FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Prairie du Rocher

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’ve been involved in a pedestrian accident within the Prairie du Rocher area, Carlson Bier fundamentally understands your concerns and needs for obtaining justice. Specializing in Pedestrian Accident law, our team is equipped with an intellectual arsenal that sets us apart from competitors on both the local and national stage. Our commitment towards clients determines our approach – aggressive when necessary to secure fair compensation while maintaining empathy for trauma endured by victims of preventable mistakes. Led by experts who adamantly pursue continuous education in Illinois’ evolving road safety regulations, we ensure that legal loopholes do not rob you of rightful claims regarding accidents caused due to others’ neglectful conduct on the streets.

Choosing us guarantees exceptional experience coupled with result-driven strategies structured solely around your case’s distinct takeaways.

Carlson Bier provides relentless pursuit pertinent to Pedestrian Accident consequences;

Injury claims handling stemming from city crossing incidents or vehicle-operator violation against pedestrian right-of-way constitutionally secured under fundamental traffic laws are all meticulously handled at Carlson Bier -providing essential guidance during one’s most significant times of need- making them an ideal selection as your watchdog attorney firm for any scenario involving pedestrian accidents.

Our strength – Your victory! Choose wisely; Choose Carlson Bier!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Prairie du Rocher Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we recognize the severity and frequency of pedestrian accidents in Illinois. Our personal injury lawyers aim to educate you on this grave matter and each client’s legal rights after such an unfortunate event. We believe knowledge is power, so arm yourself with understanding before stepping into the world of legal nuances.

Pedestrian accidents can have long-term impacts that you may not immediately realize, especially when it comes to overshadowing issues like emotional trauma or future medical complications. A primary focus of our firm is ensuring any settlement received is ample enough to cover all unforeseen aspects that might occur down the line. To ensure this, some of our key steps include:

• Exhaustively investigating your accident

• Thoroughly examining medical records

• Nominalizing lost wages due to injuries sustained

Beware that insurance companies will often attempt quick settlements tied with full release terms. Hence, it becomes crucial not to sign any agreements without the counsel of a qualified lawyer from Carlson Bier who can decode these complex documents for you.

Every pedestrian accident case has its unique attributes; thus, differently treated by law in Illinois. For instance,

– If proven negligent behavior like drunk driving caused the accident, punitive damages could get awarded.

– Comparative negligence applies where if both parties share blame but as long as a pedestrian’s fault doesn’t exceed 50%, they remain entitled to recover damages.

Understanding these complexities enables victims and their families to make more informed decisions about pursuing compensation for suffering or wrongful death.

Time is critical in pressing charges towards a favorable outcome given how evidence fades over time. The Illinois statute also stipulates limitation periods ranging from one year (for government entity cases) upwards to two years post-accident (in typical scenarios). Evidence gathering must ideally start as soon after the accident – remember every single detail accounts

It cannot be overstated how looking beyond obvious factors during an investigation process significantly impacts what sort of settlements juries award these cases. Key elements our lawyers focus on consist of:

– Engaging accident reconstruction experts to visualize the incident for juries digitally.

– Invoking sympathy by demonstrating pain inflicted due to sustained injuries

– Illustrating plaintiff’s character and victim’s family thereby humanizing the otherwise cold courtroom processes.

In essence, pedestrian accidents have significant legal consequences warranting intricate knowledge coupled with decisive action plans. Trust Carlson Bier with your personal injury case as we are a group dedicated solely to understanding and navigating the bustling streets of Illinois’s personal injury laws.

As part of our commitment to client satisfaction, we strive to stay entirely transparent throughout these often confusing procedures. You will always have regular updates at every step partnered with an open avenue for Q&A sessions or any discussions about your unique situation.

Retain us – world-class attorneys renowned in this sphere backed by years of winning varied pedestrian accident lawsuits resonates victory in itself! Now that you’ve gained insights into what makes dealing with pedestrian accidents so complex and understand why professional representation is invaluable click on the button below! Find out just how much your case could be potentially worth. Our dedication meets passion here at Carlson Bier; let us repair today by building better tomorrows together. Click ‘Services’ now and allow us to begin representing you promptly, ensuring no critical aspect gets overlooked from lack of time or resources available – two front running aspects in turning cases towards success stories!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Prairie du Rocher Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Prairie du Rocher

Areas of Practice in Prairie du Rocher

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Dedicated to legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Flame Traumas

Supplying specialist legal support for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Healthcare Negligence

Providing experienced legal representation for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Accountability

Managing cases involving faulty products, providing expert legal help to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Aged Neglect

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Fall Occurrences

Specialist in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking redress for their suffering.

Newborn Traumas

Offering legal assistance for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Mishaps: Dedicated to helping victims of car accidents obtain appropriate recompense for damages and damages.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Committed to providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Big Rig Incident

Providing adept legal representation for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for losses.

Building Site Incidents

Concentrated on supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Cerebral Impairments

Dedicated to delivering compassionate legal services for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Harms

Expertise in addressing cases for clients who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Incidents

Committed to legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Demise

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and professional legal support to ensure redress.

Neural Trauma

Committed to assisting clients with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440