FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Prairie Grove

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

In Prairie Grove, Carlson Bier is a trusted resource for individuals who’ve suffered from dog bite injuries. Experienced and dedicated, the attorneys in our group understand the multifaceted implications of such incidents. These cases often involve medical expenses, emotional trauma, time off work and much more. Our specialization in personal injury law underpins our commitment to procure fair compensation for victims of dog bite injuries; ensuring they’re adequately supported during this challenging period. Equally vital is our deep knowledge of Illinois’ strict statutes regarding animal attacks: we strive to utilize these laws to maximize outcomes for clients while captivating judges with well-structured arguments tailored on individual circumstances and nuances of each case. Surge ahead with confidence having Carlson Bier by your side – your advocate in holding irresponsible pet owners accountable while navigating complex legal matters efficiently and competently. Make no mistake – choosing us translates into securing an unparalleled ally representing you based on extensive expertise in dealing with dog bite injuries within Illinois’ unique legal landscape.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Prairie Grove Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the emotional and physical trauma that dog bite victims often bear. Our firm, based in Illinois, specializes in personal injury cases involving injuries inflicted by dogs or other domestic animals. We firmly believe that everyone has the right to live safely without fear of an uncontrolled animal causing harm. Dog bites can result in severe physical injuries ranging from puncture wounds and lacerations to nerve damage and infections. Notably, they may also leave deep psychological scars such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Our team at Carlson Bier is committed to ensuring justice for every client who has been a victim of dog attacks. With our depth of knowledge about personal injury law coupled with extensive practical experience handling these sorts of cases, you are guaranteed exceptional representation tailored to your particular needs.

Understanding various aspects such as laws governing dog ownership and responsibility is pivotal while pursuing compensation claims for dog bites in Illinois:

– Dog Owner’s Liability: As per Illinois statute 510 ILCS 5/16, the state practices strict liability when it comes to dog bites. The owner is held liable if their pet injures someone without provocation while anywhere they have the legal right to be.

– Time Limit for Filing a Lawsuit: In Illinois, dog bite victims must file a lawsuit within two years from the date of injury under Statute 735 ILCS 5/13-202.

– Available Damages: Victims can potentially recover costs for medical expenses, future medical care required due to severe scarring or nerve damage; non-economic damages such as pain and suffering due to disfigurement; lost wages if unable to work during recovery period; punitive damages available only in limited circumstances where the owners knew their pets were prone aggressive behavior.

We leverage this comprehensive understanding of legal stipulations related to canine-inflicted injuries when representing our clients. Our strategy always hinges on meticulously compiled evidence corroborating negligence on part of the dog owner and the extent of damage suffered by our client. Additionally, in extremely complex cases involving issues like multiple dogs or owners, an unknown animal, or instances where the attacking party is a government-owned service dog, we have extensive resources to investigate and seek compensation on your behalf.

At Carlson Bier, you are not just another case; you are a priority. We listen before we act, understand before we advise, empathize as we strategize for the optimal resolution of your claim. With every client interaction characterized by transparency and respect, it’s no surprise that many of our referrals are from satisfied clients who have experienced first-hand our unwavering commitment to championing their cause.

Our philosophy stems from understanding that in this journey towards justice after suffering a dog bite injury – whether it has resulted in physical wounds or emotional trauma – you are not alone. We stand beside you with skilled legal advice while also proving emotional support every step of the journey.

Don’t let your pain and fear steal away your rights! If you’ve been injured due to someone else’s negligence in controlling their pet, click below to find out how much your case might be worth. Our team at Carlson Bier awaits an opportunity to fight for what is rightly yours.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Prairie Grove Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Prairie Grove

Areas of Practice in Prairie Grove

Bicycle Incidents

Specializing in legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Fire Burns

Extending adept legal services for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Clinical Carelessness

Providing experienced legal representation for patients affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Responsibility

Addressing cases involving defective products, providing professional legal services to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Misconduct

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble and Slip Mishaps

Specialist in handling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking redress for their injuries.

Childbirth Damages

Offering legal aid for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Incidents

Mishaps: Committed to assisting sufferers of car accidents receive equitable compensation for injuries and impairment.

Motorcycle Accidents

Specializing in providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

Trucking Collision

Ensuring experienced legal representation for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for hurts.

Building Collisions

Focused on representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Head Damages

Committed to delivering professional legal assistance for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Injuries

Adept at dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Unjust Loss

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and expert legal services to ensure fairness.

Neural Trauma

Committed to defending persons with paralysis, offering dedicated legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440