Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Prairie du Rocher

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with spinal cord injuries, time and expertise are of the essence. The selection of your legal representation should reflect this urgency. Among an array of options, Carlson Bier lawyers provide exemplary service throughout Illinois, meeting critical needs while navigating the distinct complexities inherent to these cases. Adept at handling delicate spinal cord injury scenarios, they take pride in their commitment to delivering personalized attention and quality results for every client they serve. Armed with extensive experience coupled with firm resolve, our seasoned team communicates effectively and tenaciously advocates for rightful compensation pertaining to medical costs, lost wages or earning potential among other damages associated with such debilitating injuries. Our ethos is anchored in ameliorating distressing situations by combating injustice head-on relying heavily on evidence-backed arguments that hold relevant parties accountable while safeguarding our clients’ rights consistently; thereby establishing us as a paramount consideration within the realm of Spinal Cord Injuries attorneys across Illinois including Prairie du Rocher.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Prairie du Rocher Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the life-altering impact of a spinal cord injury. This severe medical condition can cause debilitating pain and restricted mobility, potentially affecting all aspects of your daily life. The complexity stems from the fact that your spinal cord is the main pathway for transmitting information between your brain and the rest of your body. Any damage to this vital component seriously hampers these communications, leading to widespread consequences differing in each case based on location and severity of injury.

Spinal Cord Injuries (SCIs) typically result from sudden trauma which may fracture or dislocate vertebrae –the bone disks composing your spine. However, non-traumatic causes like cancer, infection, disk degeneration and others also contribute significantly to SCIs statistics in Illinois.

One important point about SCIs is that symptoms do not always manifest immediately post-injury, combined with their variable nature making early detection crucial in mitigating long-term effects. Common initial symptoms include loss of sensation or motor control below the level of injury. These points highlight why immediate attention should be sought following any back injuries.

SCIs are divided into two broad categories:

– Complete Spinal Cord Injury: This results in total loss of function below the level of injury. Victim loses all feeling and voluntary movement.

– Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: Here some functions remain intact beneath the site of damage.

It’s vitally important for us at Carlson Bier law firm to keep our clients informed about these classifications because comprehensive understanding is instrumental when navigating legal procedures surrounding your personal injury case.

Providing cutting-edge legal representation revolves around consistent updates on modern medicine’s evolving understanding of SCIs management as this directly impacts prognosis reports heavily influential in settlements considerations. Physical therapy has proven effective alongside newer treatments like electrical stimulation technologies showing promise in improving quality-of-life after injury while research continues intersecting biology, engineering and computer science striving towards functional return goals.

Being injured due to someone else’s negligence can be a physically and emotionally draining experience, that’s why Carlson Bier provides compassionate yet aggressive representation to spinal cord injury victims. We help you understand your legal rights following such tragedy, guide you through the complex judicial processes and strictly adhere to statutory duty following Illinois law insisting on factually correct advertisements not suggesting physical presence in locations where we do not have offices like Prairie du Rocher.

Though demanding, battling insurance companies refusing fair compensation is our obligation ensuring they acknowledge victim’s sufferings encompass more than medical expenses extending into life-care costs, pain and suffering along with loss of enjoyment in life among others significant losses post-injury.

At this point, the most natural question arises – what might your case be worth? Many variables contribute towards determining this figure appropriate for your unique circumstances and reflecting actual damages incurred. These can include the severity of the injury, related medical costs (both present and future), lost wages from inability to work plus emotional distress experienced as a result of trauma.

In light of these critical factors requiring expert handling aimed at just recompense for sufferers of tragic incidences causing SCIs, reach out to consult with our expert personal injury attorneys at Carlson Bier. We are here to aid victims steering them towards comprehensive recovery via sound guidance during challenging times boosting confidence about decisions concerning their treatment direction influencing potential settlements outcomes.

Don’t let fear or confusion jeopardize your path towards justice! Instead employ informed decisions based on precise understanding elevating chances at rightful compensation easing burdens imposed by unfortunate occurrences wrenching normalcy away from an SCI patient’s life.

Feeling ready now to start discussing details regarding your case? Please click on the button below for a free evaluation estimating possible settlement figures tailored particularly with respect for individual aftermaths brought upon every precious client reaching out seeking our professionally qualified assistance so crucial during these testing times fraught with uncertainty complicating already complicated lives touched by devastating spinal injuries. Choose informed guidance – Choose Carlson Bier.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Prairie du Rocher Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Prairie du Rocher

Areas of Practice in Prairie du Rocher

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Dedicated to legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Flame Injuries

Supplying specialist legal services for people of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Physician Carelessness

Ensuring experienced legal advice for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Liability

Managing cases involving dangerous products, providing specialist legal assistance to customers affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Malpractice

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Tumble Mishaps

Expert in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking recovery for their harm.

Neonatal Injuries

Delivering legal aid for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Crashes: Concentrated on assisting individuals of car accidents get appropriate payout for wounds and impairment.

Motorcycle Accidents

Focused on providing representation for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Truck Mishap

Providing expert legal services for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for injuries.

Building Site Crashes

Committed to assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Brain Impairments

Dedicated to delivering compassionate legal assistance for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Traumas

Proficient in tackling cases for clients who have suffered damages from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Incidents

Dedicated to legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unfair Loss

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and adept legal support to ensure justice.

Neural Injury

Expert in defending persons with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer