...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Prairie du Rocher

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to figuring out the legal recourses for dog bite injuries in Prairie du Rocher, you need a team of seasoned experts equipped with their extensive experiences and proven results. That’s where Carlson Bier steps in; an Illinois-based personal injury law firm specializing in Dog Bite Injuries cases. Leveraging our comprehensive knowledge of Illinois Personal Injury Laws, we assist victims to navigate even through the most complex situations, ensuring they receive fair compensation for their trauma while helping them understand intricate legal ramifications associated with such incidents. Regardless of how grisly your case is, count on us to handle it innovatively and aggressively. At Carlson Bier, our commitment extends beyond plain courtroom battles; we dedicate ourselves wholeheartedly to restoring peace back into your life after a traumatic incident like a dog bite injury alters it irrevocably. We’re committed not just towards ensuring justice is served adequately but also at providing emotional empowerment amidst distressful circumstances prevalent post-dog-bite-injury cases experienced by any citizens irrespective of their location.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Prairie du Rocher Illinois

Dog bite injuries can be an unexpected and traumatic event, suddenly turning a simple day into a complex web of physical pain and emotional distress. At Carlson Bier, we understand the impact these incidents have on individuals and their families. As experienced personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our legal expertise spans various areas within personal injury law, including dog bite cases.

Dog bites can result in severe physical injuries that necessitate costly medical treatment. These injuries may include puncture wounds, nerve damage, infection risk, and even harm to bones or ligaments. Moreover, they often lead to significant psychological trauma such as fear and anxiety disorders.

It is important to know that you don’t have to face this situation alone. The law provides several protections for victims of dog bite accidents which allow you to seek compensation for incurred damages.

• In Illinois under the Animal Control Act, the owner of a dog is liable for any damage suffered by someone who is attacked by their pet without provocation.

• This includes full responsibility for covering medical bills associated with treating the injury.

• Emotional distress caused by a dog attack or bite is also recognized by courts as meriting financial compensation.

• Lost wages due to missing work while recovering are another form of damage that can be factored into your claim.

At Carlson Bier, our first step will involve fully understanding the facts surrounding your case; we want to comprehend not only what occurred during the incident itself but also how it has affected your life since then. We will liaise directly with insurance companies on your behalf in order to secure full restitution for all damages you’ve endured.

Beyond just seeking out financial compensation though – we believe it’s crucial also not disregard available non-monetary solutions like counselling or therapy; because healing from such traumatic experiences requires more than simply nursing physical wounds.

While we champion assertiveness when negotiating settlements with opposing parties – it’s important for everyone involved realize that sometimes litigation might become necessary secure the justice our clients deserve. If your claim escalates to this level, we will aggressively litigate on your behalf in court and stand beside you each step of the way.

We hold a deep understanding of Illinois dog bite laws so at Carlson Bier, we’re best positioned to represent you robustly – ensuring your rights are upheld and that you receive far-reaching remedies for all damages sustained.

Unlike gimmicks which only emphasize winning rates – what truly differentiates our approach is dedication towards ensuring satisfaction well beyond settling case. This means keeping you informed every progress made, upholding highest standards professionalism throughout process guarantee not just favorable outcomes but also meaningful client experiences.

Our core belief is everyone deserves attorney who listens their needs concretely addresses them; because at end day it’s about helping regain sense normalcy life perhaps was taken away from as result accident. We proudly embody these values daily work commitment consistency has certainly bolstered reputation among personal injury attorneys within state Illinois acting affirmatively redefine client service quality within industry.

Let us help determine how much value there may be in your potential case. Every situation is unique—we know all too well that no two dog bite injuries are alike—and your legal strategy should reflect this fact. Allow Carlson Bier’s team of skilled attorneys to alleviate some of the burden during this challenging period by allowing us campaign fiercely securing justice you absolutely deserve.

Clicking below offers a free initial consultation with one of our experienced personal injury professionals to discuss specifics related to your incident and provide guidance on how best navigate gruelling repercussions following events leading present circumstances. So don’t forget: click button below now let us assist exploring possible outcomes together!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Prairie du Rocher Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Prairie du Rocher

Areas of Practice in Prairie du Rocher

Cycling Mishaps

Dedicated to legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or hazardous conditions.

Scald Damages

Offering expert legal services for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Clinical Malpractice

Ensuring experienced legal support for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Accountability

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, offering skilled legal support to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Abuse

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Trip Occurrences

Expert in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking redress for their injuries.

Newborn Wounds

Supplying legal aid for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Crashes

Mishaps: Committed to supporting individuals of car accidents receive equitable payout for injuries and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal services for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Truck Accident

Ensuring expert legal support for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for injuries.

Worksite Mishaps

Dedicated to representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Brain Injuries

Dedicated to providing expert legal assistance for persons suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Injuries

Proficient in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered harms from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Collisions

Dedicated to legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Fatality

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and expert legal guidance to ensure justice.

Vertebral Damage

Focused on representing patients with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​