bier for securing compensation commensurate with pain & suffering borne due to no fault of yours!

At Carlson Bier, we believe justice delayed is justice denied; therefore we invite you explore more about how we can support your fight against this adversity. Tap on the button below and find out how much claim-worthy your case is and take another step forward towards justice. Your journey with us will be one full of understanding, support, and tireless fight for the restitution you deserve.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Polo Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Polo

Areas of Practice in Polo

Bike Crashes

Expert in legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Giving professional legal help for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Healthcare Misconduct

Providing dedicated legal support for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Obligation

Taking on cases involving faulty products, providing adept legal help to customers affected by defective items.

Senior Abuse

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall and Slip Occurrences

Expert in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking restitution for their suffering.

Neonatal Injuries

Extending legal help for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Crashes: Committed to supporting individuals of car accidents secure just remuneration for hurts and harm.

Motorcycle Accidents

Committed to providing legal services for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Semi Mishap

Delivering expert legal support for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for injuries.

Construction Collisions

Focused on supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Neurological Harms

Expert in ensuring specialized legal support for clients suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Injuries

Proficient in addressing cases for persons who have suffered harms from dog bites or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Incidents

Committed to legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Loss

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and adept legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Backbone Damage

Expert in assisting victims with spine impairments, offering professional legal services to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer