...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Port Barrington

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to stellar legal representation for dog bite injuries, Carlson Bier is your ultimate ally. Our outstanding reputation in Port Barrington speaks volumes about our commitment and expertise. Dog bite injuries can be traumatic and life-altering; however, with the proficient team at Carlson Bier handling your case, rest easy knowing we are on your side. Whether you’re dealing with severe physical damages or emotional trauma following a dog attack incident, we strive diligently to ensure you get adequate compensation for all harm incurred. We take pride in navigating the complexities of Illinois laws related to animal attacks and have succeeded in procuring meaningful results for countless clients who have been victims of vicious dog bites within Port Barrington’s jurisdiction. Trust our extensive knowledge and vast experience concerning canine cases to champion justice on your behalf effectively because at Carlson Bier—we don’t merely practice law; we ensure victims’ rights are protected fiercely! Seek representation that champions fairness — put the power of Carlson Bier behind you.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Port Barrington Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our team of highly specialized personal injury lawyers understand the dynamics and legal ramifications behind dog bite injuries. Illnesses like Illinois is home to a vast population of dogs, resulting in an increased potential for dog bite incidents. When such unfortunate encounters occur, they can leave victims with extensive physical harm including cuts, lacerations, broken bones and even psychological distress. Knowing your rights concerning dog bite injuries enhances your ability to claim appropriate compensation.

In Illinois, the law firmly protects individuals who have been bitten or attacked by dogs. The Animal Control Act holds dog owners entirely responsible for any damages caused by their pets if the victim was legally on the property and did not provoke the dog at that time. This full liability ensures that you may receive compensation regardless of whether or not it’s known if the owner’s pet has been dangerous before.

By engaging our services at Carlson Bier, you open an avenue to delve into several pivotal aspects that will be critical to your case:

• Detailed investigation: Our team works diligently alongside professional investigators and healthcare providers.

• Comprehensive analysis of medical reports: We break down complex health jargon into layman’s terms ensuring all aspects of subsequent medical care are considered within your claim.

• Negotiation with insurance companies: Leveraging our exception negotiation skills guarantees maximum payouts on claims.

• Representation in court: Ensuring relevant legal obligations meet trial deadlines propels successful conclusions for our clients.

Dog bites often inflict more than just visible injuries; there’s also a risk of contracting infections such as rabies or tetanus which require immediate medical attention — this treatment can become costly over time. Psychological trauma is another prevalent issue amongst victims; developing phobias towards animals could affect daily life ineffably.

Here at Carlson Bier, we align ourselves with empathy towards what you’re going through besides demonstrating dedication to win you deserving compensation from responsible parties for lost wages due to missed workdays recovery expenses, pain, suffering, and emotional distress. When you choose to work with us, our primary intent is to bring normalcy back into your life by providing financial stability through well-deserved compensation.

We value the significance of educating victims on the Illinois personal injury laws relating to dog bite cases backed by illustrative case studies. Our professional team stands ready to provide insight not only about your possible legal avenues but also on preventative measures to ensure safety from potential future incidents. Outside an overall commitment towards addressing your immediate needs, we strive to create a safer community for everyone— because while Carlson Bier is dedicatedly fighting for justice in dog bite cases; it’s equally important that such incidents become less frequent over time.

It’s worth noting that acting promptly following a dog attack optimizes preserving evidence and increases opportunities for successful rehabilitation. At Carlson Bier, dogs are loveable household pets – but when they cause harm due to owner negligence or oversight, then there has been an unquestionable violation of rights which must be duly addressed.

As you navigate this challenging path post-incident, remember not every outcome might seem straightforward—but working closely with experienced personal injury attorneys at Carlson Bier guarantees streamlined processes and punctuates them with favorable outcomes.

Recognize your rights today. Knowledge forms the first line of defense against insurmountable medical expenses and overwhelming trauma inflicted by canine companions left untrained.

Your journey towards claiming deserved compensation begins here at Carlson Bier—become equipped with clarity during these uncertain times as we educate you on key aspects defining personal injury law pertaining to dog bites within Illinois. Now that you have understood its basics, click on the button below! Find out how much your case could be potentially worth—with no obligation whatsoever because at Carlson Bier – our foremost interest lies in guiding victims towards successfully reclaiming balance disrupted abruptly by unexpected aggressive canine encounters.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Port Barrington Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Port Barrington

Areas of Practice in Port Barrington

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Expert in legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Fire Burns

Extending expert legal services for victims of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Healthcare Malpractice

Providing professional legal advice for persons affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Liability

Addressing cases involving problematic products, extending professional legal help to individuals affected by defective items.

Senior Neglect

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Stumble Injuries

Professional in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking redress for their injuries.

Neonatal Harms

Providing legal guidance for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Incidents: Committed to supporting sufferers of car accidents secure reasonable settlement for hurts and destruction.

Motorbike Mishaps

Dedicated to providing representation for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Trucking Crash

Delivering experienced legal services for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for damages.

Building Site Mishaps

Focused on representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Harms

Committed to ensuring dedicated legal assistance for persons suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Wounds

Skilled in handling cases for persons who have suffered injuries from dog bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Committed to legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unfair Fatality

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and skilled legal services to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Harm

Specializing in advocating for clients with spine impairments, offering professional legal representation to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer